Jump to content

AMC and OLTL Canceled!


Recommended Posts

  • Members

As much as I like OLTL, I'm not in the camp that it should be saved. I want to see it establish end game in it's remaining months and have a good finale. After 43 years, it's hard to see where else the show can go.

Any energy should be focused on having classic episodes made available online, there is plenty of stuff available that would be of interest to soap fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Webmaster

Not a problem. My question was genuine in that I seriously want fans to truly think about what they can do to save their soaps. The first instinct is to blast the network, the executives, threaten to boycott, gather a list of sponsors, call, complain, etc, but nothing ever comes of it. So I was asking what people can do if they truly thought it out. I know what we'll be doing at Soap Opera Network, but I truly want to know what soap fans think they can do beyond the first instinct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not to come off as lazy or crass, but at this point I don't think there is anything that can be done to save these two shows or any of the 4 remaining shows. The point of no return in my mind was crossed years, if not a decade ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There wasn't a lack of outcry about ATWT because there was nothing anyone could do about it - it was obvious as soon as GL was canceled. I don't believe that ATWT ending caused OLTL or AMC to go. That was in the planning stages for a long time. If ABC was less wildly incompetent and less consistent in failing again and again and again and again in both daytime and primetime, OLTL probably would have been gone several years ago, and AMC before the LA move.

Anyone who ever does try to do anything about a soap being canceled, even if it's just writing a letter to a network, is often sneered at, and dismissed as delusional or desperate or unable to get with modern times or hip programming (hip as in ABC raiding other networks for anyone they can find to prop up two timeslots they are essentially washing their hands of anyway). There's always a stigma to being a soap fan, not just from society in general, but, as soaps have become less prominent in pop culture, from a lot of other soap fans.

It's easier to just accept it, both because that's seen as the cool thing to do, and also because there's no real way of changing this.

So the future of TV is essentially a Hugh Hefner girlfriend going on Dancing With the Stars and saying she can't be elegant because she has her period. Or Kirstie Alley falling down. Or some MTV puppets punching each other and everyone around them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh I know its not Eric, because while I don't think their efforts will amount to anything, I don't think I've ever once been critical of soap fans trying to fight to keep their shows alive. Its one thing for the online fandom to be critical of the "delusioned" and "out of touch" soap fans, but when you have a network trying to run and hide from the opinions of the people that basically indirectly pay the bills of your daytime bloc.... there's something hideously wrong. Like many have asked, just who does Brian Scott Frons think is going to watch something called "The Chew?" I know, I know.... extensive audience research tells them there is a market out there.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The rumormill says "she cancelled all three soaps" but Frons saved one (GH) in his video he said point blank GH is safe "for now." Rumor also has it that Disney wants GH gone by 2012 Some say January others September. Part of Frons job as HOD is to develop new programming that is what he was hired to do from jump. So where in daytime was he suppose to put this "new programming."

I first read rumors of cancellation in 2003. Also rumors during the time of Soapnet, that Frons wanted to move the soaps to soapnet with a smaller cast to lessen production cost .I thought that was why soapnet was created to eventually move soaps there but since he tanked that it never happened and its been cancelled. But the first rumor I read I was booed off the stage "oh that will never happen ABC owns soaps blah blah...but its come to pass 8 years later. Personally I always thought Frons wanted soaps gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

2015? No. More like 2013 - and that could be even sooner if CBS and NBC decided "To hell with it!" and canceled the remainder of their contracts w/ DAYS, B&B and Y&R.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • During Taggert Alan mentions Amanda as his "daughter" while that most likely is a writers slip up, I like to think it was a retcon. They never have Alex, on any of her frequent trips back mention Amanda as my sister, etc. I know they just want to forget it and Amanda was probematic in her marriage to Roger (i.e. MADD's decree that Roger will never be mentioned again..) Again, they could have easily brought her back with a handwave from Alex or Alan saying it was a trick from Brandon.   There is Amanda, AM and ALL the various offspring Phillip created. Plus head of family means head of Spaulding.   I would have thought it interesting if Phillip becomes more like Alan (but in the gray area he always was, not outright cartoon villain RR Alan) and AM comes back with more of his Bauer coming out and wanting to do things on the up and up..maybe AM became a lawyer like his grandfather in the missing years...and Amanda could play both sides against the other.  But also they could have brought someone like Kyle Sampson back to rival Phillip and the Spaulding (maybe Amanda married him) but then, of course there would be ANOTHER man horning after long in the tooth Reva!
    • Those descriptions of Mary Carney-- from Michael Levin --were from a magazine article in the early 1980's. In the book, he did say all three Mary replacements were bad.  
    • ^^ KKL always looks fabulous.  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Sometimes you don't have friends as much as you have family. I'm trying to remember if Dylan really had a guy  friend. He and Mindy finally became friends after a rough introduction, and he interacts with Hart#1 and A-M#1, but I'm not sure they're really "friends". Maybe David. Whereas with Bridget, because there aren't a lot of Reardons around, gets friends like Kat and David.
    •   Well at least KKL looks fabulous. https://wornontv.net/511536/

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • There was something about her being kidnapped by a Professor (?) and then presumed dead when Judi Evans left. Then somehow she ends up with Neil Everest with amnesia and being mute. Beth Chamberlain doesn't say a thing for like her first three months on the show. I sort of agree that Phillip should've been head of the family. But there's not a lot of family for him to be "head" of. Unless they could've found a better recast for Alan, I'd have been okay with him dying earlier. What Phillip really needed was an equal rival. Whether it was in the family or outside the family. And other than Roger and the first go-round with VI as Lujack, he never really had one. I'm hesitant to call Chris Bernau's Alan a rival, but he certainly was a source of conflict in Phillip's life.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • We're getting an actual personality and flaws for Ashley... so it's a good start.  I'm guessing that Derek is her first serious relationship and I think she's falling out of love with Derek.. just hasn't accepted that realization as of yet. I agree that the show was diving headfirst into an Andre/Ashley pairing in the first handful of episodes, but they backed off of it and I have two theories: - Andre/Dani had a rapport/chemistry.  Probably more so than MVJ or the writers anticipated so the show is probably exploring that avenue. - Based on the character template that Ashley was created from... having her stray with Andre would have been out of character and caused the audience to hate her so the show is now weaving in reasons why Ashley might be looking Andres way (i.e. grass is greener on the other side, inexperience, Derek being too basic/vanilla).  
    • Has anyone watched the Texas reunion interview? I haven't gotten to it yet although it'll probably mean more to the people who watched the show at the time.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy