Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Aww. Very nice of Susan!

It's sad for AMC because even though production is moving online, it's still "the end" for a majority of the cast and crew as it's going to be months before they start up production again. For a launch in mid-late-January, wouldn't production have to start up in at the very latest, November? I'd say they need to get up and running ASAP.

With OLTL, they will go right from ABC to online so while they WILL lose a lot, it won't be as if the show were truly ending.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

How do people know the cast is clueless. We know the actors received some sort of proposal from PP just a couple of weeks ago. HOw do we know they want to sign everyone? Maybe they are focusing on who they see is key like Susan first. And who's to say what the content of such proposal is. Maybe many of the actors didn;t like it and they are busy lining up new talent for the online show. Personally I am less concerned about the who they are going to sign versus the what the show is going to be and just maybe the cast is concerned about that too before running to sign on the dotted line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is so true, Erik. If PP was really interested in doing what was best for AMC & OLTL, they would each be cut to 30 minutes (so they could get back to basics). Instead, it looks like (based upon the speculation in this thread and elsewhere) PP is going to go the 13-week "arc" route and/or is going to increase the number of stupid outdoor park scenes.

Erik, I'm so glad that you, Carl, and others have had the courage to criticize PP for not even considering cutting back each soap to a half-hour. If I were to ever originate such a sentiment, a few folks here (though certainly not a majority by any means) would immediately launch into nasty personal attacks stating that I am a "disgrunted P&G soap fan bitter that his soaps didn't get saved" (rather than respond to my comments based on their merits).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But do we know what PP is going to do? Have THEY made a stmt saying these shows are going to be 1 hour and exactly the same. And I think a lot of us who are kind of enthused about this welcome changes. If all they are going to do is take whats on ABC and move it online I will pass. And I think these shows have more issues other than writing. Pacing, casting, production values should all be concerns and are things that impact viewing acceptance and enjoyment. And I think the 13 week arc is a fantastic idea espeically on the web. Viewers don't have to feel like they have to "invest for life" and like it or not thats been a major turnoff to attracting younger viewers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Definitely. It's not bad at all, but yesterday was just an anomaly considering we haven't had an episode that bad before. 
    • I caught most of the episodes during that time period.   Subsequently Bell or Alden (I forget which) revealed that Peggy's rape story was done for strategic ratings purposes.  Chris's rape had occurred earlier, before the show really caught on & was near the middle or the lower end of the ratings.  Bell had been pleased with the concept and wanted the rape story to play-out for a much larger audience.  By the 1975-1976 season, the show was near the top of the ratings and was extremely popular among high school & college kids.  He felt the time was right to re-tell the story.   When I was watching in 1976, I didn't find it especially "cruel" that lightning had struck twice in the Brooks family.  I felt it was more of a continuation of Chris's storyline, giving her a chance to continue dealing with the trauma of her own rape.  
    • Dan being de facto HW explains a lot. It's clear the show changed direction on a dime according to his interests or whims.
    • Really enjoyed today's episode the whole way through. Having Drew and Nina as red carpet hosts was a brilliant move. You could really see Cameron Mathison channeling his own experiences as a TV host for shows like Entertainment Tonight, but putting a more sinister spin on the host's glib patter. And Cynthia Watros gave some amazing reaction shots during Drew's interactions with people like Carly, Joss, and Willow.  I also really liked the Alexis/Kristina scenes. I know a lot of us find Kristina exasperating, and she is, but Kate Mansi and Nancy Lee Grahn do a great job of portraying a very real dysfunctional mother/daughter dynamic. 
    • The episode she got killed off in - which made Wendy a prime suspect in her murder (her car was spotted outside the house) and then Wendy mysteriously disappeared from town. 
    • Norm!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • What Dan Curtis never seemed to understand -- and what Art Wallace knew from the get-go -- is that a slow, suspenseful build-up creates a far more satisfying episode than the constant "cliffhangers" that never amounted to much.  ("I'm going to kiillll you, Julia!" before every commercial break, lol.)  
    • George Wendt has died at 76   https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/george-wendt-dead-cheers-norm-1236222950/
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy