Jump to content

Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman Discussion thread


alphanguy74

Recommended Posts

  • Members

The freshness of the show wore off after a while, then the whole Louise being arrested thing happened and she was off he show shortly after. I watched until Louise left, never watched Fernwood. I never thought the show too sexualised, although I may be looking back on it with a modern sensibility, I never remember being shocked or disgusted by anything. I was 19 when the show aired, so it may have something to do with it. I did get a little bored by the show as many things stayed the same, I would say the first six to eight months were the best, the rest was good but not as good. I don't remember anything specifically but just remember not watching it every night as I did when it first started.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...
  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 months later...
  • 1 year later...
  • Members

It was not so much that the freshness wore off, but that Norman Lear made a gravely strategic error in forcing out headwriter Ann Marcus. Although Gail Parent developed the concept, it was Ann Marcus who layered the characterizations and created something so much deeper than just a zany parody of soaps. After Marcus left, the series really lost its focus as subsequent writers Tom Eyen and Dennis Klein wrote MH2 as a one-note joke. They did not understand the series, or if they did, they chose to ignore what made it successful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No, I did not. I saw it, of course, but was not a viewer. To my knowledge, Alan Thicke was the head writer of Fernwood 2-Nite. He had nothing to do with the writing of MH2. I do not know what happened to Dennis Klein. Tom Eyen was the initial replacement for Ann Marcus. Eyen was the writer for whom Lear had a hard on. Later on, he achieved a great deal of success with Dreamgirls, but I feel his approach to Mary Hartman was wrong. He was more the Ron Carlivati of his day. Just my opinion. Sorry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Fernwood 2-Nite was actually a summer replacement series. MH2 was produced in thirteen week cycles. After the first two cycles of 130 episodes in 1976, there was a break. The 130 episodes were re-edited, and during the summer of 1976, reruns of Mary Hartman were shown until the next cycle began in October. Mary Hartman ended in July 1977, and Fernwood 2-Nite was produced as a filler until Forever Fernwood would be ready for syndication in October 1977. After Forever Fernwood was cancelled at the end of its first two cycles, in March 1978, Fernwood 2-Nite was brought back again to fill the remainder of the slot until July, though it had been renamed America 2-Nite and no longer originated from Fernwood (apparently due to the end of the Mary Hartman franchise).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • That was my point really. These anniversary party scenes are the first ones, and now they won't be able to use them (meaning these actual scenes, as aired, with OG Ted). They can recreate them but I doubt they will spring for all the extras to come back and film and recreate everything, so it will be more like tight closed in shots of Ted with one or two other actors, or snippets of Leslie's original speech where Ted wasn't visible. It would be hard to recapture the original energy of the scenes are as they were filmed in their full context. I just think that's too bad, but maybe they will prove me wrong. I never really saw what was so off in his portrayal to warrant a recast, anyway, so that colors my perception as well.
    • Yeah, and quite honestly, are there really that many scenes that are flashback-worthy at this point in the run?
    • I know at one point they were on Hulu & i-Tunes. I just checked it on JustWatch.com & it indicates 1 season on Prime Video & on AppleTV. Have fun!
    • That era is so weird...they made a big deal out of all three of those characters and then they just..disappeared! Not that I am complaining. We talk about the bad out of character writing for Alex under JFP..but this was one example that may have led them to write her being so obsessive with Nick.  WHY would Alex accept Flock of Seagulls guy as her brother? They had her in one scene (setting up the Alan return) complain that Alan abandoned her...she blackmailed him into leaving town and she had been angry at him for helping Brandon with Lujack and also using Spaulding for that dumb dreaming death thing. Endless scenes of her with Simon, I can't believe Bev wasn't bored to death! I would also add Pam writing the scene where she lets Ms. Sally die in front of her to protect Alan and  the writing for Alex could be screwy even before JFP.
    • On this day 34 years ago the final episode of Dallas and came in at an astonishing #2 in the ratings after two straight seasons of weak ratings. Interesting Knots was #27 for that week as well:  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Thank you for clearing that up. I wasn't watching GL regularly yet at that point, but seems to me I should have remembered the big wedding after Leslie's death (which I do remember) described in the profile. Is there a web archive of SOD summaries, or are referring to your own personal collection?
    • I was bummed that 2.0 ended because Mcpherson (headwriter) had really set up some interesting stories and we never got to find out where the stories would go once they resumed production on 'season 2'. I remembered the EP (Ginger Smith) and a lot of the stars gave a lot of credit to McPherson being able to come in on very short notice and come up with stories/plots (I think it was a very short turnaround time of a few weeks).  It was nice that she got to redeem herself after her year long Days stint was not well reviewed/liked.
    • Enters                                 Speaks

      Please register in order to view this content

           
    • It seems like a setup for failure to review a single episode of a soap, but Cleveland Amory was a foolish man.  His taste was so predictable, that one wondered why bother reviewing a medium he so clearly disliked. (found on Facebook retro TV group) Another case in point of his misogyny from his review of Dark Shadows (Can you imagine the magazine with the widest circulation in the country insulting its customer in this way today?)

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • They could easily be re-created, or even re-shot in different ways, especially if they were re-shooting scenes at some point, as well.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy