Jump to content

As The World Turns Discussion Thread


edgeofnik

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 17.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • DRW50

    2974

  • DramatistDreamer

    1958

  • Soapsuds

    1718

  • P.J.

    823

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members
Posted (edited)

There definitely is a notable difference for me in ATWT 1985 before and after Marland took over - the show was in a strong place (still not perfect by any means) - most of those he wrote out were not a big loss, but there was also a certain freshness, individuality and spunk which just never would have gone with his style.

You can see the biggest changes with characters like Nancy, Tom and Margo (and for some reason, Betsy and Kim seem to become less close), a heavier air he plasters with a bit of a rictus grin via campery and fantasy and hijinks (Meg, Shannon, and of course Lucinda at her most deliciously out of control). You still have some edges and outsiders too, but I never get the sense it's where his heart was and it is an odd fit for what surrounds the rest of the show (and indeed many of these elements become noticeably toned down after a year or so - beyond Meg and Shannon, see John going from a pariah to Lucinda's exasperated partner, Holden going from a dangerous stable boy to a perpetually sour business whiz, etc).

I don't really think Bedsow Horgan's ATWT could have been sustained, whereas, even with a few dips, I do think Marland managed to sustain his ATWT run (admittedly I'm one of those fans who genuinely connects with the increasingly darker strains of his final years), but there are moments of pre Marland '85 ATWT where I do wish we'd gotten more of that element carried over.

Thanks so much @Mona Kane Croft I wouldn't have even known a "new" ATWT episode was up if not for your post. We need what ATWT stood for and meant to us more than ever in today's world.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This totally encapsulates Marland's ATWT. The exec producer at the time was really responsible for pulling the Hughes family out of obscurity and making them the core the rest of the show spins around...(noticebly that wanes as the drab Snyders and their incestuous dramas unfold...) and the characters were still fun and distinct..Nancy is more of a hard ass and less the boring sweet grandma,  Lisa is eccentric and wild but now has money and social standing so gives no excuses...Bob is showing an impish sense of humor (which he looses totally under Marland) John is a major pain in the ass still flicking the noses of the Hughes and Stewart's (and totally in on Lucindas schemes) Margo is still headstrong and loving and she and Tom don't spend an episode talking about how honesty is the most important thing in a relationship. I really appreciate THIS ATWT over Marland, though as you said, he has the plotting and pace down.

I wonder if SBH could have moved over to GL, as her style was more...GLish. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That was a great episode and I don't think I'd ever seen it before. I didn't start watching ATWT until the Fall of 1985 and, for some reason, there is a real lack of 1985 episodes available on YouTube. This episode definitely had a back-to-the-basics feel and it's interesting that it was pre-Marland. All these years, I had wrongly credited Marland for bringing Chris and Nancy back. It's great to see Chris in that short gap in between his comeback and his physical and mental decline (which is evident just a matter of months after this episode). I would love to see more episodes from this time period. Especially Chris and Nancy's actual return. Based on dialogue, it must have happened not too long before this episode. 

So, I'm wondering if the return to the core of the show should be more credited to the producer at the time than Marland or Bedsow Horgan. 

Does anyone know who the woman in the red dress was talking to Frannie at the Hughes BBQ? I didn't recognize her and, unless I missed it, she didn't have any lines and wasn't referred to. It's kind of hard to see her as she's usually blocked by the other actors. She could have been an extra but it would be weird to just have one extra in that scene. 

I love this episode as well as it has my favorite Frannie (JM), my favorite Margo (HBS) and my favorite Betsy (LF). 

It's funny that Lucinda was so against Lily seeing Dusty since when Holden came into the picture, Lucinda was trying to push Lily and Dusty together. 

That song at the end was sooooo mid-80s. It reminded me of "We are the World". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Susan Horgan had been an ATWT producer with no official daytime writing experience when she took over. I believe I read that Calhoun was searching for a head writer for the entire year he employed her. I wonder if P&G was always planning to bring back Marland to the fold once his two year Loving contract was up. Calhoun allowed or caused a huge merry go round of writers during Horgan's year.  Her first co-head was Cynthia Benjamin who had no head writing experience; she lasted a few months, then was moved to outlines then fired. Then, Klein/Wasserman were co head with Horgan, then demoted back to outline writers. After the two week April 84 writers' strike, ATWT producers Michael Laibson and Bonnie Bogard were listed as co-heads for about two weeks (I think because they had been the strike writers). Then, Calhoun brought in Jack Sowards and Janet Stampfl as co heads (for weeks). In addition, Calhoun turned over a few story consultants including Robert Soderberg, George Lefferts and finally Harding Lemay (who was there at least from right after the 2 week strike ended through summer).  Not to mention that the show kept adding and subtracting script and outline writers.  Calhoun obviously had no confidence in Horgan and/or she was a placeholder until Marland was no longer under contract with Nixon. I thought Taggart/King's tenure was working well. Horgan's was messy but she had such a strong cast, huge budget and Calhoun knew how to produce. They paired Marland with Horgan when they brought her back as one of his outline writers (Dec 86 through May 87). I don't think it worked out well for her working with him.

Edited by VelekaCarruthers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know if you know but after the show ended, there were a number of divorces. Those people were really put through the wringer those last few years. He & "Emily" divorced.

Goutman & Marcia McCabe divorced.

ON GL Michael O'Leary & his high profile entertainment industry honcho wife, they divorced also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Bob, Nancy and Lisa's voices were very soothing..from childhood through high school, college, young adulthood and not so young adulthood! I remember when Hastings gave a 9/11 speech after the show, immediately a friend called me up and said, "Everything is going to be all right because Bob said so!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • A very good week for male eye candy on GH. New Michael is beautiful, Curtis's arms looked great in that polo shirt, Cody looks even more handsome with his new haircut AND we got Marco in swim shorts rocking his lovely bod and chest fur. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Yeah when Jamey Giddens did breakdowns for DAYS, he would sometimes state in tweets that specific things were his idea that he had pitched to Ron.
    • I don't, since they've clearly incorporated them into Tomas' storyline, and I happen to like his tattoos, but his jackets not fitting doesn't mean they're trying to cover his tattoos. The clothing overall isn't the issue; it's the fit. And I expect(ed) more from Jeresa Featherstone and her team. Very disappointed. He's the only male, overall, whose costume irritates me.
    • "And OMG, watching the scenes of Roger's return in comparison...the quality in the writing really nosedived. The stupid mask." Very much agreed.  Having Roger hide behind a mask for weeks/months, with it culminating with him swinging in on a vine at Blake/Phillip's wedding....geez.  So juvenile. IMO, Guiding Light never did a good job reintroducing major characters, either from the dead or elsewhere.  Masked balls = awful.  Amish = awful. When Reva was brought back from the dead, she should've just showed up in Springfield as Reva, and informed everyone that she had been gone for years because she felt like it.  She had a four-year fling with some dude who ended up dumping her due to disloyalty. Josh would be pissed and declare that their love is not *always* but *sometimes* and he'd act accordingly.  Her kids would hate her.   
    • Agreed. The Emmys next year are gonna be a pretty tough competition and I hope we get a Days sweep lol  Not only does Deidre deserve a nomination for these last few weeks, but I also think Paul Telfer, Raven Bowens, Carson Boatman, Dan Feuerriegel and Alison Sweeney have good chances as well.
    • It’s not about a lack of faith and trust in MVJ, it’s about a a lack of faith and trust in Ron Carlivati, who I think can be very sneaky and manipulative when he wants to be.  And, all that “He’s just a breakdown writer” talk never changed my mind about anything, because at Days, it was “just a breakdown writer” that gave us some of the worst episodes I’ve ever seen. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy