Jump to content

AMC: The Prospect Park Era (old production thread)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 9.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

After FX Canada's debacle I bought them all from iTunes so I'm glad I'll have them in some format (I have the first three weeks from FXCanada saved to my DVR...) but I know the feeling.

Well I agree there (though the current AMC's cliffhanger was not all that major--just lots of unresolved stories.) As great as the rumoured original ABC ending apparently was (with a Six Feet Under finale rip-opff showing all the characters in their old age, etc, or whatever) it doesn't really sound fitting for the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have been saying this/asking for this for the last two years. I don't care who does it, whether it's ABC or PP or someone else. I don't want a "best of Erica Kane" or "clips from the 80s" DVD. I want full episodes, as good a quality as they have, available for purchase online. I doubt it will ever happen, but I'd happily pay to watch them, especially if they were paired with brief recaps or at least a least of who was in which episode so I'd know if I want to buy that particular episode or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

How does Jean get in the conversation? I swear it's so funny jean probably laughs her haters as she got the big bucks head writing the number 1 soap. Anyways I believe the fans Amc deserved a finale for all the years they put in. Abc doesn't regret one second cancelling Amc. The chew is 2.5 to 2.7 million a much cheaper budget.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Erica didn't want happiness with Jack, though. That's why Agnes and Broderick wrote what they wrote, IMO. The essential element of Erica's character - however sad - is that she doesn't want Pine Valley, or security, or poor Jack, no matter how much she may love him. He's just never going to be enough. They could've written anything, but they wrote that for a reason.

It broke my heart but I totally understood it when I watched it - it went back to the oldest, oldest truth about Erica, and turned out to be a grace note, a very deep piece of a character that the ABC soaps - soaps in general - haven't been capable of touching upon in many, many years. Claire Labine used to understand those facets very well. And from what I can tell Y&R used to run and run on those deeply, deeply-rooted character neuroses, but in a very different way, more arch and dark. And the Erica/Jack beats were one of my favorite parts of what I felt was a fairly so-so finale for AMC on the network.

That's part of what we lose, IMO, if these shows just go back to the network lock, stock and barrel and they don't invest in new talent. I truly hope someone picks up the properties and does something with them, but even when I heard about this option last fall, pre-PP, I didn't want them recycling the same hacks. I wanted something new. Now I've seen something new - and for the first time in many years I could watch AMC, OLTL and GH together in a day and have them all look and feel different. That kind of nuance and differentiation is something both Disney and the Frons era systemically erased. But to me it felt like the future. As I told Eric - yes, I am quoting myself:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Over the years - and even during the kidnapping with Jane - it felt to me like Erica really wanted Jack to rush in and save her and be her white knight and actually play pseudo-paternal role in her life. He was there for her when Mona died, when she had a drug addiction, when she went to jail for Maddie, when Bianca had anorexia, when she dealt with alcoholism and Bianca's rape, etc. Her disfuring car accident was a rare crisis in which he didn't hover over her, offering a ton of support. Anyway, Jack was willing to play that paternal role too, to an extent, and I got the impression that he liked sweeping in and taking care of her when she was hurt or lost or scared or what have you.

The problem is that once she recovered from whatever it was, she didn't seem to want him to be that paternal savior role any longer. She wanted him to be something else entirely, and he wanted her to be something else too. I disliked a lot of MMT's writing in the mid-2000s, but I felt like she nailed certain aspects of Jack and Erica, including their desire for completely different things in life - she had Jack telling Brooke how much he loved having Sean there and all of the activity and chaos that comes with a house full of teenagers... while Erica is living in a hotel and is telling her ex-husband over (non-alcoholic) drinks that she's gotten used to living on her own and focusing on herself and her needs and that she feels like she's in danger of losing who she is. Even early on before Jack wanted a really domestic existence, he still tried to control what she did - telling her to rehire Ceara Connor or they were through, for example - but as time went on, I felt like they grew further apart in terms of what they wanted out of life.

I actually thought the Jack and Erica aspects of the finale were really good and VERY true to both characters - Erica had grown up enough to know that she didn't need to rush off to the altar for the wrong reasons, Jack had this image in his head of how it had to be, and if he couldn't have that, he was done with her and was going to storm off again, and Erica was trying to follow her dreams and find a way to compromise so she could still be with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This may be an upopular opinion but I think many investors may find SL to be kind of a joke. I mean her daytime emmy losses became a joke outside of the Daytime drama community, We fans know she's not a joke, but I doubt investors wont invest cause Susan wont do it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If Susan is a "joke," she's a joke that's been laughing all the way to the bank for over 40 years while most of the people mocking her have watched their credits dwindle.

I don't think the issues at PP had anything to do with Susan, or for that matter, with investors having any issues with the AMC or OLTL brand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Susan not being there on the canvas was noticeable but I loved seeing other characters on the forefront like Angie and Jesse and the sex trafficking storyline with Cassandra, granted tger other storylines that needed some polishing but other than that it felt like the AMC my mother always talked about and loved

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
    • Only thing I enjoyed was Abby / Olivia, etc., and the addiction storyline. Otherwise, I could do without the season.
    • Right? Vanessa had a ball gown for every occasion.
    • Roger's return storyline may have been silly but Roger's return was what lead to GL's last golden era.  It was the combination of Roger's return and Robert Calhoun becoming EP that got GL to finally hit it's stride after some really bad years. It will always disappoint me that the ratings during Robert Calhoun's run didn't reflect the quality of the show.
    • He also gave some of the best episodes, like the episodes surrounding Doug's death. The problem with Days was that Ron had a horrible vision from he top. I don't feel the same for MVJ and nothing that has happened in all these months suggests she doesn't have a handle on the show. Now if it becomes an issue I'll acknowledge it, but I'm not seeing it so far.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy