Jump to content

Barbara Esensten passed away


Recommended Posts

  • Members

1997 is what sucked me in to Guiding Light full-time and forever a fan. Before then, I had only sampled it. It became so intriguing, exciting, and well-balanced. 1998 is when it became a 2-storyline soap (Clone and PHarley, then Clone and Ben/Blake/Ross), but even then I tuned in religiously until 2000. I'm guessing lots of interference from the higher-ups is what led to so many wacky over-the-top stories they did (Reva clone, Teri-is-Annie, Annie's truth serum, Nursery Rhyme Stalker, etc.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
You must be wink.pngI'm late to this, but RIP. And that We Love Soaps link to a documentary the BBC did on Guiding Light in 1999 is GREAT, with her interviews. I've never seen it before.It's nice to hear some good things about their time at GL, as I didn't really watch. I did love their work at Loving, and while The City started off pretty rough, I still think the last 6 months in particular had a lot of great stuff and somehow managed to find a balance of traditional soap elements with some sense of new stuff. I even liked their AMC to an extent--the main fault when they wrote it was that it was often *dull* and repetitive, but I find it hard to judge AMC writing at that stage when Frons had so much control.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In the end, I feel like Barbara Esensten and James Harmon Brown loved writing for soaps and loved writing for ALL MY CHILDREN and GUIDING LIGHT, but that love was hampered often by network execs and sponsors who had their own concepts of what made compelling drama. They weren't visionaries like Nixon and Marland, but they tried, and it's just a shame that they had to be HW's in an era when TPTB in general do not support writers anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Absolutely agreed. Of course nobody has brought up their PC work, but again it seemed to be the networks that encouraged them to go in the supernatural direction, after some initial success experimenting with that, which is when it imploded on itself. With AMC, Frons seemed to just be waiting to bring in Pratt and his vastly different style of storytelling. They also seemed to do above average scripting work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've been told -- although I can't verify, so if anyone knows otherwise, please correct me -- but I've been told that B&E's scripts in particular won Nancy Curlee and her team at GUIDING LIGHT the Best Writing Team Emmy that year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Community Posts

    • This is typical Phyllis though, so is it really a mental health issue with her? This is just basically another day in Phyllis world
    • I'm near 1999 and let me say... Everything past Belief has been crap compared to the first 7 years.  I tried to make myself like it and even had moments when I wanted to believe it was back... but now watched...1994 to 1998... The Titanic has sank and the band is Still playing. I am still hopeful for 1999 to 2002...  Because hope dies last. But watching these first 7 seasons in dept made me just not like anything since. And I once watched all these seasons as a teenager and loved them. My main issues. 1. Disgustingly bad dialogue and repeated scenes that make you want to vomit. There are moments when there are 5 episodes in which the same scene is repeated. We also have flashbacks all the time. 2. Taylor has been destroyed as a character. The smart interesting woman of 1990 to 1993 is gone and there is this pathetic crying all the time victim. 3. The show looks and feels cheaper. The clothes look worse and sometimes I forget I an watching a show about fashion people. The first 7 years were so glamorous and beautiful. 4. Making Brooke the slut from the valley made the whole war between her and Stephanie a cartoon. The beginning... the first 7 years it was very high level quality conflict. Stephanie was not so cartoonish.   Overall I am thinking of re watching the first 1700 episodes and just never going pass that. But I will continue with 1999.    
    • I think once outside of the bubble that Bill Bell and Kay Alden had Eileen in, it was more difficult to hide what a harsh presence she is (this was also an issue when she returned to Y&R, I think). She was all wrong as a Capwell kid, who, aside from Terry Lester's Mason I suppose, were generally smoother on the surface and cracked underneath.
    • The only thing they got wrong on this was GH was NOT the first show back in production with covid protocols, BOLD was    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy