Jump to content

School shooting in Connecticut


Eric83

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

A lot of things contribute to these situations. We should look at ALL of them. Better healthcare for the mentally ill, domestic violence (it sounds like this may have been a family situation writ large), the media glorification of murderers, etc.... All of these things should be examined. But only when the conversation turns to guns are we not allowed to even discuss making changes to public policy. No matter how many times this happens over and over and over again we aren't allowed to make the mere whisper that we should do something common-sense like reauthorizing the assault weapons ban or closing the gun show loophole. No matter how many bloodbaths we get every month we aren't even allowed to put the subject on the table. That's not the case with anything else.

It's time to put guns on the [!@#$%^&*] table.

  • Replies 166
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

Perhaps, but if nothing else, longer and stricter waiting periods allow more opportunities for outside intervention in matters such as these. You can't tell me he wasn't giving warning signs before today, or that everyone around him was unaware that something about him was "off" in the days and weeks leading up to this tragedy.

  • Members
Posted

I wish the opposite. I hope he's finally at peace, and I truly hope that this is a signal to parents and everyone that mental illness is nothing to be embarrassed about. Fight harder for the law to help when you might have run out of options.

  • Members
Posted

There are gun control laws in China & Australia and they WORK, it can in America, we just have politicians who are too cowed by the NRA and whatnot to pass actual gun control laws.

Sad when in this country it's easier to buy a gun than it is to register to vote or buy real estate

  • Members
Posted

I'd like to agree, but I think people get the guns no matter what. I wish someone would concentrate on making it more difficult to buy guns illegally.

  • Members
Posted

Meanwhile, I cannot believe one of my FB friends suggested allowing schoolchildren to carry guns (in order to defend themselves) as an actual solution. Please, you can't trust 'em with glue, let alone handguns.

  • Members
Posted

I don't know the extent of what his mental health was - has anything leaked as yet?

While I agree you have to be mentally disturbed to pull something like this, I would like to know if there were any sings or history with him. Even then, I still find it hard to muster any sympathy for him - at the end of the day multiple children who will never get the chance to fully live their lives were shot dead and he's responsible. Are they not the victims?

  • Members
Posted

They want 5 year olds to carry guns?

Unless they think every child is Dean Winchester or the kid on the Walking Dead, I don't know what to say.

  • Members
Posted

But which "he"??

There appears to be much confusion over the shooters identity. Who can even say what the history is at this time when they haven't apparently sorted out the identity of the shooter? The one being broadcast as the perpetrator is in custody, the younger one is dead and is now being said to be the actual shooter. Details appear to remain sketchy.

On a slightly tangential note, I agree with those who think we need a 2 pronged approach. The mental healthcare standard in this country is obviously inadequate, and the stigma, I think, contributes to this failure. And yes, I have believed that we do need much firmer gun controls. Why does anyone need such ready access to a high powered weapon?

  • Members
Posted

As Gigi Morasco (ONE LIFE TO LIVE) once said when told to hold her cell phone up to lightning: "That sounds so safe."

  • Members
Posted

There's big money to be made on paranoia. That's what some gun groups run on. There is a paranoia that people need the deadliest ammo, that even things like cop-killer bullets are necessary.

The paranoia is why I no longer believe gun control will make a difference. I think this will just go underground.

I can't keep up with the details either (I thought the father was killed, then read that it was a brother), I was just going on the early info.

  • Members
Posted

Yes, he's responsible. However, it would be wrong of us to demonize the shooter, write him off as a monster unworthy of anyone's sympathy or compassion, and then leave it at that. Obviously, some dark, emotional, and ultimately uncontrollable forces pushed him to do what most never would dream of under "normal" circumstances. In his own, sad way, then, I see him as much of a victim in all this as the schoolchildren who became the unfortunate targets of his struggle.

If soap operas teach us anything, it's that we need to understand the victimizer as well as the victim. Otherwise, we shut ourselves off completely to the human condition.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • I guess it depends on your device.  I can watch CW shows via their website on my Windows PC.
    • Ooooo A Liam episode? I'll watch it later today. They sure are churning the daily episodes out early.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Welcome back, Shawn Douglas! It's been a while. It really is too bad that the writers don't really have an interest in the character because there are still a lot of ways that he can be used effectively on the canvas. He should have been a part of the 60th anniversary celebrations as well. If anything, just to represent Bo and Hope. And I'd much rather see Jada paired with him than possibly with Theo. But I enjoyed him getting caught up with Belle, and comforting her. I'm sure they'll find their way back to each other at some point but I do like them as divorced friends. I just hope we see it play out onscreen. Belle being a dick about Sami again was unnecessary though. And we finally saw Liam again!  I'm curious to see how this storyline is going to play out, and who's going to be weaved into it. He and Abe do work well together too. And we learned that he has a kid. Hopefully, we'll learn more about his character in the future. But I'm not really sure about Johnny and Chanel suddenly having problems with raising Trey. They've wanted a baby for so long, so I don't understand why this is even an issue. They should know by now what it's like to raise a baby. But I did enjoy Johnny's scenes with EJ, and that Johnny still hasn't refused to forgive him. This storyline was/is very clunky, but having the two of them be at odds is the right decision. There's so much story potential that can be drawn from that. As for Chad... there was no time for us to see his reunion with Will, but there's time for us to see him talking BS with Leo? I don't get it. And I don't get all this random dating app stuff either. Leo and Javi were boring af too. If we're forced to endure them, can they at least have some real conflict? The two of them losing the baby was the perfect opportunity for it. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I enjoy BF better on Days than on YR.   Chad is greater than Cane, in my opinion.
    • Ick! Seeing MS and BF making out as the characters onscreen was just ewwww.
    • The SON board.

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy