Jump to content

AMC and OLTL Canceled! Part 2!


Recommended Posts

  • Members

AFTRA wouldnt have let it happen, even though many actors like Robin Strasser has said over the years and I heard from local actors too that AFTRA is considered flimsy, I doubt they would give up Jursidiction of the soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 912
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Exactly Jane, a new soap or soaps shot in Canada on the cheap with a bunch of new inexpensive faces could have worked. Look at Degrassi as I mentioned, no "stars", no "names" there (the talent admittedly dubious, but no worse than some adults in U.S. daytime). One thing the three Degrassi series have always had going for them is good characters and writing (even when corny and heavy-handed, it was endearingly so).

John, you may remember how Susan Flannery and B&B made news when there were reports that they approached SAG about taking jurisdiction over their show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, I said the same thing upthread, and marceline was saying that could even be a consolation prize for the AMC/OLTL actors who did sign on and are now left out in the cold. Of course, we've still got the union issue. Argh!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Going to Canada is ridiculous, but shooting a soap in a business-friendly state is a good idea. CA & NY are probably the two most expensive states in which to do business, and NJ & CT aren't cheap, either. The South has grown in population over the past 20 years in part because so many businesses have re-located there. (And two big reasons why businesses choose to re-locate there are because taxes are lower and unions are less powerful.) Wilmington, NC has huge studio facilities, and I'm sure there are also plenty of options available in FL, GA, and TX.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think WW's blog entry makes it clear: soaps aren't dying because people are tired of the art form, they're dying because networks and advertisers have not caught up with technology. This is true not just of daytime, but of television across the board. If these people want to keep network television alive, they need to figure out a new way of gauging who's watching which show (and how, and when). Simple as that.

Thanks, John. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Both. Ha ha.

Seriously, if Canadian production companies wants to produce soap operas, thats cool, but I think it's a silly idea for American productions companies to produce American soaps in another country. Shouldn't those jobs stay here, especially if they're producing shows 52 weeks a year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I tend to agree. I think there are other ways to keep U.S.-produced soap operas in the U.S. without resorting to leaving the country just to save a few bucks. (But yeah, I'd love to see a Canadian-produced soap opera, too!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy