Jump to content

DAYS: Actor & Actress OUT for Real!


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I have a feeling they'll recast, but if they do, they shouldn't revisit Philip and Chloe ever again. I don't even watch DAYS anymore but I was hoping they'd get back to them eventually with JKJ and Nadia both on the show again. Such a shame, I hate how soaps are missing opportunities left and right these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

why would the show ever write out Kate? Kate can do it all and always does. When they need someone to torment a romantic couple, there is Kate. When they need someone to cause trouble in the big family dynamic they have Kate. When they need someone to star in a cynical pairing that isn't true love who else but Kate can they call on? All they have to do is either bring back Lucas, or bring back another kid (and I guess Rex is on deck at this point) and the story begins again. She is in sports what is called a utility player, and that's why she glides effortlessly from Kiriakis shenanigans to DiMera fighting, to being mean to Chloe. They would get more hours of story out of bringing on a kid for Kate vs writing Kate out because she has no kids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Shelley sounds like she is ready to go, so good luck to her. That was a gracious statement she made. I am really shocked about JKJ, though. He is the definitive Philip for me. Love him and am sad to see a Kiriakis legacy character leave.

I guess it is too much to hope that Days learns something from this? That they learn to cycle through SLs better and balance out their usage of the cast? Instead of punishing those who speak out constructively and look for better opportunities elsewhere? Because it royally sucks that three actors who stepped up and showed us how exciting they could be this past week or so are now gone from Days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think Hennig is leaving for lack of exposure. She's been onscreen and driving story (albeit in a supporting role) for a long while now. I think it's more of a "Been there, done that" thing.

As for JKJ -- I think this is one of those cases where the writers made the mistake of never centering the story on his character. Phillip has had a ton of story the past few years, and he's been onscreen a lot, and he's had some great scenes, but his role in the stories has always been secondary to other people. It probably all looked good on paper, but then in execution, it's like, "Oh wait, he's just repeating the same lines while other people get the real meat." Shame to lose him, but I really do think they need to recast because the character's connections to the canvas are too important. Also -- and this probably speaks to his lack of interest -- he often seems sort of bored or disconnected onscreen to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Finland seemed such an odd choice for a location shoot. ATWT went to Greece and later Spain while GL had Tenerife and there were others in that timeframe. But Finland not being a known tourist destination or offering the tropical/sunny atmosphere usually associated with location shoots seems off brand. Maybe they were negotiating a deal with a tourist association and it fell through.
    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy