Jump to content

Y&R: Week of Sept 20, 2010


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think the audience will more likely accept the woman sleeps with rival's son storyline with Phyllis than they would have Sharon. It looks like the kind of thing Phyllis would do and the writers can pretend that it's the 90's when it comes to Phyllis sex appeal.

NuNoah reminds me of teenage J.T. with Daniel hair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, but Sharon was never a parental figure to Daniel. They may go there with Phylis/Noah, but I think it's totally skeevy, since I remember her playing games with a 10 year old Noah. That's approaching Bridget/Ridge levels of pseudo incest.

As far as MS sex appeal, I'm pretty sure most of the male population wouldn't be in any hurry to kick her out of bed. I think she's aging pretty well. Actually, I think that's true for most of the GC women in their late 30's/ 40's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I could believe Sharon/Daniel more than Phyllis/Noah. Phyllis has not really ever slept around. She usually just wants one person and if she is with someone else it's out of loneliness or whatever. Sharon was written as needing to have sex with a lot of men to make up for her mental illness. Given Daniel's porn addiction and his relationship with a porn star, he must have also had issues with sexuality. What if he and Sharon started sleeping together when they were at low points and then slowly fell for each other?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wouldn't mind Sharon/Daniel. Maybe down the road Daniel could pick up the pieces when Adam screws Sharon over. Right now, I believe Sharon/Adam is going to happen at some point soon.

It's true Phyllis tends to get obsessed with one person, but historically she does sleep around out of revenge and as part of her plots. I don't really mind that these women sleep around. Jack and Billy get to have random sex without seeming pathetic. Phyllis and Sharon should get the same treatment. Instead they have to be portrayed as mentally ill or doing it up against a dumpster. Sometimes I feel like Mad Men era writers are in charge of soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Right. Literally for decades, soaps mesmerized their audiences with tales of romance, family conflict, class struggles, and recognizable interpersonal-relationship sagas. We didn't need relentless, heavy violence. We didn't need clones, mad scientists, extra-terrestrials and demon possessions. We didn't need gaggles of plastic himbos and bimbos pushing beloved vets off-screen. We only needed to see people whom we cared about, and the intelligent, moving progression of their lives. Flashy sets, gaudy gimmicks, and high-falutin' hairdos be damned. The characters and the words were important.
    • Absolutely! Brad should've simply moved on from Lunacy. There's no point of freeing her, if you're not going to at least make an attempt at redemption or incorporating her into the fold. It happened with Quinn, who committed quite a few felonies before become the Forrester Matriarch.  Heck, keep Lunacy in prison and have Poppy/Finn discover that she gave birth to twins - 'Sunny' could've come on with a clean slate and still had Sheila/Finn and all the other drama. It certainly couldn't have been worse than what we've witnessed with the destruction of $B.    
    • I would enjoy it if Swan popped up on BTG as an old one time friend/mentor of Anita’s for a cameo. This is just

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I had totally forgotten that Courtney story. I see Burton was already phoning it in by that point.
    • omg I completely missed that, but now when I see it typed here in your post, it's obvious icky cringe. So now I just checked and Tomas said that -- on May 27 that he likes the author Carl Ivati.  He said it with sort of an accent, so I didn't catch the stupid joke or think about the spelling.   I remember when that aired, that I actually said to myself at the time, "I wonder if that's a Latin American author, and I will have to google him later." And now I see your post, and I see. Well that's cringe, and I feel stupid to have fallen for it.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • There's a lot you don't need if you have the writing.  You don't even need large casts!  You could make do with a cast of 12-18 actors if the writing is there.
    • Thank you. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with sleeping around if your spouse actually knows about it. She’s just a cheating slut.
    • OMG...Robert Mandan! And Donna Mills is a child. I keep hoping for more of early Ross/Vanessa.
    • I get your point, but I also know that if the roles were reversed -- if a man were screwing around on a woman this way -- everyone would be all "All with his head!" When I say Vanessa needs therapy, I'm actually being kind, because I could begin and end with the fact that she's a cheating slut.
    • Is nobody going to mention the cringefest that is 'Carl Ivati'?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy