Jump to content

HOLIDAY MIRACLE: Prospect Park Back On Track To Revive AMC and OLTL


Recommended Posts

  • Members

We don't really know about writers--they could have been approached and due to issues (like the WGA stuff) have been told to keep quiet. The last go around, a team was assembled for AMC and told not to announced anything (and maybe writers--Carliati aside--just aren't as twitter happy as actors).

Also, at this point, while your point is wise, I think it's equally wise to try to see who from the old cast you CAN get back and then build from there. Otherwise, why reboot?

Would some of these writers who were turned off by all the network demands be willing to try again at a venue where they'd probably get less interference (and less money)?

Largely yes. But even Gottlieb (who clearly has an ego) has said she was learning and made mistakes. To be fair the death of Megan did directly lead into their first major story (where many think they first came around even if it did involve an outside character)--the inolvement of Andrew, Marty who had Lupus like Megan led directly into Marty's jealousy of Andrew and saying he molested Billy which led to Billy's coming out and the whole AIDS story and to Vicki and Sloan, etc.

And Megan's death was about four months into Malone's run--not that it makes a big diff. He was hired in Aug 91, his material began airing in Sep, and she died in Jan...

Malone and Giottlieb were learning. When Griffith who had soap structuring instincts joined Malone pretty soon after things really did gel--Gottlieb decided to hire him for that reason. I think that was a smart decision, and one you'd rarely see nowadays. They also hired Bedsow Horgan because of her huge history being on writing and production teams for PNG soaps to be on the writer's side for the same reason. To me that's actually quite a quick turnaround towards success for what was an extremely troubled soap, by a very novice soap team and hardly something to discredit them (while it does prove not everything Gottlieb did was great of course). While not as stylish, i think the show stayed strong, with the DID story, etc, under Bedsow Horgan as EP (Gottlieb appointed her as her successor), but when Josh Griffith left by his own choosing less than a year later, Horgan says she basically replaced him as co-headwriter while being EP and admits in the interview that it was a huge conflict of interest and the show quickly suffered (think Malone's never ending Italian mob thing, etc).

I agree. They need something to really pop in the first arcs for each show. Maybe if Agnes is involved enough she's helping do the initial setups.

Agreed on all accounts. He seems to know new media, which is why I assume he was chosen. But yeah, his name is now out there, he should be careful with what first comes out when you google.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

That;'s a good point. Before PP had this wacky idea--NOBODY was interested. Andy Cohen and Oprah said they were sad to see them go, but clearly didn't have any interest in having them on their networks. Nobody else really thought there was even a possibility to make an online version work. The idea simply wasn't out there (yes fans had suggested it--a little bit--with P&G soaps, but nobody seemed to consider it seriously). Yes PP screwed it up, and frankly treated people badly, although it seems more out of naivity--they thought they could take on more than they could--than malice. But to have the thought process of "thanks PP! These are gonna flop and if it hadn't been for you we'd have these great Summer soaps on ABC Family" is ludicrous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The vitriol comes from what we learned after the fact last time. The fact that they had virtually no regular PR team and instead played shiesty L.A. games in the industry trades to try and put pressure on the WGA and Susan Lucci to buckle without any real negotiation. They made one offer, walked away without discussion and leaked to the press that the other parties were all too "difficult." It was a hustle and a shakedown and it was shitty behavior, and it appears to be continuing now. It's all surface and a big gloss job followed by attempts at intimidation and gossip-mongering towards people and programs who deserve better. They were unserious people who clearly thought the little old soaps required a minimum of unserious effort and a lot of bullshit and brass. Let's not forget that in the end they apparently didn't make their payments and did not have the money they claimed to, either.

If I thought they truly were making a good faith effort this time to rectify their prior errors and weren't just in this to leech more money from the rights, I'd be more optimistic. I tried that last time and got burned. These people scream hustlers to me now and too little seems to have changed. I really hope they prove me wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They needed a PR team then and they need that now. Even once these shows are in production, they need to build relationships so fans and people in the position to promote their shows will care to do so. Even their weak statement a couple days ago could've been much better. They need someone regularly on Twitter for one. They don't understand how successful a grassroots campaign is for entertainment in the age of social media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Cameron is getting work. Production has just started on a Thanksgiving movie that he is starring in with Jennie Garth. Good for him. He might not be a talented actor, but he hustles for all sorts of work.

http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2013/01/08/production-to-start-on-abc-family-movie-home-again-starring-jennie-garth-and-cameron-mathison/164616/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Tvbythenumbers+%28TVbytheNumbers%29

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy