Jump to content

Bill Cosby


Marco Dane

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

"Depraved" is almost too mild of a word to put on it. I'm just sorry this scandal has effectively tarnished all the strides he has made over the years in regards to education and humanitarianism. But, as Fleetwood Mac once said, heroes are hard to find.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It will take a decade or more to begin to recover what is left of his good works. And that's very sad, because when I was a kid he was everyone's dad, black, white, you name it.

I'm not sad for him, because Bill Cosby is a serial rapist. I'm sad for that legacy of work - what little of it can be separated from the rapist. And I don't know how much that is. Maybe we'll never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

At this point, I figure you just move on. If his legacy is strong, it'll stand on its own, and there will be no need to say that "Bill Cosby started this" or "Bill Cosby created this." That might be hard, thought, because Cosby was the original Tyler Perry when it comes to plastering his name on every-[!@#$%^&*]-thing he created.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For the most part, Vee, I agree with you. I, too, don't feel sad for Cos, because, well, how CAN you feel sad for someone who drugged and raped multiple women? Does the man have psychological demons? Most def. And if he hasn't sought professional help before now, then he should. But that is as far as my empathy will extend.

Where we might disagree, though, is whether his legacy as a comedian -- the TV shows, the films and comedy albums, etc. -- will ever be reclaimed from this mess. The more I think about it, the more I think it will -- but not during his lifetime. In fact, it might not even occur during OUR lifetime. I think our present generation will have to die out first. Then, in another generation or two down the road, people might re-discover his work in one form or another, and they will be able to appreciate it as you and I and so many others did once upon a time. The scandals won't be forgotten, but enough time will have passed that it will be a side- or foot-note, perhaps, and not the beginning and end of the story.

At least, I hope so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Bill's become another Rev. James Cleveland in my book. I'm perfectly capable of separating the man from the music so to speak, and while I'm content with that, at times I do judge myself for not having a strong aversion to everything associated with these men. I'd be lying if I said that I'll never seek out The Cosby Show and Fat Albert dvds, just as I'll go on listening to Peace Be Still and Jesus Is The Best Thing That Ever Happened To Me. Perhaps it's a character flaw of mine, but I find it easy to compartmentalize people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Again, I hope so. When I say these tragedies have tarnished Cos's legacy, I mean to say they have tarnished it for our generation (meaning, the children of the '70's, '80's, and early '90's, the ones who, as Vee so eloquently said above, looked to him as everyone's dad). Never again will we look at him OR his body of work without at the very least a side-eye. But, who knows, maybe future generations will feel differently. As I said before, though, it'll take time and distance from the rapes before that occurs. And even then, you know, there is still no guarantee "The Cosby Show" -- the so-called "crown jewel" of his legacy, the single biggest advancement in the cause of better depictions of African-Americans and traditional family values on network primetime TV, and a ratings and syndication juggernaut in its day -- won't end up buried next to "Beulah" and "Amos 'n' Andy" in the Black TV Series Graveyard (something, by the way, I never would have thought possible).

But I'll say this much: because his involvement was more limited than it had been with his other shows, I have a feeling "A Different World" might be the one enterprise of his that will come through this relatively unscathed -- which is really ironic when you think about where it stood in the Cosby empire BEFORE these events unfolded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's particularly painful to consider watching reruns of Cosby or A Different World, knowing at least some of those women were victimized by him - possibly even some of the stars we've mentioned.

I feel particularly bad for ADW, which is still modern and ahead of its time in many ways.

I think its criminal notoriety now, if not its past legend, will see to it that never happens. The question is, what of the good in it will hold up?

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And there is nothing wrong with that, IMO. Just hold onto those DVD's so you can pass them down to your kids, should you ever have any. ;)

But seriously. I wish I COULD emulate you in this instance. The single greatest disappointment of my life -- next to finding out about Cosby, of course -- was learning what a POS Cybill Shepherd was and is IRL. For me, this knowledge ruined my love for "Moonlighting," a series that practically gave me life as a comedy writer, to the extent that I wouldn't go anywhere NEAR the DVD's OR the episodes that others posted all over the 'net. It's just too bitter-tasting for me (and knowing Bruce Willis was no day at the beach himself makes it only worse).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

See, and the thing about that is because the one Cosby work that I truly stan hard for (The Bill Cosby Show) came way before his image as America's Dad, I find it easy to compartmentalize as well. Every time I go to the bookstore, I'm tempted to pick up the DVD set because it was such a great low-key comedy for its time, sorta this mix of Julia and Room 222, and I love that, but now it's just...ugh. It pisses me off that a person could do so much good while being so bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Random thought, apropo of nothing:

To think: Ed. Weinberger and Stan Daniels, who guided such shows as "Mary Tyler Moore" and "Taxi," also had to work for Bill Cosby and Johnny Carson, the two biggest jerks in an industry that also employed Jackie Gleason, Arthur Godfrey and, until a few weeks ago, Donald Trump. Granted, they were never raped and never had to join Joanna on the Rich Bitch Alimony Tour. Nevertheless, the dues they had to pay, making those two yahoos look good to the public.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Good point.

If and/or when future generations will be able to look past the retroactively added innuendos of "Dr. Cliff Huxtable" as a sex fiend, I think they will be able to appreciate, as we all do, the fact that a Black family could be on TV and NOT be living in the projects or trading in putdowns of their Caucasian counterparts or of each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, I agree -- totally. I'm just saying, I never could look at "Moonlighting" once people like Glenn Gordon Caron and Alan Ball dished their dirt on the broad. Knowing the stars' personal lives upsets the Irna Phillips in me, I guess, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York   Steel Magnolias: The leading ladies: Dolly Parton: "She is one of the sunniest and most natural of actresses," Roger Ebert wrote. Imagining that she probably saw Truvy as an against-type role, Hinson concluded it's still well within her wheelhouse. "She's just wearing fewer rhinestones." Sally Field: "Field, as always, is a lead ball in the middle of the movie," according to Denby . M'Lynn giving her kidney to Shelby brought out David's bitchy side. "I can think of a lot more Sally Field organs that could be sacrificed." Shirley MacLaine: "(She) attacks her part with the ferociousness of a pit bull," Hinson wrote. "The performance is so manic that you think she must be taking off-camera slugs of Jolt." (I agree. If there was anyone playing to the cheap seats in this movie, it's Shirley.) Olympia Dukakis: "Excruciating, sitting on her southern accent as if each obvious sarcasm was dazzlingly witty," Denby wrote. Daryl Hannah: "Miss Hannah's performance is difficult to judge," according to Canby, which seems to suggest he took a genuine "if you can't say something nice ..." approach. Julia Roberts: "(She acts) with the kind of mega-intensity the camera cannot always absorb," Canby wrote. That comment is so fascinating in light of the nearly 40 years Julia has spent as a Movie Star. She is big. It's the audience who had to play catch up. And on that drag-ish note ... The movie itself: "You feel as if you have been airlifted onto some horrible planet of female impersonators," Hinson wrote. Canby: "Is one supposed to laugh at these women, or with them? It's difficult to tell." Every review I read acknowledged the less than naturalistic dialogue in ways both complimentary (Ebert loved the way the women talked) and cutting (Harling wrote too much exposition, repeating himself like a teenager telling a story, Denby wrote). Harling wrote with sincerity and passion, Canby acknowledged, but it's still a work of "bitchiness and greeting card truisms." The ending was less likely to inspire feeling good as it was feeling relieved, according to Denby. "(It's) as if a group of overbearing, self-absorbed, but impeccable mediocre people at last exit from the house."
    • I tend to have two minds about Tawny (Kathy Najimy) fainting during Soapdish's big reveal. You're the costume designer, if anything, you should have known the whole time. I guess it's an application of what TV Tropes calls the "Rule of Funny." Every time I watch Delirious, I always want the genuine romance in John and Mariel's reunion at the deli counter to last longer. Film critics had their knives out for Sally in this period. I'll start a separate thread on the movies page.
    • I don't think so, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was Dumas this whole time.
    • Tamara Tunie was serving up grand dame diva fierceness.
    • Nick told Victoria that he and Sharon had married in England.  Victoria was shocked.  Then she realized he was kidding.  He confirmed it was a joke and they're platonic. I don't even know what to say about that.
    • It's funny you say that because part of the entertainment of the trials on the show are all the day players who come on as witnesses and jurors.  I'm certain it was like the Law and Order of its time. It employed so many New York actors, that if you look close enough, there's usually someone vaguely recognizable in the courtroom.
    • I will defend Dante.  People already suspect he may be a bit unstable from time to time (from his time as a prisoner).  And, he's taking care of other people's kids from time to time.  So, he has reason to be cautious with those in his care.
    • Josh continues to try and milk Abbott/Newman rivalry. First it was Billy/Victoria, then Kyle/Summer, then Noah/Allie (that worked out well) and now Kyle/Claire. Do we have any inkling when Billy Flynn will arrive and who he will play? I'm sure Cole's illness will mostly play offscreen. What's in store for Nick and Sharon? Is it time to put them back together? I can't see any other romantic options. Nick has no children on the canvas to play off, as Christian is never seen. Sharon has only Mariah onscreen.
    • I would appreciate (if they're not coming), for future scripts to refer to them by their iconic hairdos.  For example, if Hope needs to call Chelsea because Bo has Sepsis, I'd like Shawn-D to say, "My Mom called Chelsea (the one with the sassy short black hair) for an update." Also, new rule, if Melanie does return, she needs to dye her hair back to red.  I googled who she was five times during Victor's funeral.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Broderick, thank you for all of the info [I edited for space]. I am so grateful for everyone filling in the blanks for me. I suspected the Nora/Eliot scene was very important and it was setting something up but I didn't know what. Can't wait to see it play out. The two actors had such a great back and forth. I should have made the Paige/Patty Hearst connection. I thought Paige was in love with Brian from the first episode I watched but it seemed as if they were brother and sister. Steve kept being affectionate with her so I assumed he was the love interest. Then she was affectionate with someone else and well..she's a very busy woman. I can't wait to see Frances Fisher show up. (I'm trying to be vague because I don't know what would be a spoiler in this storyline) Now it makes sense why Draper would be upset. I didn't get the whole background of why he didn't go to NY. I'm a sucker for good acting, so I might still side with April and Margo, if the writers don't give Draper more to do besides yelling.  He had more chemistry with Logan, but I know that's not happening.  Something else I noticed: the show really takes care with even the smallest parts. The acting is superb. Too often, I noticed on older soaps they don't take care with the recurring or day players (Ryan's Hope was so bad with this that I couldn't make it through some episodes). It's only been six episodes, but so far, the casting department was spot on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy