Members danfling Posted December 26, 2018 Members Share Posted December 26, 2018 Chuck was the biological father of Palmer John. Palmer was not Palmer John's biological father, but he was not Andrew's either. I had been hoping for many years that someone would have rescued Palmer John from the fire, reared him, and that he would return to Pine Valley. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Pine Charles Posted December 28, 2018 Members Share Posted December 28, 2018 (edited) I read up - Palmer John was conceived in Switzerland when Donna & Chuck we’re trapped in a cave after an avalanche in the Alps. They both thought they were going to die. Edited December 28, 2018 by Pine Charles 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Pine Charles Posted December 30, 2018 Members Share Posted December 30, 2018 (edited) This is for Jonathan and AllMyShadows: Edited December 30, 2018 by Pine Charles 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Paul Raven Posted December 30, 2018 Members Share Posted December 30, 2018 Am I seeing a little Penelope Cruz in some of those shots?? Susan looks great with the short cut. She really should go with that length now as the long locks look dated on her . 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Pine Charles Posted December 30, 2018 Members Share Posted December 30, 2018 Yes, it really did look fabulous on her. This was a photo shoot for the Having It All book (1997). Please register in order to view this content 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members All My Shadows Posted December 31, 2018 Members Share Posted December 31, 2018 (edited) Thanks! You know I had to mute it and play Lluvia de Primavera over it instead. Edited December 31, 2018 by All My Shadows 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Jonathan Posted January 1, 2019 Members Share Posted January 1, 2019 YES! One of my fav looks of La Lucci's! Thanks! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members pdm1974 Posted January 2, 2019 Members Share Posted January 2, 2019 I did watch the revival online after being a fan of the original and while it couldn't replace the original, I did think it had some potential. The David/Angie connection was one that would have been interesting to see play out. I also loved Miranda and AJ. The Cassandra story was beyond depressing. For those of you who watched it, what do you think were the pros and cons? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members John Posted January 3, 2019 Members Share Posted January 3, 2019 Cons were some of the actors were too green but mostly it was the business side didnt have their crap together if they had both AMC & OLTL could still be going strong 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members pdm1974 Posted January 3, 2019 Members Share Posted January 3, 2019 Also, I think a few more years later and the shows could have been much more successful online. Now, most people don't think twice about streaming their content on demand, but even back as soon as 2013 it was still sort of a new concept for most. I'd love to see (I know it's a dream) to see either AMC or OLTL rebooted again online now. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Faulkner Posted January 3, 2019 Members Share Posted January 3, 2019 I wouldn’t put it past someone: producers are scavenging in their junk drawers for established IP of any kind right now. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members pdm1974 Posted January 3, 2019 Members Share Posted January 3, 2019 I would love to see a company like Netflix with real cash reboot it even if it was for much shorter number of episodes per season. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Faulkner Posted January 3, 2019 Members Share Posted January 3, 2019 Yeah, my guess is it wouldn’t be stylized or produced as a traditional soap in the multi-camera, five-times-a-week sense. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Vee Posted January 3, 2019 Members Share Posted January 3, 2019 (edited) AMC 2.0 on Hulu was the best soap of 2013, and probably the best soap of the 2010s so far if I'm being mean. OLTL 2.0 had its issues but was not far behind. Both shows were modern and forward-thinking, and if they'd had proper upper management would still be on Hulu or Netflix. They were the future of our soaps, and the rest of the remaining soaps learned nothing from them. So they have no future. You could put those shows on streaming in a packaged/seasonal arc deal - say, 20-40 eps in one period at a time - and do it today. The time, the social climate, etc. is ripe IMO, especially for OLTL. But they won't. Edited January 3, 2019 by Vee 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members pdm1974 Posted January 3, 2019 Members Share Posted January 3, 2019 Also, shows now need to only produce 35 episodes a year to be considered for Daytime Emmy consideration. A nice even 40, one hour shows, with a smaller focused cast, could be great. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.