Jump to content

Prospect Park Sues ABC Over ‘One Life To Live’ & ‘All My Children’ Licensing Agreement


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 725
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted
There wouldn't have needed to be a transfer of ownership in 2008 as AMC was ABC owned and the character was ABC owned and in their vault. Its not like there needed to be any type of legal transfers or licensing for AMC to be allowed to use the character back then. Clearly that's changed with whats happened since the cancellations and change of networks
  • Members
Posted

Thats what I meant just that since The City was no more the character became core to AMC which inturn makes her viable for PP

  • Members
Posted

I HIGHLY doubt that specific issue is in their contract. I would be shocked if anyone on either side ever even thought about that fact.

I still wonder where Sky falls into all this.

Originated on AMC, moved to OLTL, ended on GH. She was a GH character last when the shows were sold.

  • Members
Posted

Im sure their was a list of characters that PP liscened that shows in the original agreement & Cassandra is on there

  • Members
Posted

I really don't think it matters. No one's gonna fight for Cassandra. As others have said, this fight is really about the actors.

Now I guess ABC could be petty and complain about her usage but really, it wouldn't be worth their time.

  • Members
Posted
and that is the issue behind this thread; ABC's unauthorized use of PP licensed characters. GH hasn't used Skye since this lawsuit was brought upDitto. Cassandra was most likely wasn't considered when the original deals were made in 2011 as they were originally going to retain most of the original cast. Cassandra seemed like the perfect addition to this 5 year later scenario that the recently hired writers thought up
  • Members
Posted

All that matters is if Cassandra is on the list of AMC roles liscened to PP. If that happened, PP is in the clear to use that role.

  • Members
Posted
lol..I don't remember. He was making fun of Tess or Aubrey.that's what I would expect. Not that ABC would give a damn about wanting to use her, but it would be a perfect point in a countersuit, if they bring up that PP is doing exactly what they are being accused of. That could shut this whole down and make the claims all "baseless" LOL

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • What was the point in Lori's return as Mrs. Max Hollister? That little story never made much sense to me.  Were there plans for a permanent return? Or even a new family with her as the matriarch?  
    • I guess it depends on your device.  I can watch CW shows via their website on my Windows PC.
    • Ooooo A Liam episode? I'll watch it later today. They sure are churning the daily episodes out early.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Welcome back, Shawn Douglas! It's been a while. It really is too bad that the writers don't really have an interest in the character because there are still a lot of ways that he can be used effectively on the canvas. He should have been a part of the 60th anniversary celebrations as well. If anything, just to represent Bo and Hope. And I'd much rather see Jada paired with him than possibly with Theo. But I enjoyed him getting caught up with Belle, and comforting her. I'm sure they'll find their way back to each other at some point but I do like them as divorced friends. I just hope we see it play out onscreen. Belle being a dick about Sami again was unnecessary though. And we finally saw Liam again!  I'm curious to see how this storyline is going to play out, and who's going to be weaved into it. He and Abe do work well together too. And we learned that he has a kid. Hopefully, we'll learn more about his character in the future. But I'm not really sure about Johnny and Chanel suddenly having problems with raising Trey. They've wanted a baby for so long, so I don't understand why this is even an issue. They should know by now what it's like to raise a baby. But I did enjoy Johnny's scenes with EJ, and that Johnny still hasn't refused to forgive him. This storyline was/is very clunky, but having the two of them be at odds is the right decision. There's so much story potential that can be drawn from that. As for Chad... there was no time for us to see his reunion with Will, but there's time for us to see him talking BS with Leo? I don't get it. And I don't get all this random dating app stuff either. Leo and Javi were boring af too. If we're forced to endure them, can they at least have some real conflict? The two of them losing the baby was the perfect opportunity for it. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I enjoy BF better on Days than on YR.   Chad is greater than Cane, in my opinion.
    • Ick! Seeing MS and BF making out as the characters onscreen was just ewwww.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy