Jump to content

As The World Turns Discussion Thread


edgeofnik

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 17.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • DRW50

    2974

  • DramatistDreamer

    1958

  • Soapsuds

    1718

  • P.J.

    823

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Watching these January 1987 episodes and I notice once again that Shannon's story always sticks out like a sore thumb. It pretty much ALWAYS does throughout her run on the show. When she was integrated into the main cast more (when she dated Tom in 1988), it was mostly just stiff and awkward. Perhaps intentionally, I don't know.

I loved Shannon at the time, and I still enjoy most of this stuff looking back, but it's not hard to see why bringing her back was such a mistake.

And I'm so glad they recast this dull, pointless Emily.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agree, lol. As it was, explaining how Lisa would have had a child no one knew about, cementing his status on the show as Tom Hughes' younger brother -- it all turned out to be for naught, since Marland's death wound up scuttling whatever plans the show might have had for Scott beyond his introduction. (Plus, even if Marland hadn't died, I doubt Joseph Breen would have stayed on the show given his HIV status, and that still might have put a crimp in the plans.) OTOH, at least Chuckie was someone long-time viewers would have remembered, just as they had remembered the baby Kim thought had died that turned out to be the very-much-alive Sabrina.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hah, Vee, I hated David Jay, too! We would be up for a lot of the same roles and he landed a few. I must have seen him on Dark Shadows and thought he was bad. He was pretty creepy looking and not a particularly nice kid, either. His mother was not pleasant, either. I understudied him in a Lincoln Center production of Macbeth in 1974. I never got to go on for him but I did get to go on for the other actor I covered (Scott Thomson) after the poor guy had been mugged in Central Park. I went on for two performances, had a few scenes with Christopher Walken (he played Macbeth) and a week later we both ended up with measles! I strongly suspect I gave them to him-I was in junior high, after all, a hotbed of germs. I actually got them IN MY EYES-my doctor informed my parents that if they had veered 1/5th of an inch closer I would have been blinded. I heard later on that Macbeth closed early due to Walken getting measles. The famed Curse of Macbeth was no joke!

DRW50, I remember that Freddie Bartholomew was the executive producer of ATWT at the time and the only way I remember that is because he apparently met my mother and introduced himself as a former child actor- he had, in fact, been a child movie star in 1930s Hollywood classics like Litttle Lord Fauntleroy which she had loved when she was a kid! She was highly impressed, let me tell you. I remember auditioning for ATWT initially at Grey Advertising. Watching Mad Men now is a trip down memory lane because those real life ad men were always subtly and not-so-subtly trying to pick up my mom! She was very beautiful and looked like an actress. Interesting times.

Edited by TimWil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If they hadn't already done the whole stolen baby thing with Sabrina, it could have been revealed that Chuckie and another child were switched at birth ,either accidentally or part of some nefarious scheme.

Then the new character could go by his own name rather than have to deal with what to call the returned Chuckie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's one idea. But I wonder whether Marland was exploring the option of revealing that someone -- Dr. Michael Shea? -- had faked Chuckie's death when he was a child and then raised him under a different name away from Oakdale. Of course, if we do say Chuckie never died, then it just raises too many other questions that could never be answered satisfactorily.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OK, here's my brush with Douglas Marland-:

In 1991 I was in London and went to see the Brian Friel play Dancing At Lughnasa which had transferred to a West End theater from the Royal National Theater. It's a play about grown sisters and a lot of it took place in their family kitchen. During the intermission I saw Douglas Marland standing by himself having a drink. I walked over to him and told him how much I admired his work. His jaw dropped. I didn't tell him I was an actor, only that I recognized him from Soap Opera Weekly and I had a good memory. I remember mentioning how touching Alice Haining had been as Angel Lange when Angel revealed her history of sexual abuse on the witness stand. To be more specific it was the moment she concluded her testimony and was led out of the witness stand a shattered, exposed young victim. Marland thanked me, a tear forming in his eye. He then excused himself and returned with a British female theater companion and he said to her "This guy actually recognized me! Tell her!" And I did. We talked a bit about how good the play we were seeing was and I mentioned it reminded me a bit of the Snyder kitchen. Marland agreed, said he might steal something from the play for the show and shook my hand. It was a nice encounter.

In 1993 I found myself at his memorial service at the Ambassador Theater. My good friend Geraldine Court (who has also sadly passed away) brought me as her guest, along with Anna Stuart. It was wonderful. Tamara Tunie sang. Beautiful speeches from everybody. As we put on our coats I saw Sharon Case (who'd been playing Debbie) say to Martha Byrne and Jon Hensley "So do you guys wanna go bowling?" They just stared at her. Well, Case didn't know him as they knew him, didn't they?

Edited by TimWil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I freaking love that story, TimWil. But I'm also jealous, b/c one of my biggest regrets is that I'll never get the chance to meet my hero and thank him for his storytelling brilliance, much less have the opportunity to work for and be "tutored" by him.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Great stories TimWill! I think I've seen you post for years at Walford Web (an EastEnders site/forum that no longer exists, but there is a splinter forum for members who used to post there in existence now). Nice to see you posting here, through strange seeing you post about something other than EastEnders!

Edited by BetterForgotten
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks for the comments, guys.

Yes, BetterForgotten, I'm an EE devotee who wrote a lot of interviews for The Walford Gazette fan newspaper. I got to meet many of the show's cast, writers and production staff. In fact I'm pretty sure 1991 (the year I met Marland) may have been when I met my favorite interviewee of all time, Anita Dobson!

Khan, I was thrilled to meet Douglas Marland and it was wonderful to tell him what his work meant to us viewers. He really was so shocked that he'd been recognized since he wasn't an actor...and in London, of all places! I was glad I didn't tell him I was an actor because it would sound like I was kissing up for a job as a long-lost Snyder or something. Or maybe a resurrected Upchucky Shea! Damn, if I'd told him my screen test story that could have worked.

Vee, I told the Sharon Case storyline on Datalounge once. Is that where you could have seen it?

Here's another brush with ATWT (sorta):

I was a panelist for the Daytime Emmy Awards for about seven years. I most often found myself judging all the acting categories. I remember sitting near Helen Wagner several times at breakfast in the dining area. Most of us didn't bother looking well put together but she looked fantastic-perfect hair, make-up and wardrobe! Talk about classy. The respect she commanded by her colleagues was tremendous. One year I sat next to Lesli Kay Sterling on a panel for Outstanding Actor in a Children's Series. She was absolutely delightful. I had to try to keep that from influencing my judging the following year-she did end up winning anyway, right?

I also jjudged the year when Margo had been raped. I wanted Ellen Dolan to win the award very badly. However I could only in good conscience vote strictly on what was seen on her submitted tape and what was on that tape was only Margo being catatonic in the immediate aftermath. I was crushed. A few other times I wanted to vote for Elizabeth Hubbard but I just couldn't because her acting taken out of context looked extremely messy, unfocused, like she was floundering with the words. I think the writing (even Marland's) should certainly have played a part in that. Erika Slezak's tapes, on the other hand, were always easy to follow and her acting was...clean. Smooth. Sharp as a tack. And so she got my vote several times. And OK, Susan Lucci did deserve the Emmy she finally got. I could swear she submitted bad tapes on purpose for a few years there, though, because she (or her husband?) was more interested in cashing in on her notoriety for being a "loser"-remember that Equal commercial?

Someday soon I'll tell you of my nasty "brush" with Chris Goutman!

Edited by TimWil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Well, they usually weren't on the show at the time for long until the late 90's. But yeah, they really deserved a story centered on them, and not through the lens of Reva.
    • Chelsea was doing the absolute most today! Why was she introducing her sister to a woman she doesnt know? That whole scene was embarrassing. Madison needs to stay away from her bc she is too immature
    • Gosh, what a waste with Lunacy. Why have her live with $B, reveal Finn, pardon her, etc What makes this story incredibly hollow is that what Luna is asking isn't unreasonable - to spend time with her cousin father. She's not asking to move in with them. How hard with it be for Finn to throw her a bone by, say, I'll meet you for lunch/coffee once at week at the hospital cafeteria. Lunacy isn't going to hurt Finn. In fact, all her crimes were related to finding her father and it turns out to be someone she's loved her entire life. Instead of course-correcting the nonsense of last summer, Brad somehow found a way to make this worse! That's a skill... Of all the younger actors B&B has cast during the past 5 years, LY has shown the most growth and range. Why get rid of her? 
    • On the subject of sets (seems more interesting to discuss than the actual show)  Some sets we don't see anymore Lauren/Michael apartment (haven't seen that in years) Victoria's house (are Marian/Tessa living there?) Apartment above Crimson Lights (I think Chelsea was the last resident) Penthouse (Lily's home) Chancellor Estate (Devon/Abby) Chancellor office (once Dark Horse) Nick's house GCAC room (used as residence/hotel room for several characters) Some of these may pop up again. The tack house,for example, was not seen for many months before being used again. Have I missed anything?
    • Thanks for searching through everything. Worked on them so long, just too lazy to check for those links myself, so I am glad you chose to do it! I guess I never did type out anything for 1973-1977 in regards to the preemptions, but they are on the charts at least (and this far back, they don't seem to do any of those "breakouts" anymore, so things are simpler in the 1970's, so eventually I could type those out). 
    • I dump on the Y&R sets problem all the time, but BOLD is no better -- and they're not even introducing new sets. All of their sets are years old, and very few look like they're inhabited by people with money. Is that going to change with this move? I'd rather they save the money spent on another remote, which is no better than an HGTV travelogue, and get some new/better sets.
    • The donut posts here make up for a Friday show that was barely meh. Aside from seeing Anna, I really didn't care much about anything else. While I understand the thought behind breaking up all the sadness with "other scenes," I'd rather they moved right to John's funeral. Instead of hearing a stupid story about John changing some minor character's tire 20 years ago, just move on to the crying. I also thought the Chad and Cat scenes were a waste. I realize not everyone is devastated by John's death to the point of not functioning, but going sky diving is a choice. By the way, Jack and Jennifer are giving me nothing on this return. Please leave asap. DAYS did such a great job with John's death, so ending the week this way was a letdown.
    • Add Dr. Montgomery to list of fine women on this show! I hope the show goes forward with Madison/Chelsea and then once they're developed, bring back Allison, who is now divorced or a widow, for a Madison/Chelsea/Allison triangle.  It would definitely be the hottest triangle in daytime.  
    • I wonder if Linda Bloodworth-Thomason had Kim in mind for any of her other characters/series. If they intended Allison Sugarbaker (Julia Duffy's character) to be more in line with who Suzanne was/Delta Burke's portrayal-persona, then I think Kim would have aced that. Yes, it would have been odd, Kim having previously played a different character (from a different family), but Designing Women wouldn't have been the first show with that issue. Or maybe Kim could have played Beth Broderick's role on Hearts Afire. Or Patricia Heaton's role on Women of the House.
    • Sony is probably waiting until Y&R’s lease is up as well. All of TV City is going to be gutted, so they have to relocate at some point. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy