Jump to content

Oregon school shooting - at least 7-10 dead, 20 injured


DRW50

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

My heart and my prayers go out to the victims of this latest tragedy and to everyone who has been affected in some way by gun violence.  No matter which side of the debate you are on, I think we all can agree that this should not have happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Rumor has it Christians were targeted this time.

 

I'm tired of this savagery. We're supposed to be the greatest country in the world and we can't keep guns out of criminals' hands while honoring the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens? 

 

At at least the shooter ended up six feet under this time, unlike the last couple of times. Small mercy, I know, but we won't have to sit through "his side of the story."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have to ask a question, and maybe I'm dumb and should know the answer, but - has there EVER been a mass shooting where the shooter was female? I'm just curious to know and, sadly, there have been so many I can't think of them all off the top of my head. Just curious - not that it matters one way or another. No matter how you slice and dice these type of things, they're never any less horrendous

this broke my heart. how sad, but true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No. When women kill it tends to be personal and less about making a statement. Women who kill multiple people tend to do it more like serial killers: one at a time and with the intention of getting away with it or they do it at the command of some psycho they love, think Charles Manson.

 

IMO, mass shooters are usually inadequate failures as men who feel like they've lost some power they were entitled to. Women aren't raised with that expectation so when they kill they are killing a person while the Dylann Roofs of the world are trying to kill society. That said, the day is coming when we'll have a female mass shooter and I suspect it's coming soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He is absolutely RIGHT. I don't agree with him on much, but on this I do. There are like a couple dozen of you, and ONE of him, if everyone didn't just stand there, at least you would have a chance. Good grief. I don't know what the deal is, have millennials been so coddled all their lives that have lost the instinct of survival? If you won't fight for your own life, I don't know what to say to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sorr but that is victim blaming. Not one person knows how they would react in this type of situation including Dr. Ben Carson. It's why I cringe when I hear people talking about how the answer is to give everyone a gun? Really? Don't we see how many problems there are with personnel such as police officers and military personnel, people who are allegedly trained for these situations, much less someone who has never touched a gun. And no I don't believe that even those out there who have been trained including you, know how you would react if someone with several automatic weapons suddenly started shooting people up. And just how many other innocent people would get hurt.

Not one person including the president has talked about taking guns away from legal and law abiding guns owners. I would think even gun owners are smart enough to see how the NRA isn't representing them but the gun manufacturers yet it's the same sound bites about how rights are being taken away etc. As someone who is deathly afraid of guns, when do my rights get taken into consideration or the rights of the victims, because I am tired of mass shootings being all about the how persecuted gun owners and not the victims or the real problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It is not victim blaming. Nobody is blaming any victim for the shooting. And many people DO know how they'd react. If you don't know yourself well enough then maybe you wouldn't. It comes down to a large percentage of poeple are just sheep and will be lead to the slaughter without fighting back. If your'e gonna die, might as well go down fighting, and secondly, it IS harder to hit a moving target, in case you didn't know.  A alot of gun violence is committed by repeat offenders, if you'd simply make a law that if you use a gun in the commission of a crime, you get life in prison with no possibility of parole, that would stop it really quick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's not victim blaming now ur calling people sheep? Not u or anyone else knows for a fact how they would react I don't give a crap what you or Dr Ben Carson says. Unless you've been trained and prepared for specifically these type of situations you have no clue. As I pointed out, even people trained to deal with this have had issues and don't act flawlessly.  

I'm not sure how running up to a gunman with an automatic weapon is going to stop anything. It might just make the shooter angrier and cause him or her to go on another rampage and kill even more people. Until you are personally in that situation or know the psychology of the shooter it's a completely baseless claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ben Carson basically blamed these murder victims for not being tough and bootstrappy enough. As soon as he used the words "I wouldn't stand there and let someone shoot me" he was blaming. 

 

I hope that someday he gets to experience this situation so we can see how perfectly he handles it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

    • And while I'm doing catch-up, it's good to see you did as well. And YES. This is how May Sweeps SHOULD be. A story climaxing. Another A story being built up as we did with the aftermath of the first A story climaxing. B plots being built up...actually moving and being interested in most of them...if not all. hehe. New story being started. And even the C plots are moving, too. 
    • It definitely did. Nothing major, but I clocked the minor changes too. Passions did something similar with its theme in the later years and people thought I was crazy, but the nuances are there if you're paying attention. 
    • What? A nice little mini-marathon of catching up before work.    YES, PLEASE. 
    • I guess they copied literally everything from that C&R scene, the dialogue etc 
    • And even then...you have to wait a couple of weeks to be sure he's actually dead.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Apparently. lol.  Well you know I don't mind standing also with the cheese so  
    • I have nothing to add. Everything you said is on point, and I don't know whether to laugh hysterically at it or throw things at the television. I do know it's terrible soap opera.  
    • Characterization: - I realized I have PTSD from Ted #1’s constant swaying. The moment I saw NuTed, I actually caught myself thinking, “Why isn’t he rocking?” - Leslie makes very little sense from a storytelling perspective unless she’s completely psychotic. What was she hoping to achieve with all her dramatic reveals and aliases? Also… who wouldn’t put two and two together after Laura’s accident? - Anita and Dani come across as mean-spirited, and honestly, the Duprees should just be portrayed as full-on villains. Been saying this since day one—remember when Dani punched Haley and the whole Dupree clan just walked away from her with that “shame on you” look? Wrong on so many levels. Glad others are finally seeing it too. - Mona is sanctimonious and I can’t stand her. She’s the worst kind of person: lower-to-middle class but constantly making excuses for the rich. - Call me crazy, but I’m actually enjoying Ashley and Derek’s storyline. I’ll take this neurotic OCD queen over the sanctimonious, multi-talented nurse any day. Plus, soap couples are usually so plastic. They deal with insane drama but never go to the bathroom, never plan a weekend away. Look at Kat and Tomas—every scene is just them planning lunch or dinner…! - Btw by now André seems bored af by Ashley.   WTF Moments: - No young woman would be even remotely interested in going to a casino (looking at Eva). And it’s wild how the show is treating gambling like it’s some kind of therapeutic hobby—like retail therapy or something. - What are they doing with Smitty’s eyebrows… and more importantly, why?   Parallels with Other Soaps: - I like Nicole, but she reinforces my belief that soaps should never include psychiatrists. If they’re portrayed accurately, they ruin the fun by rationalizing everyone’s childish and selfish behavior. If they’re portrayed inaccurately (hi Taylor from B&B), it’s equally bad. - Anita’s story is giving major SSM vibes from 2017‘s Y&R, when Victor got Nikki to start playing the piano again.  - Karla played a model on B&B too…

      Please register in order to view this content

        Direction & Continuity: - Pascarelli is hands down the worst director this show has. - Wednesday’s episode started with a nighttime establishing shot of Orphey Gene’s… but all the scenes that followed were clearly set in daytime—until halfway through the episode, when it suddenly switched back to night. - The picture on the piano at the Duprees’ house shows two little girls and two little boys. Who are the boys? One could be Martin (or Tyrell?), but who’s the other kid? (And speaking of pictures… no one under 50 is walking around with a printed photo in their pocket. But I digress.) - I love catching the time on the phones when they pop up onscreen. Friday’s episode was supposedly set before lunch, but Vernon’s phone said 3:15 in one scene and 3:50 in the next. A few scenes later, Kat is playing Leslie’s audio for Jacob and her phone shows 10:40. Cool. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy