Jump to content

DAYS: Actor & Actress OUT for Real!


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

This yes the first time I started likign Belle, MM started to light up under that story. Something was done ok under ES and HS I guess

Yeah DA was great but I love Koslow's interpretation I just love her aura and for a long time she was the only one I could stand to see AS in a scene with

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So sorry to hear Jay Kenneth Johnson(Phillip) and Shelley Hennig(Stephanie) are leaving. I hope Phillip is re-cast, Phillip is very important to the show imho. I'd bring back Kyle Brandt, who imho is just as good as JKJ. With Hennig leaving, I wonder if Mary Beth Evans will be axed as Kayla too, same goes for Judi Evans(Adrienne) & Wally Kurth(Justin). I think DAYS might re-cast Steph too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I dont want recasts for either character. I dont want to see Stephanie continue to play second fiddle to Melanie and Philip continued to be ruined and saddled with Melanie. All these characters have been written horribly to prop that bitch. Maybe they will "de-soras" Melanie and put her in Will's age group and pair her with the new Hernandez brother.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm so ok with Nathan and Stephanie leaving. But Phillip ... I love him! I wouldn't mind if they brought Kyle Brandt back. And I agree Shelle needs to come back, I'd also love to see Rex and Mimi coming back.

Maybe they will put Daniel and Carly together and they (with Melanie and the baby) leave town as a family. I really don't know what they are going to do with Chloe and Melanie now....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That is a brilliant explanation of what Kate does for the canvas. Lauren Koslow is the only actress, as far as I can recall, on DAYS who has lasted as long and with such a high profile without having a character defining lead storyline to call her own. Kate is the rich bitch of the show, a character most of daytime has forgotten about. She is a central antagonist. You can drop Kate into any storyline on the canvas and she has a role and she works.

In the last 3 years we have seen more independence and growth, writing wise, for Kate than we've seen since the character debuted in 1993. Kate's connected to the Dimeras, Vivian, Brady, Victor, Sami, Will and Roman. She's got plenty of connections and plenty of storyline left in her.

Losing Kate would be a horrendous blow to the show, she is far from dead weight and the character and actress haven't gotten the respect they've deserved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Finland seemed such an odd choice for a location shoot. ATWT went to Greece and later Spain while GL had Tenerife and there were others in that timeframe. But Finland not being a known tourist destination or offering the tropical/sunny atmosphere usually associated with location shoots seems off brand. Maybe they were negotiating a deal with a tourist association and it fell through.
    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy