Jump to content

What was the fatal blow to your show?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

The Rick Webber rewrite was definitely huge but I think Ethan being a Spencer was the biggest WTF. Ethan fit in perfectly to be the child of Robert and Holly. The timeline was perfect for when Holly was believed dead but was really in a coma. The Australian con-artist was carrying around a picture of Robert and Luke and so I just *knew* Ethan was a Scorpio. I even thought, there is no way TPTB would mess around with Luke & Laura's (the biggest couple ever) history like that. I was positive Ethan would be revealed a Scorpio. Then they had some nonchalant episode where Ethan gets a text saying he's Luke's son. WTF? I was so mad that I turned off GH right then and never turned it on again. :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Oh its definetly regression. The show takes 2 steps forward and then 5 steps back. After the first 3 or 4 times, it becomes laughable and not worth watching bc you know the predictable outcome of the stories. I actually thought both Brooke and Taylor worked quite well with Nick initially and its ending those and going back to the triangle with Ridge, that's ultimately ruined them.

Oh and another thing that needs to be mentioned is that ever since Brooke slept with Deacon, the show has been one scandal after the other. Too many outrageous sexual stunts done for shock value, and they keep trying to top themselves by trying to find out ridiculous ways to justify so and so sleeping with someone they have no business being with. This current thing with Brooke and Thomas may have been controversial 10 years ago, but now? Everyone expcted it the minute he went through puberty bc its whats expected of the current incestuous tone of the soap show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agreed. The last time I was really into AMC and thought it was pretty great was Edmund's death, when Brooke was brought to the forefront. Shortly after though, it all fell apart. Her departure combined with Zendall eating the show was what killed it IMO. Thorsten may be popular, but for my money, he didn't have the kind of chemistry with Minshew to justify the show revolving around them.

I always thought Minshew was better with Jacob Young and Thorsten Kaye did his best work against Eva LaRue.

ITA! Passions was NEVER the same once Timmy was gone. And I do agree that the endless storylines with NO payoff didn't help either.

I couldn't disagree with you more there. I really liked FMB's AMC and thought AMC was pitch-perfect from '94-'98. After that, it was never quite the same for me, though they did have periods of greatness.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

I forgot all about Juan Pablo, one of the WORST characters of all-time.

Ok a couple of issues here:

1. Frankie's murder, while gruesome and unnecessary, was not the fatal blow. She was always a second tier character who was generally well-liked and while some may consider it the fatal blow for Cass (I don't- I preferred Lila anyway, who came after), I don't think it was fatal to the show.

2. John Bolger & Robin Christopher were NEVER a fan-fave couple and quite honestly, I don't know how you ever got that impression. Bolger was not even a popular character and RC was always considered an inadequate replacement for the far superior Alicia Coppola. Some characters just cannot be recast because a certain performer leaves an indelible stamp on the role. Coppola's Lorna is one of them.

3. Robert Kelker-Kelly was universally disliked in his second go-round on the show and Matt Crane had zero story at the time of his departure, so those exits had minimal impact.

IMO, the departures that REALLY hurt the show were Anne Heche and Paul Michael Valley. Heche leaving was a HUGE blow, as she was a major presence as Vicky and while Buchanan eventually became popular I guess, she didn't have the fire or ferocity Heche had and never filled the gaping hole she left behind. PMV leaving a few years later was the nail in the coffin for many, if not me.

Honestly, though, AW never really had a death blow for me. I enjoyed the hell out of the final 2 years and the show still had some of the greatest characters in daytime, like Rachel, Donna, Felicia, and Cass. Ferguson & Crane's returns as Amanda & Matthew, Ellen Wheeler's return as Marley, Alice Barret's return as Anne, and Lisa Peluso coming on as Lila Roberts also helped make the show great again.

The only thing missing was Heche and it was that way from her final airdate on, so I'd say she was the true death blow.

I think the Matthews leaving definitely impacted the show and changed it very much. But A LOT of GREAT stuff came after that, like Harding Lemay's tenure, Rachel/Mac/Iris, St. Croix, etc... It wasn't the death blow by any means.

Here's mine:

Santa Barbara- Marcy Walker's departure in 1991. The show never was the same without Eden and it wasn't ever going to be. Yes, you can point to the Dobson's being locked out of the building in 1988 as a HUGE death blow to the show and certainly where the show lost its way. It still had some strong stories and an excellent cast when they were gone, but it lost some of its cache. Their return in 91 was too little, too late, as Walker was leaving and they were saddled with a terrible storyline for her departure. They did their best and I think had they stayed on longer, the show probably would have recovered.

But the real nail in the coffin was them vacating the head writer spot and being replaced by Pam Long. The Paul Rauch/Pam Long combo was just all kinds of wrong for SB and they never really "got" the show. Bringing on the Walkers and allowing Kim Zimmer to eat the show didn't help matters either, as most SB fans already didn't care for Zimmer (she was often in competition with Marcy at the Emmys and just not liked by most SB fans). SO MANY things were wrong about SB's final year that can be attributed to Pam Long- the Walker family, Cruz's daughter with Jodie (BJ), Warren/BJ coupling, the DiAngelis BS, Eileen Davidson as Kelly (one of the WORST recasts of all time), the Cruz/Kelly pairing, Mason & Julia being backburnered, the list goes on and on. The only thing the show did right was pair Ted & Angela together (Michael Brainard & Nina Arveson were dynamite) and they even mucked that up by having Ted marry Lily in the end.

B&B- Thorne & Brooke breaking up in a day and her going back to her obsession with Ridge. Brooke had come SO FAR as a character that for them to regress her and have her chase Ridge again was shameful. KKL & Winsor Harmon had the most intense, electric chemistry I've ever seen on B&B and probably would be in the top 10 soap couples of all-time as far as chemistry goes. The fact that B&B never paired them up again is ridiculous and the show never recovered from their breakup IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Y&R- For me it was when Lynn Marie Latham took over. The show still has not been able to recover from her horrible reign of terror!

B&B- For me it is the endless Brooke/Taylor/Ridge. It is funny how Brad can never write for anyone else.

ATWT- Death of Douglas Marland, and then the whole Kasnoff family with Mark, Mike and Sarah, and Zoe crap. The whole David Steinbeck crap, and Lucinda being written off.

GL- Time traveling Reva. I didn't mind cloned Reva, but Time traveling Reva was enough. I also got sick of the Santos, and San Cristobal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

GH - The yearly Quartermaine Dismissal

This family slowly but surely, became the heart of GH. Everyone was connected to them in some way or another, from family, to relationships...the Quartermaines had a part everywhere on the canvas. But then Guza started to treat them as the foundation to build up his pet projects Sonny, Jason, and Carly. Jason worked really well in the beginning, the whole troubled Quartermaine angle worked..but instead of treating him like the "thug" he was, they constantly had the Quartermaines propping him up to be some God, and often times at the expense of the Quartermaines themselves. Its become a joke, when sweeps come...everyone fears for the worst, and starts counting down till the next Quartermaine bites the dust. We've lost AJ, Lila, Alan, Justus, Jake, Alan, Emily, Ned, Skye, Dillon...and basically Monica and Edward. If Tracey wasn't married to Luke, her ass would be gone to. It is ridiculous. This family could have been so much more, they flourished in the 90's and into the mid 00's, around them the show had some of its best moments in the past decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm a bit softer on Brad: I think it's both. Problem is that storytelling has sped so much in the last ten years that the back and forth has gotten extremely exhausting. Brad's strokes of genius which he has every once in a while are simply overwritten by it.

As a backdrop those constants in LA are very good to produce a good show but you have to have some characters on the sidelines which are pivotal and evolve. Like on Y&R where Ashley, Victor, Nikki, Jack all have NEVER changed. They're still as pathetic on many levels as they were in the 80s when it comes to their love lifes. But characters like Lauren (before she became Mrs. Stepford), Brad or Traci have really grown and matured and are interlinked with the contsant interlopers as lovers or family. This is missing on B&B where nobody gets wiser: case in point Amber!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To be fair though Victor/Nikki/Jack/Ashley have changed. They all still do & say stupid things but Brooke/Ridge/Taylor is just ridiculous. Whenever Brooke/Ridge or Taylor/Ridge reunite it's just to reunite there's never any real repercussions or any progress as far as their relationships go. Pretty much the endgame IS the story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Correct me if Im wrong, Victor/Nikki/Ashley triangle hasnt been a constant presence on the show since it started right? Ever since the Brooke/Ridge/Taylor triangle started 21 years ago, it feels as if the writers go there every single year. The only real long break from it was the 2 and a half years that Taylor was dead between 2002 and 2005. Other than that, it's teased and flat out done all the time. Even when they move onto other partners (Thorne, Nick, Whip, etc...) it doesnt seem to last long at all before this triangle kicks up yet again. I dont know Y&R's history like that but I didnt think V/N/A was as consistently done like these 3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Only to an extent.

The triangle's been an extremely significant part of the characters lives but all three characters have (at one time or another) legit moved on to separate relationships. Not dead end romances like Whip/Brooke or Taylor/Rick but functional successful relationships outside of the N/V/A triangle.

With Ridge, Brooke & Taylor the story is just winning Ridge.

Exactly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's only been in the last ten years that they haven't allowed Ridge's siblings to have any stories whatsoever. They don't seem to realize that Ridge having no real family (I can't count worthless Eric, and Stephanie is more like his wife) just hurts the character. Meanwhile the people they DID bring back family for, like Brooke, didn't need it, and I can't think of one time that the recasts of Katie, Storm, or Donna (not even getting into the Beth fiasco) helped Brooke's story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I feel like the lawsuit storyline was resolved quickly because the show didn’t want to spring for more sets.
    • It's been a while, but we have seen the foyer to Bill and Hayley's house as well as the exterior entrance to their house. The foyer was first seen in the premiere episode when Hayley met Vanessa at the house.
    • There's still a year or two before Larkin arrives. Joel is there already. EON does noticeably youthify, although I think they carry it off. Admittedly I haven't seen most of the Jody stories, which from what people here have said aren't great.
    • I don't mind the actor who plays Brian. He's fine. The problem for me is that Paige seems so wishy wishy. She doesn't seem to have much of a personality at this point so I don't see why Brian would be so besotted with her. She just lurches from one trauma to the next. Granted, it's only been a month, but she's not as vibrant as April or even Deborah who has had minimal screen time by this point.  I do worry about the influence of GH on the show since I'm in fall of 1979 and characters have conversations and there's not the drive to "youthify" the show. However, I think Marceau (sp?) is gone. He was given a rather tame sendoff. How long was the actor on the show? I hope this is not a sign of things to come. I worry the show is setting up a murder mystery around one of my favorite characters and I will be mightily annoyed. I also noticed in recent Search for Tomorrow episodes uploaded to YT that the actors playing Logan and Eliot showed up. I don't watch the show but they were in the screencaps. When does Larkin Malloy show up or has he already left? Joel Crothers hasn't shown up either unless I've blinked and missed him.
    • Dr Linden. She treated Vanessa's drug addiction (although Vanessa seemed to forget that by Henry's suicide attempt) , and she's mentioned during Reva's PPD. Although I can't recall if she's actually shown right off the top of my head. She probably was temporarily shelved when Sonni was a therapist (between her crazy times) And I think Billy sees her after he falls off the wagon after Reva's death.
    • Kinda agree. I have some issues with the sets. Nicole's living room is bland-looks like a display home. Bill and Hayley's is too small and basically hideous. And neither of them have a front door/entrance or staircase. People just appear from the corridor. Those green accents  at Uptown are way too much. Also,Naomi and Vanessa not having an office or a home .
    • Thanks @Paul Raven  That Grainger story always reads like hog-wild melodrama, not very similar to the more subtle stories for Rita in her last few years. I wonder how Lenore played the material.
    • More from 1976 Lynn, apparently making every effort to overcome her alcoholism, accepts a baby-sitting job. However, when the baby starts crying, Lynn begins to get nervous and takes one drink, then another. By the time Bruce and Van arrive home, Lynn is on the floor, ineffectually trying to find the doctor’s number, sure the baby is ill. When the mother arrives; she vows to let everyone know what goes on in the mayor’s house.Bruce insists that Lynn has to go, but Van, learning that Lynn can’t remember drinking the cooking sherry, calls Joe to report Lynn’s blackouts. Joe wants her institutionalized but gives in to Van’ s pleas that Lynn needs loving attention. Eddie has sent some of Felicia’s work to a New |York gallery owner and reports to Charles that Lisa Cooper wants to exhibit Felicia’s work. Charles refuses to tell her this and later admits he feels he has “cowed”her attention because of his being confined to a wheelchair. What Charles doesn’t say is: that he’s plagued with fears she’ll leave him for another man. Felicia is exuberant as she starts painting again. She tells Charles how she feels about it, but, jealous of anyone or anything that takes attention from him, Charles tries to undermine her confidence. Eddie finally professes his love for her. He will be happy to step forward if she will only let Be and admit that they belong together. Charles tries to stop Felicia’s ‘trip to New York by making her doubt her own work, and when that fails, he finds business reasons at his bookshop to keep Di, his ex-wife, who is running it for him, from accompanying her. Felicia finally decides it’s not going to work and tells Eddie they might as well call it off. Instead, he arranges for Lisa Cooper to come to Rosehill. Charles is rude and insulting to Lisa when she arrives at the house to view Felicia’s work, and his derogatory remarks about shady gallery dealings prompt Lisa to tell Eddie that living in such an atmosphere could permanently stunt an artist’s development; if Felicia is subjected to this indefinitely, it’s not even worth Lisa’s while to take her on as a client. Felicia finally decides she can’t be torn apart any longer and must accede to Charles’s demands. She tells Eddie her career is over and she won’t paint any more, breaks down in his arms, crying bitterly, then pulls away, unwilling to acknowledge that her feelings for him are deeper than she dare face. Charles is delighted when she prepares to dispose of her art supplies, insisting everything will be fine once she has accepted that this part of her life is over. But she cannot do it. She promises him that he can set the limits and terms, but she must paint. Arlene discovers that her mother is planning to avoid the surgery she needs, and the accompanying medical bills, by leaving Rosehill and moving in with her sister Dorothy out west. Arlene manages to prevent this by calling her aunt and telling her the truth about Carrie’s condition. Dr. Tom Crawford has been footing the costs of Carrie’s presurgery tests, but Arlene knows that Carrie won’t like this. So she tells Carrie that David Hart, the son of Meg’s late husband, the former mayor, has heard about their plight and forwarded the money as a gesture of friendship, to be repaid when possible. To convince Carrie that she does indeed have the money, Arlene asks Ray to just lend it to her for a few hours, so she can convince Carrie and then immediately return it. Ray instructs her to get dressed for a night on the town and takes her, out implying that the money will be waiting at the end of the evening. When Ian Russell happens to join them, Arlene doesn’t suspect anything is afoot, but when e Ray suddenly leaves, she becomes furious, realizing what he’s done. But she finds Mr: Russell a distinguished and cultured man, and decides there’s no harm in having a drink. After cocktails and stimulating conversation, Ian suggests that they go to his place, and Arlene agrees. But when they get there, Ian matter of factly suggests that they skip the preliminaries and get on with it. Ian is embarrassed and annoyed to discover that Arlene is not a professional call girl and that Ray didn’t explain to her the purpose of their |meeting. He is apologetic and solicitous, until Arlene, explaining why Ray felt he could pull this on her, mentions her sick mother in need of an operation. Ian starts to laugh at this overworked standard line, and a livid Arlene storms out of his apartment. Thinking it over, Ian decides he’s more intrigued with Arlene than he is annoyed at Ray, and calls Ray for her telephone number. But Arlene is not delighted to hear from him, and he has to use a good deal of soothing charm before she agrees to have dinner with him at one of the better local restaurants.During dinner Ian again apologizes for his mistake, and he gives Arlene a diamond pendant as a token of his gratitude for her forgiving him. Ray arrives to interrupt an otherwise enjoyable evening with a business matter, and quietly reminds Arlene that Ian is his customer and she’s not to cut herself in with him. At home, Arlene examines the pendant and is convinced that it’s genuine. She hides it in her dresser drawer, unable to bring herself to show it to her mother.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy