Jump to content

Worst of soaps: 1950s to 1980s?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Santa Barbara's problem was focusing too much on Cruz/Eden in the late 80s plus having a revolving door of supporting characters. Once Eden and then Cruz left, the show was doomed.

Ryan's Hope kept a lot of the same characters, but recast most of their characters quite a few times. Plus, some characters were in a hamster wheel (i.e. Delia/Roger, Jill/Frank, and Pat/Faith) while other supporting characters were in and out.

Guiding Light killing Maureen Bauer off didn't kill the show, it just started the process. I think the show in 1997 was fairly good with establishing Rick/Abby as the next generation Ed/Maureen with Michelle potentially inheriting the angst complex of Ed while the show was pretty well balanced. 1998 with the Reva clone, Beth coming back as a border-line psycho, Annie Dutton coming back with a new face as a 'copy, Holly becoming a nursery rhyme stalker killed whatever potential it had to regain its former glory after Maureen's death, and the start of Santos invasion (Mick Santos was around blackmailing Blake, getting beat up by Ken norris, then getting killed at the beach by Drew/Michelle as 1998 ended).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Which is pretty much what I was alluding too. The benefits were immediate but down the road, the show become unmoored. Actually killing off a number of dynamic, albeit peripheral female characters helped push the downfall (Nadine Cooper, Jenna Bradshaw, for example). A lot of elements pushed the downfall, but I definitely agree that the tip of the iceberg began with killing Maureen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agreed. I appreciate Quartermaine's opinion,and I know this is a point of contention for OLTL fans, but... Frommy perspective, the high camp fantasy of the Rauch era really burned itself out by the end and stopped working (I personally think when Peggy O'Shea left as HW was when things went downhill, but...) Of course Rauch briefly tried a return to social storylines (the rap story! LOL) and everything I've seen from his last year or so was awful.

While I get that some fans disliked the Gottlieb era, I really think it's unfair to say any soap could have done an AIDS quit story. Because frankly, as Llanview in the Afternoon shows, that was seen as a very risky move at the time and it and other stories were seen as things that other shows simply weren't touching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That isn't true. Kimberly (and Michael) and the story with Rae and Seneca was hugely popular. This is why ABC forced Claire Labine to bring Kim back, even though she felt the story was over. I know many disliked her when she aired on SOAPnet, but I thought the storyline was very well written and she improved enough to make it work. Had they let her exit when Claire wanted, it would've been fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The problem with Ed and Maureen as a tentpole couple is Ed was not that type of character, especially Peter Simon's Ed. He was very neurotic, as was she, and he and Maureen just didn't have a strong enough marriage. That was his second affair (third if you count Claire), and Maureen had been in love with another man at some point during their marriage. Maureen on her own could have served as a central figure for GL, but she and Ed together didn't have that function. I think that's one of the reasons JFP very stupidly decided to kill her. They just weren't right together.

It's like calling Bert and Bill a tentpole couple - they weren't.

P&G made a huge mistake in culling the Bauers, especially characters like Hope and Hilary, who had ties to many other groups on the canvas and, in Hope's case, could have driven story with the Spauldings for many years.

They also made a huge mistake never bringing Mike back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It may have been popular, but the story itself was toxic and also boxed Rae into a very tight corner, as Louise Shaffer later said.

When I watch 1981 RH episodes, the entire show feels nasty and very limited, and while that is not all down to Joe and Kimberly (it also has to do with the very misguided decision to put KMG's Faith in a central role and the overly repetitive, tedious "Delia pays" storylines that made me grow to despise Roger as the most sanctimonious hypocrite in town), they were a big part of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've always wondered why they didn't bring Hope back in the later years because they desperately needed her and they could've easily made her to tentpole character with Spaulding connections (as you stated). Same with Alan Michael too. Though he wouldn't've been tentpole, I think that he should've remained central to the canvas instead of that epic fail last run the character had.

As I did in my blog (when I was tending to it :P), I would've loved for Hope to come back Springfield and soften Alan again like she did in clips I've seen of the two. IMO, Hope humanized Alan and made him so much more than the mustache twirling villain/pariah that the show made him with Ron Raines was in the role. IDK why GL didn't snag Robin Mattison, who played Hope in the early years, when she left AMC in the late 90s and brought her to GL. I would've loved to have seen Hope be the "guiding light" to the cast's characters.

GL pissed me off in it's final years because they had the history to go all out and bring back beloved characters (Rita, Holly, Hope, Quint, Nola) that still had life in them and could've added so much in the final years. Instead we got swamped with newbies like Christina, Ashlee, Natalia, Rafe (even though I did like him for the most part), Grady, and Cyrus that added NOTHING to the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

By the end I don't think they could have afforded most of those old characters, although I do wish they'd tried bringing back Hope and another A-M recast. Elvera Roussell was a day player on B&B a year or two after GL wrapped, so clearly she wasn't picky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I saw some of the episodes of RH circa January 1981 through march 1981.. and it seemed like it was two islanded shows in one. You had the Ryans drama with Faith/Jill/Frank played out along with Rose/Jack and Joe/Sibohan with Delia being made to look stupid on one 'show'.. and then you had Kim/Rae with the man they were both dating on the other end... with Seneca being the clueless husband. If I was a new viewer, I would have had no idea that Rae and Seneca had previous ties with Frank and Jill.. nor that Kim had even met the Ryan's clan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Bingo. People forget that GL was on a very, very tight budget. Unlike Y&R, who can afford vets because of it's much bigger ratings, etc., GL was just hanging on. Heck, for a long time in the 1990s, GL was a day behind in several major markets because it aired at 10 am, which didn't help. It wasn't until CBS got a second satellite feed that allowed the entire country to see the episodes same-day and by then even more affiliates had taken it out of the 3 PM. It was lucky to have lasted as long as it did, when it was way past prime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Posted in another thread on this board: LOVE OF LIFE   Head writers :                   Esther & Richard Shapiro (September 1970 - February 1972) Loring Mandel (Feburary 1972 - April 1973)  Claire Labine & Paul Avila Mayer (April 1973 – April 1975) Margaret DePriest (April 1975 – December 1975) Paul & Margaret Schneider (December 1975 – September 1976) Gabrielle Upton (September 1976 – November 1978)
    • Please register in order to view this content

      Marnie Schulenburg's widower. She was such a strong person. (I did not realize he played the Tucker Carlson knockoff on Succession)
    • She has the Bo Buchanan curse.  Agreed, Carly's reaction would be quite interesting. 
    • I agree. Even the discussion about cuts at the end of scenes. I'm binging THE DEFENDERS right now, and it has those cuts. Is it odd? Oh God yes. Heck, I will say it's worse than what has been discussed here because it does not bother me here and this was back in 2017/2018.   That said...I am starting to look forward to BTG finding their proper rhythm.     
    • Louise, what memories & Brooks with her! Other favorite domestics: Lucinda's butler Matthew, Ginger on GL, Vivian of course on AW. A notable butler & a notable cook at the Qs. DAYS Ivan taking care of Vivian Allamain all of those years. Oh, on AW Carl had a driver who sometimes had other duties: Ito? I recall him being Asian. I always felt sorry for Louise & Brooks when Mac & Rachel would fall out. How difficult it must have been for them with all that tension & heaven forbid they be in the room for one of their fights, which were violent & mean-spirited & loud! 
    • I don't believe JFP wanted rid of Donna because she was isolated. She wasn't any more isolated than most characters on the show at that point. JFP just couldn't live out her fantasies with Anna Stuart the way she could with Linda Dano. She degraded the character instead, as happened to Donna under a number of regimes.  Donna, Rachel and Felicia were never characters who were all over the canvas. Felicia probably had the most reach of the three, as she ran restaurants for a decade, but they had their own spheres.  Rachel had a large role in Felicia's alcoholism storyline, as Felicia tanked her relationship with Cory Publishing and then her drinking caused her to start a fire at the TV studio, meaning Rachel had to fire her from her talk show. Rachel was at Felicia's failed intervention. Felicia and Donna had some back and forth during that strange period where Donna was dating Cass. 
    • This show has many, many old school influences in how it approaches recapping, elder characters or supporting players, certain character monologues, etc. Some of that is stuff that feels straight out of the Bell formula or B&B, and some of it feels even older to me. That's not entirely a compliment or a positive nor is it a whole negative. It's a very wonky mix at times of dialogue that tries very, very hard to be hip and current - with varying degrees of success or cringe - with old-fashioned soap storytelling exposition and character monologuing. It's actually fascinating to watch, good or bad.
    • Emphasis on the work...VANISH.

      Please register in order to view this content

          I've discussed this at length in the monthly threads on the main A stories as established by Week 1...which Martin's secret was one of them. Most soaps would have an A story one week with all the B/C plots just orbitting about. BTG did that well itself in the first two/three weeks. But like I mentioned before one of the A stories (Dani/Bill/Hayley) they can't keep going to that at the moment since it was already overkill by the end of Month 1. The other one...the Silk Press storyline...was really the only one that has been well-paced in my opinion with twists, turns, and builds...including subplots and near-misses. But that was not going to explode before May Sweeps. So that left Martin's secret...which as I said...started off well. I loved how it started with Martin having problems sleeping, but NO images. Then we got sounds. THEN we started to get images. And NOW those images are getting more established. But before we got all that, his storyline...which has been established to be a main one...vanished for a month and a half. While it worked for the storyline since Month 2 gave Martin (and Brandon Clayborn to grow) time to be more established...along with his family...the story of his secret could have also been a story that had a nice slow burn (which I love) to the show while having the other B/C plots orbitting it. Again, not mad at it since it allowed the audience to learn more about Martin and his family life. It also allowed for other B/C plots to grow on the audience. I also think the story development for that A story might have suffered from the writers still trying to find a rhythm that works for this show.   In any case, I also said that I felt they might go old school soap in May. And by old school I meant as an A story is climaxing, the writers take another story that will be the next one and start to build it up again, while also starting another plot as a C plot. And right now, we have the SilkPress storyline climaxing while Martin's nightmares (with images) have finally started to come back into play. I mentioned when I saw the promos of Martin vs Ted that hopefully the reveal would trigger Martin to the point that we FINALLY get to see what he did. So far...how Martin's been acting since the reveal, being so triggered, I still feel that is how we will see how things happened...allowing the next A story to finally take off.    Fingers crossed.   
    • You know what? After all the men she's been with dying, it's only appropriate that she try her hand with women. Only then will she discover how much of a curse she is when it comes to relationships. Of course, I don't think the show would go there, but if they do, I wonder how Carly would react to her daughter being with Robin's.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy