Jump to content

AMC and OLTL Canceled!


Recommended Posts

  • Members

As much as I like OLTL, I'm not in the camp that it should be saved. I want to see it establish end game in it's remaining months and have a good finale. After 43 years, it's hard to see where else the show can go.

Any energy should be focused on having classic episodes made available online, there is plenty of stuff available that would be of interest to soap fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Webmaster

Not a problem. My question was genuine in that I seriously want fans to truly think about what they can do to save their soaps. The first instinct is to blast the network, the executives, threaten to boycott, gather a list of sponsors, call, complain, etc, but nothing ever comes of it. So I was asking what people can do if they truly thought it out. I know what we'll be doing at Soap Opera Network, but I truly want to know what soap fans think they can do beyond the first instinct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not to come off as lazy or crass, but at this point I don't think there is anything that can be done to save these two shows or any of the 4 remaining shows. The point of no return in my mind was crossed years, if not a decade ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There wasn't a lack of outcry about ATWT because there was nothing anyone could do about it - it was obvious as soon as GL was canceled. I don't believe that ATWT ending caused OLTL or AMC to go. That was in the planning stages for a long time. If ABC was less wildly incompetent and less consistent in failing again and again and again and again in both daytime and primetime, OLTL probably would have been gone several years ago, and AMC before the LA move.

Anyone who ever does try to do anything about a soap being canceled, even if it's just writing a letter to a network, is often sneered at, and dismissed as delusional or desperate or unable to get with modern times or hip programming (hip as in ABC raiding other networks for anyone they can find to prop up two timeslots they are essentially washing their hands of anyway). There's always a stigma to being a soap fan, not just from society in general, but, as soaps have become less prominent in pop culture, from a lot of other soap fans.

It's easier to just accept it, both because that's seen as the cool thing to do, and also because there's no real way of changing this.

So the future of TV is essentially a Hugh Hefner girlfriend going on Dancing With the Stars and saying she can't be elegant because she has her period. Or Kirstie Alley falling down. Or some MTV puppets punching each other and everyone around them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh I know its not Eric, because while I don't think their efforts will amount to anything, I don't think I've ever once been critical of soap fans trying to fight to keep their shows alive. Its one thing for the online fandom to be critical of the "delusioned" and "out of touch" soap fans, but when you have a network trying to run and hide from the opinions of the people that basically indirectly pay the bills of your daytime bloc.... there's something hideously wrong. Like many have asked, just who does Brian Scott Frons think is going to watch something called "The Chew?" I know, I know.... extensive audience research tells them there is a market out there.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The rumormill says "she cancelled all three soaps" but Frons saved one (GH) in his video he said point blank GH is safe "for now." Rumor also has it that Disney wants GH gone by 2012 Some say January others September. Part of Frons job as HOD is to develop new programming that is what he was hired to do from jump. So where in daytime was he suppose to put this "new programming."

I first read rumors of cancellation in 2003. Also rumors during the time of Soapnet, that Frons wanted to move the soaps to soapnet with a smaller cast to lessen production cost .I thought that was why soapnet was created to eventually move soaps there but since he tanked that it never happened and its been cancelled. But the first rumor I read I was booed off the stage "oh that will never happen ABC owns soaps blah blah...but its come to pass 8 years later. Personally I always thought Frons wanted soaps gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

2015? No. More like 2013 - and that could be even sooner if CBS and NBC decided "To hell with it!" and canceled the remainder of their contracts w/ DAYS, B&B and Y&R.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I remember my late mom express passionate love of the show (being that we're Irish Americans and how Johnny and Maeve Ryan reminded her of her grandfather)... and that she viewed Jillian and Mary as role models. When the show ran on SoapNet years ago, I remember watching the early episodes and having debates with my mom over how strident and militant the show was... especially in regards to feminist issues.  And how I found Mary to be a hypocrite (she's a reporter... yet can't suss out that her father and brother are both toxic and controlling)... and Jillian to not be quite a good role model (yes, she's a lawyer.. but she's happily waiting for Frank to divorce Delia and then after the divorce.. waits for him to win elections as she silently waits on the sidelines). My mom did admit that in retrospect, she did find the show to be a bit strident and explained that it was the 70s and feminism was a huge passion for her and others like her.   And that was when I learned to view soaps without a modern day lens... and eventually I did find enjoyment on the show (and their St Patrick's day celebrations were always a fun tradition).
    • Pink is a good color with her blonde hair 
    •     In a video intetview, it was Richard Backus (Barry) who said Sarah told everyone off at her goodbye party.                                                                               On the Soapnet forum, it was Sean, the MemoryBook webmaster ( he also posts here)  who told us Sarah had been fired. Everyone on the board was shocked. For some reason noobody recalled that. In more recent years, it's been easier to find old press clippings that show that her dismissal was announced in newspapers and magazines.                                      Sean also told us that many of Sarah's castmates were not sorry to see her go. One of the columns about her firing in 1980 said that Sarah "raised the ire" of her co-workers.                                        On the SN board, we were told that Sarah would speak negatively about the show to the press. For example, she reportedly criticized the show for dumping the Pat/Nancy interfaith storyline.  The network didn't like Sarah speaking out like that 
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • During Taggert Alan mentions Amanda as his "daughter" while that most likely is a writers slip up, I like to think it was a retcon. They never have Alex, on any of her frequent trips back mention Amanda as my sister, etc. I know they just want to forget it and Amanda was probematic in her marriage to Roger (i.e. MADD's decree that Roger will never be mentioned again..) Again, they could have easily brought her back with a handwave from Alex or Alan saying it was a trick from Brandon.   There is Amanda, AM and ALL the various offspring Phillip created. Plus head of family means head of Spaulding.   I would have thought it interesting if Phillip becomes more like Alan (but in the gray area he always was, not outright cartoon villain RR Alan) and AM comes back with more of his Bauer coming out and wanting to do things on the up and up..maybe AM became a lawyer like his grandfather in the missing years...and Amanda could play both sides against the other.  But also they could have brought someone like Kyle Sampson back to rival Phillip and the Spaulding (maybe Amanda married him) but then, of course there would be ANOTHER man horning after long in the tooth Reva!
    • Those descriptions of Mary Carney-- from Michael Levin --were from a magazine article in the early 1980's. In the book, he did say all three Mary replacements were bad.  
    • ^^ KKL always looks fabulous.  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Sometimes you don't have friends as much as you have family. I'm trying to remember if Dylan really had a guy  friend. He and Mindy finally became friends after a rough introduction, and he interacts with Hart#1 and A-M#1, but I'm not sure they're really "friends". Maybe David. Whereas with Bridget, because there aren't a lot of Reardons around, gets friends like Kat and David.
    •   Well at least KKL looks fabulous. https://wornontv.net/511536/

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy