Jump to content

Cancellation Most Devastating to Genre: GL, ATWT, AMC, or OLTL?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Out of the four long-running soaps that were canceled in recent years--GL, ATWT, AMC, & OLTL--which of these soap's demise hurt the genre the most? My answer to this question would have to be ATWT, which is somewhat ironic, given that its cancellation attracted (by far) the least amount of press and uproar.

I expect many people to say that GL's cancellation was the most devastating. To support their position, these folks will say that the axing of GL set in motion a domino effect. However, GL (like AW before it) had been teetering on the edge of cancellation for over a decade, so its demise surprised nobody. On the other hand, ATWT was the first long-running soap to be cancelled after only a few years of dismal ratings. It's cancellation was a watershed moment in the industry because it sent out the following message, loud and clear: networks were no longer going to wait for a soap to have miserable ratings for many years before axing it; rather, all soaps that are currently garnering bad ratings are in grave danger (and are out of "second chances" for them to try and boost their ratings).

Thus, I maintain that it was the cancellation of ATWT (rather than of GL) that set in motion the domino effect of these other soap axings. After all, every single long-running soap (aside from GL) all had one thing in common: they had decent ratings prior to circa 2007-08, and their cancellations (back then) would have been unthinkable. The fact that CBS didn't hesitate yanking ATWT convinced those at ABC to go ahead and cancel the Nixon soaps. This, in turn, has put all remaining soaps (apart from Y&R) in grave danger.

Before I conclude, I'd like to add that AMC's cancellation was the second-most devastating cancellation for the genre. Aside from those who follow the soap ratings, the general perception among the public is that AMC (like GH and DOOL) is still "extremely popular." (Of course, the reality couldn't be further from the truth, given that AMC, GH, & DOOL all have terrible ratings.) Once an "extremely popular" soap like AMC gets canceled, it's obvious to most people that the genre's days are numbered. (However, I still believe that ATWT's cancellation was more significant than AMC's. Remember, ATWT was the first soap to be canceled that didn't teeter on the edge of cancellation for many years. Had the domino effect that ATWT's cancellation caused not taken place, I highly doubt that ABC would have been so eager to pull the plug on a soap that they made a huge effort to save a mere two years ago.)

Additionally, I would have to state that the least devastating cancellation was that of OLTL. While the cancellation of two soaps on one day sent major shockwaves through the soap industry, one needs to look at what would have happened if OLTL alone had been axed (when analyzing how devastating its cancellation was). First of all, aside from the die-hard OLTL fans, it's apparent that OLTL's demise surprised no one: it was obvious the writing was on the wall the moment ABC moved AMC to L.A. (and made other huge investments in that show) while choosing to leave OLTL in NYC. Given that (1) this cancellation came as no surprise (to all but the shows most die-hard fans) and (2) OLTL has extremely low name recognition among non-soap viewers, there likely would have been a "ho-hum" reaction (similar to the GL/ATWT cancellations) had OLTL alone been canceled back in April. In fact, I'd doubt there'd even be much panic in the industry if OLTL alone was axed: rather, the consenus would be that survival of the fittest had occurred, and that the five most "powerful" brands--AMC, B&B, DOOL, GH, and Y&R--would continue to remain on the air (all being based in Los Angeles) until at least 2015.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

This entire thing is subjective. You can't seriously gauge which soap's cancellation was the most devastating blow to the genre when FOUR soaps were canceled within 2 years. However, if any soap's cancellation can be credited for getting the wrecking ball swinging to the genre, that would be Another World. It set the ball rolling to the point where NBC only has one lonely daytime drama on the air... and 5 hours of the Today show.

Let's face it. It set the precedent. ABC is now planning on hours upon hours of talk/information... with one lone soap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No doubt if OLTL has been cancelled alone, it wouldn't have been a big deal. However, I don't think it can be said enough that the only reason AMC's cancellation made news and had legs in the media is the Susan Lucci factor. Without her, AMC is no more important to the mainstream media than OLTL is. As for which was most devastating, for me it was ATWT, and it was my least favorite of the four shows! It was the first megasoap, just the first enormously successful show, and from what I read, it still had some energy left to it. GL was on life support for years before it was mercifully cancelled. AMC and OLTL are just hollow shells of their former selves, with their cores gutted to the point of unrecognizability, especially AMC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The most devasting for me was ATWT. It was my show. The most devasting for the genre would have to be GL/ATWT/AMC. All three were the most devasting to the genre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

bc it was so long ago and really didnt trigger a downward spiral. Daytime sustained years beyond that. I think ATWT was really the beginning of the end. GL felt like it was on borrowed time anyway for a long while, but I didnt feel as if ATWT, AMC or OLTL needed to be cancelled. None seemed beyond repair

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You have an excellent point regarding AW's cancellation. While few if anybody thought back in 1999 that AW's cancellation would endanger the entire soap genre, the scenario that you mentioned above would have never happened had AW not been canceled (and repalced with such a crappy "soap").

In hindsight, I definately should had listed AW as an option. (The reason why I chose not to was because I wanted to focus on the recent cancellations of long-running soaps.) Could one of the moderators please change this thread's subject/topic heading so that AW appears as another choice? (I myself cannot go back and change the heading of this thread.)

Here are my own thoughts on how AW's cancellation would rank (alongside the others): For the reasons R. Sinclair mentioned above, AW's cancellation had a devastating impact on the genre; its demise hurt the genre much more than if OLTL alone had been canceled (earlier this year). However, the cancellations of ATWT and AMC were more devastating because AW (1) teetered on the edge of extinction for over a decade prior to getting the axe (unlike ATWT or AMC), and (2) was certainly not considered to be "extremely popular" in recent times (the way AMC was/is).

I personally feel that AW's demise was far sadder than GL's because the quality of the former soap was so much better (in 1999) than the latter (in 2009). (AW was on a creative upswing, while GL looked like a high-school production.) However, GL's cancellation was probably more devastating for the genre because (1) that show was the longest-running program in broadcast history, and (2) GL would usually have over a million more viewers than AW did (during AW's final two decades on the air).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's a myth.

Another World ended in June 1999

Sunset Beach ended December 1999

Port Charles ended October 2003

Three soaps canceled within four years? Everyone is kidding themselves into believing that network television didn't start trying to find "other options" for their daytime lineups until 2009's cancellation of Guiding Light. Especially when ABC gave back the 30 minutes that was for Port Charles (in already limited markets) back to its affiliates. Here in the NYC/CT/NJ tristate area, it's been syndicated Who Wants to be a Millionaire for the last 8 years!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Its not a myth; its an opinion. After AW, 2 relatively new soaps got canned. I dont think losing neither SuBe or PC had as much impact as longtime soaps like GL, ATWT, AMC and OLTL have. None was touched for about a decade, so no I dont think AW triggered a downward spiral.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the cancellations of SuBe and PC were about the networks realizing, once and for all, that the big soap phenomenon was over and some downsizing had to be done. NBC and ABC, at least. The core four (AMC, OLTL, GH, and DAYS) were saved because they still had ratings potential, while I'm guessing PSNS was kept around because it was still new and NBC (gasp!) might have wanted to give them time to build up an audience. SuBe and PC were simply fat that had to be trimmed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • What else? #May4th

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • In my usual account on my most used video hosting site with the video title  DAYS 1-8-15 Will & Paul Sex This is an edit I began when I was first teaching myself to edit & at that time I couldn't make it do what I wanted it to do. I pulled it up & finished it this morning. 
    • Or Megan is shot as retaliation for Dave's unpaid gambling debts...while Julie confesses she's the biological mother of Special Guest Star Barry Bostwick's little boy.
    • Finland seemed such an odd choice for a location shoot. ATWT went to Greece and later Spain while GL had Tenerife and there were others in that timeframe. But Finland not being a known tourist destination or offering the tropical/sunny atmosphere usually associated with location shoots seems off brand. Maybe they were negotiating a deal with a tourist association and it fell through.
    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy