Jump to content

AMC: Shannon Kane's status?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Ack! I'm no fan of Tyler Perry especially after what he did to "For Colored Girls" but I love the thought of SK getting that kind of exposure. It looks like she's more interested in film work than television. Too bad. I'd like to see her take on another ongoing character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hate the thought of losing any Hubbards too but at the same time I'm done hoping for ABCD to do right by characters like Natalia and Frankie. Frons thinks the entire world cares only about his force-fed mess like Rylee and Zendall. Those of us who care about other characters are screwed and if they're characters of color we're screwed extra hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I like her and hope she is staying on the show indefinitely. Is it weird that she reminds me of Crystal Chappell / Olivia on GL? When Brot was trying to get Natalia to tell him what she wanted on that stakeout where they kissed a few weeks ago, and she was being mean to him and pushing him away, I was totally reminded. Character-wise, and even some of the facial features and expressions of the actresses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

*Suppressed laughter as not to wake up the sleeping* That's hilarious.

And NO! Hands off Ryape, I would be so upset if he took her V (is this what we're all still assuming?) and left her high and dry for Greenlee, you know, but "gallantly" and all. :rolleyes: Months ago some of us were talking about how we'd even allow that sacrifice if it meant more air time for her, but I can't say that I'm sorry she wasn't messed over by Ryan. That's a notch on his headboard he certainly does not deserve. However, SK works in some of the cutest, most hilarious looks and ad-libs and I would have paid a king's ransom to see her hook up with ol' Patchouli Jake and make a stink face.

See, I think SK and JRM have great chemistry, they're just handicapped by insultingly snail paced writing. Joey and Caitlin on Degrassi were more poppin' than these two, I mean, get with the program already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think they could have been good and interesting together. And something different. But TPTB/Frons seems to always really want Rylee, and that messes up any chance Ryan would have of being with someone he could have/does have good chemistry with.(Natalia, Madison, maybe JL's Liza and I also liked his chemistry with Dr. Sinclair.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

According to SOD Shannon is leaving AMC. They report that she has decided not to renew her contract and Natalia will be leaving PV on February 4.

http://soapoperadigest.com/news/breaking/

I will miss Shannon on AMC. I think that she is talented and pretty. I wish her the best.

I wonder how the writers will write Natalia out? And what will happen to Brot now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know Passions used this trope with Ethan and Sam to drag out the paternity, but GH seems to speed through certain stories while dragging others.
    • For any other soap, I think I’d agree, but GH, I don’t know

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Agreed, that there was some strange choices in the episode, especially at the end, but overall, that was some great drama that opens up the potential for so much future storyline. Kat vs. Eva having the most potential, especially over Tomas. I have mixed feelings about Martin/BC though. I thought he did pretty well in scenes with Smitty/MM, but the scenes of him confronting Leslie and of him throwing the books were bad lol she acted circles around him.  It’s similar to what Harding Lemay said about George Reinholt at AW; he could be brilliant in one scene, but then mediocre in the next. 
    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
    • I appreciate that you are using AI with the knowledge of it's limitations. Some posters take everything it produces as fact.
    • And of course Mama Ru herself appeared on All My Children.
    • The Saturday 8pm slot usually had the lowest rating of the NBC 4 sitcom lineup for some reason. NBC let Saturday night fizzle, They used 9.30 pm to launch 227 and Amen, both of which moved to earlier in the evening but they  kept Empty Nest following GG for several seasons.  Empty Nest should have moved to 8pm with their strongest new sitcom at 9.30, anticipating that GG would eventually falter. Instead they left them there and stretching the sitcom pool too thinly on other nights. When Grand talk over at 9.30 Thurs maybe Night Court and Wings could have been used on Saturday.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy