Jump to content

B&B: Old/Classic Discussion & Articles


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Omg, did you guys see what is writen in the vault?

Please, angel, come forward and let's resolve  this issue. You've been everyhthing for us. Don't leave us, because of this. Please... We WILL give you CREDIT and THANK YOU MILLION TIMES. Let's resolve this.

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

How dare you? It just came to our attention that you're nothing but a cheap, sad impostor. Go get some therapy for your self-esteem issues. Because of you, our real benefactor who's been treating us with these videos will no longer upload anything.

 

Have you ever thought how they would feel about this? Have you ever considered that what you did is simply disgusting?

 

You should be ashamed of yourself!

 

Note to the real uploader: if you see this note, please don't let this sorry excuse for a human being to ruin this for us. Whoever you are, we are extremely grateful for what you have been doing for us. I am very sorry this had to happen. I am checking that vault at least 5 times a day to see whether there are new videos and many others do the same. Your work really has had a great impact and it would be very sad to see this coming to an end. Thank you, thank you and thank you!!

Edited by RNN8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh no!

Please register in order to view this content

  I'm sorry that I assumed the person posting was the uploader. I'm incredibly grateful to the real uploader, whoever he or she is. THANK YOU.  Even if they stop uploading like Amy, they have already given a lot and deserve to be thanked, although, of course, I hope they will find motivation to continue.

 

It says in that note that the real uploader was trying to make an account and it hadn't been approved yet... I wonder is there someone that we can contact here, an admin or whatever? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'll bet anything the imposter was that goof who was trying to profit from B&B episodes. Once realized no-one was falling for the scam, he/she decided to get back at us another way. Hasn't been heard from since majority let him know that no-one would be putting $$ into his pocket for his episodes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It does take a few weeks for the account here to get approved, I know mine did.

 

Very sad the real Angel has been upset by the person taking the credit. Many of us contribute, none more so than the real Angel, so I’d like to think the ‘imposter’ was just taking the credit for the 5-ish episodes they posted up recently? They mightn’t have understood what ‘Angel’ meant? 
 

I’m not trying to take sides at all, just trying to understand what happened and why if someone was baiting us, they would also put 5 or so episodes up in the vault? It kind of doesn’t make sense to me.
 

Regardless, I am very grateful to the true Angel and very much hope they stay and take part in the group, more than anything.


Added: Actually take a look at anon4520’s history of comments here by clicking on their username...they have been contributing for a few months now to the vault...I think it was an innocent act to say they were the Angel. Can’t there be many Angels, in our own unique way? I think the situation has been misread, unfortunately...

Edited by BoldKara
Addition to thoughts
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Vault admin here. It's no fun when someone takes credit for something you've done, but I think what happened, while unfortunate, was a knee-jerk reaction to what might have easily been an issue of semantics, so it's very possible the message may have been misconstrued. I don't think it's fair to immediately be pointing fingers and jumping all over people before they've been given a chance to explain themselves. I've checked the message board history of the user and they in the past seem to have contributed to the vault, so I'm willing to give them the benefit of a doubt. I'm hopeful for the two ends of the parties to resolve the issue on their own.

 

Please give people the chance to explain themselves before you take out your pitchforks. The last thing we need is real-life drama surrounding the drama of our favourite shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think everyone needs to take a breather lol. 

 

Was checking out this vault lately cuz i'd like to put the march-june 93 eps I have in there rather than on youtube like I was if I ever get them on my computer. 

 

I think & hope soap opera uploaders get a little more thick skinned by one person doing something they perceive as hurtful or something, cuz theres clearly several uploaders and a lot of room for misunderstandings if theres bad /a lack of communication. And someone on the classic forum awhile back hid their youtube videos when 1 person upset them too. I think everyone appreciates the uploaders and It is beyond me to understand why 1 person or 1 thing sets off an extreme lol

 

I will say though it would be nice if SON would let that uploader have an account here, but unfortunately SON is on Days shooting schedule where you have to make an account 6 months in advance of actually getting said account approved.

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Felicia becomes more layered/balanced in the early 90s (circa 1991/1992/1993).   She leans more into the more down to earth element that you like, while still being Felicia of the 80s.  The process starts in 1989.. but doesn't really become apparent until the early 90s.   Iris was the rare connector character with her having a role at the hospital (I think she's on the board), working at Cory Publishing, and having romantic flirtations/connections with a lot of the male characters between 1988 and 1994.  Which resulted in her having interactions with the other female contemporaries (Donna, Felicia, Rachel) even if the three didn't always interact with one another. Writing her off in the fall of 1994 severed one of the main connections/bridges with the different orbits.  Irony that the show didn't see her value.
    • Which is why I feel that when they do introduce that family it will more than likely be Jacob's family. Otherwise why establish them slowly but surely?
    • ROFL.  priceless.   There are also countless mentions how wonderful Claire is, but I could not stomach watching a compilation of that!
    • The air...is looooooooooong gone.  
    • From what I remeber reading, it seemed as if it all completely falls apart post-Labine and Mayer around a year later when Ben is sent to prison around June 1976. Ben's departure undoes one of the major story threads that had carried the show for many months. Without a catalyst of Ben's ilk in the wings, there wasn't much to carry either story for the two women (Betsy and Arlene). Arlene was briefly paired in a one-sided attraction with Ray before becoming involved with Ian Russell. I believe the Schneiders introduced Ian as a suave businessman interested in Arlene who was also considering a dalliance with Meg. That would have been delightful but Upton arrives and quickly shifts the narrative to Arlene as a kept woman / prostitute (though I only think she was sleeping with Ian, but maybe I'm wrong).  I think it is Upton who transitioned Ben from complicated heel with a romantic appeal to a tortured, brooding romantic lead with a complicated past. I'm not sure that was the smartest move. Upton must have believed that Ben's near rape was his redemption arc, but I don't think it was enough. There is something deliciously wicked about Ben becoming involved with Mia after the death of Mia's stepson Jim Marriott, who had confessed his love for Mia before racing off on his motorbike and being hit by Ben's car. I could see the appeal, but I don't think it completely worked.  There should have been an angle involving Betsy (who had been a reporter I think when she first appeared) investigating Jim Marriott's accident, possibly with Jamie Rolins who was I believe district attorney. Betsy and Ben growing closer as Betsy grows closer to the truth. Ben confiding in Mia as Andrew continues to make Ben his surrogate son setting in motion the same dramatic situation with Andew's second wife being in love with his son/surrogate son.  I think Betsy and Jamie Rollins were together while Ben was in prison, but I don't think they had much to do. I may be wrong. Meg should have gone after custody making it seem like Jamie and/or Betsy were unfit leading to a case with social services which would have brought Diana Lamont back into the mix causing emotional angst for Diana as she works with Jamie to provide him the child she couldn't.  The Felicia / Eddie / Charles stuff seems rather generic once you get to Charles' paralysis and sexual dysfunction. Felicia's pregnancy and her death seemed to bring an end to a story that really wasn't strong enough to be frontburner. The Lynn Henderson stuff always seems rather movie of the week rather than developed for an ongoing story.  In the past, I agreed that it might have been possible that the story had become so disjointed that they needed to freshen up and add new story elements as Upton did but others have suggested that the elements themselves should have just been considered.   For example, I'm not a huge proponent of Rick and Cal as a couple, but I do think there was some mileage of actually reintroducing Barbara into the mix trying to reconnect with Hank, carrying a torch for Rick, causing conflict in the Sterlings marriage with Bruce and Van taking sides over Barbara vs. Cal, and Barbara maneuvering her way into the Beaver Ridge Complex making her business partners with Rick and Meg, which would give her a new rival.  When Ben returned, there should have been a question of how true his redemption was rather than just jumping in head first to a new role.  I think the Schneiders might have been script writers for Ann Marcus on "Search for Tomorrow," but I may be wrong on that.  Upton introduced the Marriotts in Janaury, 1977. Christian Marlowe's Andy Marriott seemed to be in the mold of Ben. I don't know if the story was any good, but I think Upton towards the end hinted an Andrew / Meg / Andy storyline which I thought would have been interesting. I think Upton had some interesting concepts, but from my understand, the execution was awful. 
    • Is there a new drinking game I don't know about?
    • But... the air of mystery and intrigue as they say it...
    • Chelsea wore this Episode #39, April 21, 2025, to watch the family karaoke. https://wornontv.net/508945/ https://shopafrm.com/products/shailene-dress-pink-petal

      Please register in order to view this content

      Preview of the upcoming May 10, 2025 Saturday Night Live: Régine Chassagne of "Arcade Fire" will wear the  same pink petal sheer mesh print but a top instead of a dress (Editorialist link) or (Nordstrom link) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHUNjOYjBOg screengrab of youtube:
    • I didn't wanna "ruin" it for you if Raven hadn't left on her midnight trip to London yet.  But based on where she's going -- and who she'll be staying with -- you can assume there will be some drama when she returns! I believe she even says to Logan or Eliot Dorn before she leaves, "My stepfather, Ansel Scott, always had a 'thing' for me!" lol.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy