Jump to content

AMC: Who Would You Cast As Kendall & Greenlee???


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 201
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Ewwww. Id rather they just kill Marissa off then bring Grandma Boring back. The only thing remotely interesting about her was how Annie kept clowning her and the show made a big joke out of her in comparison. With no Annie around, whats the point? She's just bland and boring with no one to feed off of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the problem with gay characters on soaps is that they are so ridiculously limited. They usually only have three options available to them when they come out.

1. They are either shackled solely to one gay character for their entire run on the show (Luke on ATWT, Bianca with Maggie to an extent in the earlier years of her character) this would harm any character because their is only one option for romance on the show which would stagnate any character. They can't really grow or change because they are interacting with the same character over and over again. There is no other love interest usually either because writers don't want to have to create another gay character solely for another character and risk it not working out so that's why they usually import heterosexual characters into being "bi" or finally seeing the light and being "gay" even though they had no problem having several heterosexual relationships before hand. No explanation will be given usually to this either. See Noah and Maggie.

2. They are asexualized so problem one doesn't show up. The show completely subjugates their sexuality and they become asexual characters who have no desire to sleep with anyone or anything and only exist in a supporting capacity in friendships and family scenes. No personal development needed. (Bianca was this for a long time, as was Lucas Jones)

3. The worst case they get written off the show (Lucas Jones on GH, Kish from OLTL). I sadly understand Pratt's arguments that having a gay character on the show kind of limits story possibilities in terms of love interests because you can only have them in a relationship with a gay character and any deviation from that sends out the sharks from the LGBT/GLAAD organizations because after all you can't be bi and like both men and women. It's all or nothing mentality that a character has to be 100% straight or 100% gay. Which is why you get the complete conversion to the house of only penis or vagina. And you must abstain from communion with the opposite genitalia at all times unless you risk your gay card being revoked. We already saw trespassers in Maggie and Reese.

What do you mean by fully realized, actual couples? Because I think soaps for better or worse have done that. Luke/Noah and Bianca/Reese are probably the two most realistic gay relationship in soaps I think. I don't think the problem is lack of realism in gay relationships so much as it's unrealistic that these characters are stuck in the vacuum with the other person because they are both gay. It's like the only reason they are together sometimes is because their gay and from that stand point they are married and lose all momentum in building the relationship up into an actual relationship instead of an arranged marriage given by sexual orientation.

GLAAD and LGBT community would die. Bianca would be "turning her back on the gay community". Fans would riot because Bianca is such a huge character for the gay community and having her orientation changed from gay to bi would piss them off more then the Breese relationship itself did.

Would never happen. Bianca is the flagship lesbian for the soap community and for the gay television community. The fact that this storyline pretty much already existed with both Maggie and Reese kind of shows how unpopular it was with Bianca's own fanbase. Bianca was side step for men both times and the ire was felt threw out the AMC world as well as the LGBT one. Having Bianca not be 100% lesbian would send a huge uproar even if Bianca herself is a character in name only these days.

Say whatever you want but Colin Egglesfeild is pretty. wub.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

True. Sad, but true.

Frankly, I think the majority of viewers understand this issue better than TPTB give them credit for. Unfortunately, it's folks like GLAAD - who, IMHO, do not represent the views of the entire LGBT community - that get heard more.

On the other hand, a smart writer, such as Agnes Nixon, would know how to "head them off at the pass" and incorporate their viewpoints into the touchy subject of Bianca, a "confirmed lesbian," suddenly developing romantic feelings for another man. Hell, even Megan McTavish was able to get pretty much everyone's viewpoints incorporated into Julia's abortion story, and abortion, IMO, is a way touchier subject than bisexuality. But, either way, it's a [!@#$%^&*] shame that writers have to live in fear of people like the GLAAD Gestapo.

He is pretty. And I wouldn't have minded him being on AMC if they had cast him in another role. Seriously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • What? A nice little mini-marathon of catching up before work.    YES, PLEASE. 
    • I guess they copied literally everything from that C&R scene, the dialogue etc 
    • And even then...you have to wait a couple of weeks to be sure he's actually dead.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Apparently. lol.  Well you know I don't mind standing also with the cheese so  
    • I have nothing to add. Everything you said is on point, and I don't know whether to laugh hysterically at it or throw things at the television. I do know it's terrible soap opera.  
    • Characterization: - I realized I have PTSD from Ted #1’s constant swaying. The moment I saw NuTed, I actually caught myself thinking, “Why isn’t he rocking?” - Leslie makes very little sense from a storytelling perspective unless she’s completely psychotic. What was she hoping to achieve with all her dramatic reveals and aliases? Also… who wouldn’t put two and two together after Laura’s accident? - Anita and Dani come across as mean-spirited, and honestly, the Duprees should just be portrayed as full-on villains. Been saying this since day one—remember when Dani punched Haley and the whole Dupree clan just walked away from her with that “shame on you” look? Wrong on so many levels. Glad others are finally seeing it too. - Mona is sanctimonious and I can’t stand her. She’s the worst kind of person: lower-to-middle class but constantly making excuses for the rich. - Call me crazy, but I’m actually enjoying Ashley and Derek’s storyline. I’ll take this neurotic OCD queen over the sanctimonious, multi-talented nurse any day. Plus, soap couples are usually so plastic. They deal with insane drama but never go to the bathroom, never plan a weekend away. Look at Kat and Tomas—every scene is just them planning lunch or dinner…! - Btw by now André seems bored af by Ashley.   WTF Moments: - No young woman would be even remotely interested in going to a casino (looking at Eva). And it’s wild how the show is treating gambling like it’s some kind of therapeutic hobby—like retail therapy or something. - What are they doing with Smitty’s eyebrows… and more importantly, why?   Parallels with Other Soaps: - I like Nicole, but she reinforces my belief that soaps should never include psychiatrists. If they’re portrayed accurately, they ruin the fun by rationalizing everyone’s childish and selfish behavior. If they’re portrayed inaccurately (hi Taylor from B&B), it’s equally bad. - Anita’s story is giving major SSM vibes from 2017‘s Y&R, when Victor got Nikki to start playing the piano again.  - Karla played a model on B&B too…

      Please register in order to view this content

        Direction & Continuity: - Pascarelli is hands down the worst director this show has. - Wednesday’s episode started with a nighttime establishing shot of Orphey Gene’s… but all the scenes that followed were clearly set in daytime—until halfway through the episode, when it suddenly switched back to night. - The picture on the piano at the Duprees’ house shows two little girls and two little boys. Who are the boys? One could be Martin (or Tyrell?), but who’s the other kid? (And speaking of pictures… no one under 50 is walking around with a printed photo in their pocket. But I digress.) - I love catching the time on the phones when they pop up onscreen. Friday’s episode was supposedly set before lunch, but Vernon’s phone said 3:15 in one scene and 3:50 in the next. A few scenes later, Kat is playing Leslie’s audio for Jacob and her phone shows 10:40. Cool. 
    • I forget that throughout the 80’s the TV seasons were officially over in April. Not sure why that was the case but it wasn’t until the mid-90’s that May Sweeps became a real official thing.  Because my teenage self stayed home often on Saturday nights in the early 90’s I watched Empty Nest just about every night to the bitter end, I do actually always felt a bit sad whenever I see that GG ep knowing that Rita’s character will die with that last line “Good night!” For years I admit I had the Mandela effect that Mulligan was in the episode before I finally caught it again on Lifetime.    And yes lol I don’t care for David Leisure’s character in the episode but somehow was funnier than anything on Empty Nest. Same when Charley crossed over for Dorothy’s Jeopardy dream. 
    • Jon Lindstrom proved with Ryan Chamberlain on GH that he can play menacing and evil. He's not doing it here, and I think it's a combination of writing and performance.   To be fair, Longoria has modeled and has represented major companies like L'Oreal, but she was never a runway model. I don't have any problem with seeing Dani as a runway model. I think it's more than possible, and I don't understand anyone criticizing her look. I actually have a bigger problem with the whole "Anita is an EGOT" thing. I think it goes way too far. Give her a Grammy. Say she was nominated for a Tony, or even won. But an EGOT winner? No.   The fact that you're using DAYS to defend a BTG set is telling, since we all know DAYS is poverty level soapdom. I expect so much more and better from Gates.     I can't help it, but I'm LOL at the people defending that backroom bingo hall casino and making excuses for it. It's hilariously bad.  
    • If NBC could have for seen the ratings of Lovers & Friends (the replacement for Somerset).. they would have for sure kept Somerset on the air longer. https://jason47.com/days/ratings1976.html  (ratings for Somerset in the final year) https://jason47.com/days/ratings1977.html (ratings for Lovers & Friends short run...getting as low as a 2 rating).  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy