Jump to content

DAYS: Behind the Scenes, Articles/Photos


DRW50

Recommended Posts

  • Members

MTW and RC are the same age pretty much and there is about a decade between them and Wesley Eure.  He became a Dr in his time away, so I don't think we were supposed to think Mike was any younger.  I do think RC looked really young and hung out with people who weren't born yet when he was a grown man and that made him seem younger as well.  The only true de-aging I can think of is Sarah because she was born 40 years ago on screen.  I know kids SORASing is a joke on Days, but I don't think anyone except Sarah is younger than when they were actually born.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 7.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I'll put it another way: MTW and RC's Mikes were pretty much the same age that Wesley Eure's Mike was toward the end of his stint.  (I don't count Paul Coufos, lol.)

As far as SORASings so, Sarah's is certainly the strangest.  It either de-ages Maggie, or it makes it seem as if Sarah was a change-in-life baby.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Mike was SORASED  because of the Bill/Laura story and I guess they needed an older actor to play the angle of the son with mixed up parentage.

Couple that with the need for a next generation of family esp after Y&R put the focus heavily on the young 'uns.

Viewers at that time knew Mike and David were roughly the same age so they wouldn't have bought David being years younger than Mike.

Wes Eure and Richard Guthrie both were popular so TPTB probably were happy with the decision.

But long term it backfired.

My solution-age up Mike and David less drastically so maybe they would be 12 or so by the mid 70's. A competent actor could play the necessary beats in the Mike and David's stories.

In terms of young male characters my solution ,as I've stated before, would be to have Richard Guthrie as Julie's brother Steve, with Julie taking on a motherly role. Steve could be involved with Brooke, Valerie etc.

Wesley Eure could have been Maggie's brother that she raised, who is welcomed into the Horton clan. He can have the romance with Trish and Margo.

That leaves Mike and David ready to take over in the early/mid 80's as new male Horton leads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Nothing about Maggie's retconned history makes a lot of sense and didn't add anything to the character.  Yeah, I don't get that choice with Sarah.  It's not like they couldn't have found a more age appropriate actress.  An actress 10 years older than her wouldn't have changed the story that much.  PT is in his 40's. Kristen was in her 50's when the whole baby switch happened.  But again, I think this a situation where Sarah is supposed to be older than LG.

 

That all sounds really good.  To be fair back then of course I don't think writers/producers etc would imagine the show would still be on today and Mike's paternity went on for an insane amount of time for a soap.  The direction of Days changed so much in the 80's to be so youth focused that I don't think anyone considered how it would age Julie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The only thing they cared about for Julie in the early 1980s was how to get her off the show. Susan Hayes admits that she was difficult behind the scenes in those days. She should have looked at how unceremoniously Bill and Laura (Doug and Julie’s peers, age-wise) were written out just a few years earlier.

Edited by Chris 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It is hard to say, isn’t it?  Because Marlena had moved into the central heroine role with Roman.  And I loved how involved in their lives Tom and Alice were.  Would Doug and Julie have lead to less of Tom and Alice?  Or more likely, Mickey and Maggie?  I can’t imagine the show as it was then keeping both sets of characters, even if M&M were mostly on the backburner or in C stories at best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I guess Doug and Julie would have continued in the parental role. I think they were still on 3 days a week before they left  so they would go down to once a week to worry about Hope .

They were told that D&J would not have a story. Maybe they would throw in a few subplots like Julie getting a new job, or Doug having business problems etc.

Had they decided to stay maybe things would have imporoved down the track and David, Dougie or Steve might have come back to give the Williams more to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The only idea I had is Julie somehow gets entangled with Victor via Bo/Hope and maybe move that into possible romance since they did almost test that later on, but the Bo/Hope parental stuff would have dried up a few years later too when they left.  It so hard to guess.  A good writer could do it but the show was so Marlena/Brady/adventure/youth focus it's hard to imagine for me.  I see them mostly used in a capacity as Doug Place's owners where they were there when things happened and just peripherally involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But seriously.  I'm legit surprised that Billy Warlock and Julie Pinson are still together.  Whatever you might suspect about him, or his...proclivities, I never took BW to be the type to remain committed to anyone for more than five minutes.  But, I guess Peter Pan had to grow up sometime.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
    • Only thing I enjoyed was Abby / Olivia, etc., and the addiction storyline. Otherwise, I could do without the season.
    • Right? Vanessa had a ball gown for every occasion.
    • Roger's return storyline may have been silly but Roger's return was what lead to GL's last golden era.  It was the combination of Roger's return and Robert Calhoun becoming EP that got GL to finally hit it's stride after some really bad years. It will always disappoint me that the ratings during Robert Calhoun's run didn't reflect the quality of the show.
    • He also gave some of the best episodes, like the episodes surrounding Doug's death. The problem with Days was that Ron had a horrible vision from he top. I don't feel the same for MVJ and nothing that has happened in all these months suggests she doesn't have a handle on the show. Now if it becomes an issue I'll acknowledge it, but I'm not seeing it so far.
    • Jean Hackney was awful and that lead to Ben's exit story which sucked. I liked Ben/Val together. Val's love for Ben was that of a grown woman moving on with her life and Ben's love for Val made him willingly decide to raise another man's children as his own.
    • It wasn't just a GL thing, it was an 80s thing. Opulent party scenes on soaps were very big back then. Even in regular episodes where people are just going to dinner they're dressed up like they're going to see royalty.
    • Just started the May 27 episode and first thing I see is that Willow got an ugly haircut since hte last time i watched   I dont have the context for how everthing went down but I know its all Lulu's fault which make her a bish for what she did to Gio
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy