Jump to content

Dallas 2.0: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

His teeth are either veneered or just bleached, they may naturally be that Chiclety. It's probably just the angle, but doesn't it look like somebody took their thumb and forefinger and cinched his nose a bit?

I think he should have played Jordana's character's ambitious brother and been sort of a Cliff Barnes-ish character that way.

<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/sflash.cab#version=9,0,0,0" width="480" height="316" id="embed" align="middle" >

<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"/>

<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"/>

<param name="movie" value="http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/player/embed.swf"/>'>http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/player/embed.swf"/>

<param name="flashVars" value="mediaKey=1409053450&image=http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/2008-02/08/020808_{1409053450}_1409053450_still.jpg&origin=embed"/>'>http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/2008-02/08/020808_{1409053450}_1409053450_still.jpg&origin=embed"/>

<param name="quality" value="high"/>

Jesse, you took the words right outta our mouths. <_<

<param name="bgcolor" value="#ffffff"/>

<embed src="http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/player/embed.swf" flashVars="mediaKey=1409053450&image=http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/2008-02/08/020808_{1409053450}_1409053450_still.jpg&origin=embed" width="480" height="316" name="embed" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="always" allowFullScreen="true" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer"></embed>

</object>

Jesse, you took the words right outta our mouths. <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Members

Seriously why not get Omri Katz and the original Christopher to play the roles again. This new Dallas is going to flop if they dont recast the roles before the first episode.....if they get the green light.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

I wonder if those revisions are getting it even further away from the origins of Dallas. I know the original script included Pamela Rebecca and also Cliff who explained the Barnes/Ewing fued to Christopher and his daughter. They rewrote it so Rebecca was a new character. That revision also removed the Barnes from the story and re-wrote history (not sure how exactly) to minimize the role the Barnes (and the fued) played on the original series. Also they wrote a backstory for Elena which meant she would've been living at Southfork when the original series aired.

Obviously thats me "nit picking" as a fan, but I do wonder if they'll go back and make it closer to the roots. Chances are it'll stray even further. This isn't looking too good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I see less and less reason why this needs to be remade. What you have amounts to a total revamp by mediocre/poor producers, with a handful of original actors doing glorified cameos, and the new cast being so incredibly bad and forgettable that they would probably make the Melrose Place revamp look like the RSC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I honestly think Falcon Crest in the hands of a brilliant nutcase would be the show to be remake. Or Knots Landing only because it's premise is so easy to adapt. But Falcon Crest would be the perfect show to remake since it never really lived up to it's potential and it's premise is something that would fit on modern tv. I would do a combination of the more gothic early seasons and that hard edge of the final season.

Dallas was too epic it seems. You don't see them giving MASH a sequel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Dallas was also very played out. They ran out of material years before the show went off the air. It relied on exhausted characters.

The only reason the show is coming back is nostalgia, and they can't even do that right.

Knots Landing would have been the show I would have chosen to revive, especially since a blend of melodrama and economic hard times might have appealed to an audience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it would be really interesting to recreate the ultra middle class early years of Knots for cable. Because the show reinvented itself so successfully so many times, I know opinions are mixed on those early years but I found them to be such exciting years. Right now I purchased the entire series which I'll finally be re-watching after five years and I'm going to start from the beginning even though the first 3 years I've watched in recent years.

I'd love to see a modern take on Richard, Laura and Abby in particular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

THey'd never remake Falcon Crest or Knots Landing because those names are nowhere big enough or "exciting" enough to deflect attention from the actual show itself. They'd actually have to...idk...write stuff? And then early KL might be too boring for today TV's industry...to make things "more interesting" (because when they remake, they always have to talk about how much the original sucks), you might get drug-lord Laura, hooker Ginger, wife-beater Gary, and Sid collecting inappropriate pictures of his daughter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • And I'm here for it.   Also...YES, PLEASE. 
    • Also, someone knocked over the head (usually in the D Mansion) and imprisoned in the secret tunnel room or whatever it was. I swear that must have happened at least a dozen times the last few years, and each time it drove me crazy! 
    • HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! And here I am rewatching and...

      Please register in order to view this content

    • 5-9   Honestly? There's nothing going on. And yet unlike Y&R, I'm not bored. But I just think that's because of the acting going on as they play the beats in this Liam dying storyline. Well, that and the outfits.   If there's anything I'm liking it's the continued drama of Daphne going after Carter and not letting anyone get in her way. Not Brooke. Not Katie. NO ONE.    And while I love TK in those glasses, I am not here for a Brooke/Ridge/Taylee triangle.    And of course, Luna would try to use this Liam mess to get closer to Finn.   Okay week.
    • The acting during those Sarah scenes on Friday was horrific.
    • So true. Their hypocrisy is on another level. When Anita called Ted a coward because he used Bill as a fixer, I almost choked on my Ritz. And Dani calling Ted worse than Bill as a husband because Bill never pretended to be a good person? Then why stay with him for decades and continue to kiss up to him, Dani? I was glad when Bill told Anita he wouldn't be her punching bag. Not for me. I can think of 100 other actors who would have smoking hot chemistry with LB. Lindstrom does not. I see zero chemistry. None. Joey isn't sexy or scary.   -- Mona was awesome today. -- Why was Eva playing cards in the back room of the casino? -- Can they make Anita any more sanctimonious and self-righteous? -- Dani said Anita had Ted shook. LOL. Really?       No. But I see what you're trying to do. This is a SOAP OPERA. Characters HAVE to make mistakes and sin and screw up and cheat. That's the deal. I understand the concern that we have 2 leading Black men who have cheated on their wives. I do. But I also understand that this is SOAPS 101. Are we going to hear complaints every time a Black character messes up???    
    • Gone are the days where at least once every week, a character would pull a gun on someone (Ron you really turned gun violence into a joke on this show)
    • Oooooo I like these. I like we are on the same page about Little Brownie Man. And I hope to remember this at the end of June to see how much of it came to pass. I definitely feel that the Eva vs Kat story is about to reaaaally get going.    As for the B/C stories, it's funny you mentioned the Joey/Vanessa/Doug story first. Because out of all of those, it is the only one that has enough structure and build to it that it could keep going as a B story that could eventually climax. I think the only POV we don't have in it is Joey's at this point because Month 2 put in the work to give us Doug's and Vanessa's and they are now circling each other and their relationship. And we still need to know Joey's endgame.   Why we gotta pick on Jacob and Naomi? We need that goody good couple. lol. They talked about how they got together. Mind you, very briefly. But we do need to know a little bit more about both. Something I was hoping we were getting by having them in their own stories....him with the crooked cop, her with the lawsuit...but it didn't turn out as hoped. Hopefully, that won't be the case with June though.   Yeah, I want to see more of THAT Ashley.  I finally had to break down and explain to my manager why I keep laughing every time I see the bottle of Febreze at work. The product placement definitely be working.
    • I’m one of those people

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy