Jump to content

August 1-5, 2011


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Good for OLTL. OLTL, AMC, and B&B all up in their key demo while Y&R and GH are stagnant and Days down. Not that week to week means much or that any of this does anymore. Needless to say I think OLTL is carrying that lineup these days. It proves that a good compelling story involving compelling characters(Todd on OLTL, Sami/Nicole - the baby switch on Days) pulls people in not big names(Vanessa or Genie) or events which don't keep people engaged for the long haul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

omg OMG omg OLTL is kicking ass and taking names to the bank. WAS ABC CRAZY TO CANCEL THIS SHOW? The show is hotter then ever and it continues a 16 week beating GH. Thats four months guys and the show is so strong. OLTL is too good for the web. IMO OLTL should be a primetime show, I would tune into watch it. Props to Frank and Ron they are just going out on TOP and with a huge bang. ITS UNBELIEVABLE HOW OLTL is leaving other soaps in the dust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For this one week only, all this hype about OLTL being "on fire" in the ratings actually has some merit to it. This doesn't mean that ABC was "crazy" to cancel OLTL, however (especially given the fact that TPIR and The View regularly crush it in the ratings, and that LMAD sometimes beats it as well).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think OLTL did was smart was slow build Roger's return to climax two months later. Ron/Frank knew we have waited years for this return and they aren't dissapointing. Brenda's 2002 return was great very impactful and VM did her best acting in that return. This last return was just horrible from the beginning absolutely a total botchjob. OLTL DOESN'T DESERVE its cancellation. U know other soaps have been cancelled and fan outcry has never done a thing to reverse it. Honestly IMO its these great continued ratings that should make ABC look and say MAYBE we made a mistake. OLTL has been under budget for 3-4 years and is doing better then far expensive soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Its more because this was a story waiting to be told. I'd venture to guess if RH just came in and replaced TSJ you would not have gotten any uptic. And while I adore VM, what story was waiting to be told with her return? Reuniting with Sonny? Who cared about that? I say the same for Genie Francis if she came back. GH already played their big return stories, in 2002 when Brenda came back from the dead and that did raise ratings and when Laura came out of her vegitative state for the 25th anniv wedding. Even Laura's permanent recovery did nothing for ratings when they sent Laura off to France. They already played the bring old vets back with Robert, Anna, Felicia in years past.

For GH all they can do is bring a Q back from the dead like AJ. What other cards to they have? But then AJ was not a hugely popular character and I don't think Alan at this stage coming back from the dead would do squat. They had the chance with Emily a couple of years back and went another riduculous route. Even bringing original Carly back to play another character did squat.

2 Todds has been a story RC talked about and its finally playing out. And the pace had been decent and it involves all their lead actors for the most part. Even John McBain is half interesting again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OLTL only has ONE good storyline and that's Todd vs Todd. The only reason ratings are peaking is because obviously people are interested in the return of RH and to see how the story plays out. Take that away and OLTL is still the same soulless show it's always been. People using these ratings as justification for ABC not to cancel these shows is laughable.

If PP is really smart they would use TSJ as an antagonist to RH to keep the momentum since that's all this show has going for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

B&B is really up. Y&R is doing pretty good. Every day B&B was over 3 million that says a lot though OLTL beat it on Monday. Good day on Monday for OLTL buy those numbers sure did fall off. I even notice AMC is going through a surge of its own. ANd Poor Days. 2.1 million on friday. Last in the demo. They got a lot of work to do. Cant wait to see what JNewt has to say

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The thing is OLTL was rising before Roger's return. The Bully storyline was pulling in good solid numbers for OLTL and Gigi's death. So u can't make that case it was all Roger. OLTL set in motion back in April 2011 after cancellation. Everyone balked at the big increases as I did but show has consistently beaten in viewers GH which has a far more expensive cast. U all keep saying this and it fails with the numbers consistently going up and up. After awhile u need to start to notice. OLTL should not have been cancelled PERIOD. GL was a dying dog, AW was going down tubes, ATWT had life in it but had waned but OLTL is going out with a HUGE VENGENCE/BANG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Were those reasons to do with having younger children on set? Other shows seem to manage. The ageing up of the kids has been one of the mistakes the show has made.
    • I agree.  Lemay was supposed to start in early 88 and we saw some of the writing on the wall with character reference from the past.  Notably, the core families Frames, Cory, Matthews.  The stupid Reginald Love was wrapped up.  Not even a year later Mary was written out of the show along with Vince and the McKinnons who came and left .  The previous writers tried to introduce a new family that never aspired with the viewers.  1988 was focused on the 25th anniversary of show in 1989 and suspect why Lemay was asked to come back in 88.  Prior to 1988, the storylines were so DOOL stupid.
    • That's true. He may have ended up keeping her on a recurring basis, like Dr. Michaels on ATWT. I'm trying to remember if GL had a similar long-running therapist.
    • Oh in terms of ratings I think it would have been in a dicey place probably even before then. I mostly was just thinking of if the show could have carried on creatively. 
    • Even if by some miracle Knots Landing continued, 1994/95 it would have been killed by ER.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Assuming that Marland had been allowed to write the Carrie story the way he'd envisioned, Millette would've been involved in the story. And she might've played a role in Andy Norris' return (if the speculation on that had ever materialized, and Marland loved bringing back bad boys) But he doesn't seem interested in Sara's personal life. And the women of Springfield could only be analyzed so much.
    • This better be something, because as I said, so far it's just cliches and stereotypes -- the story we've heard a thousand times about the homeless person who doesn't want a home and prefers to live on the streets.
    • @rsclassicfanforever thank you very much for the recent uploads of season 13 containing some episodes that were skipped or glitchy on YouTube!  I had a look at 3172 though and there is no audio for most of it? Would you have a copy with complete audio? Fingers crossed! Thanks again! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I like Margaret well enough in what I've seen of her as Paige - she is green but she has real star power.  I agree about the actor who plays Brian. He's...mostly just there. Not bad but not great.  My main issue is with the guy who plays Owen. He's just not appealing to me. I can believe Nola being obsessed with him, but he's draining to watch.  I'm surprised people objected to the quasi-incest elements as it wasn't anything that new for soaps.  Speaking of Kim, here's a rare episode of an anthology show she did called The Evil Touch.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy