Jump to content

Y&R: Michael Muhney tried to save a man


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Michael Muhney (Adam) tweeted a little while ago that when he was on the beach this morning, he saw a man down in the water. Said he pulled the man to safety and performed CPR and kept him breathing for 15 minutes until the paramedics got there. Unfortunately, despite all of his efforts, the man died. MM said the man's name was Mike and he had a wife and daughters. He also said he (MM) was shaken up by the incident, and is praying for the man's family. He has asked that we pray for the man's family as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Oh wow, that is terrible. :( I read the title of this thread three times before I opened it, I wasn't sure if you were saying that MM had passed. How traumatic for all involved. Thoughts and prayers with Mike's family, and MM, a moment in his life he will surely never forget.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It is the culture we live in today. Experiences aren't real or meaningful unless people share them on the news, twitter, a blog, etc. I'm always amazed at people's need to share their most painful and intimate experiences with the public.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
I don't want to sound like a hypocrite, because I'm a part of the Twitterverse. But I don't use the Twitterverse to be a pathetic faux-celebrity. I use it to share interesting stories, quotes, quips, and lighthearted stories with people.

Per usual from Muhney, it just kind of seemed like a pathetic attempt at getting attention. It makes you wonder whether he tried to save the man from drowning because he was truly trying to save someone's life or whether he did it for good publicity. I think it was a combination of both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Granted, I think MM takes the "open book" approach a bit too literally. This time, however, I'm willing to give him the good-old benefit of the doubt. A man he tried to save from drowning died, and he wants to share the news in the hopes that everyone who follows his tweets will send prayers, condolences and good thoughts to his loved ones. I believe that's a nice, humane gesture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I feel for the man, but this should be about him and his family's loss, not some soap opera actor's heroic act. If this was isolated that is one thing, but MM was twittering about his grandfather being rushed to the hospital by ambulance and dealing with some health scare with his family. Do these people know MM is sharing this kind of information? When my family is going through some emergency, my first thought is not to go on twitter to share my family issues. It just seems strange to me, and a weird way to garner attention. Maybe the actor is this open about his life, but sometimes I also feel a lack of genuine feeling with his actions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

WTH MM Tried To save A Man Who Ended Up Dying & All We Can Talk About Is That MM is an Attention seeking whore

Nice Folks, Real Nice

Someone just lost their son, Husband, friend & father

Whats more important here and yes Im ashamed to have to ask that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • BTG: A-  DAYS: B+  Eastenders: C
    • There was a rumor that Jean will die and that’s probably why she’s back then
    • There has been some confusion about Michael & facial burns. Please see this post: https://bsky.app/profile/shallotpeel.bsky.social/post/3lqkrryu54226 I've chosen to put this here instead of the Classic Thread because it is now with the appearance of recast Michael that this has come up. Different places online, including at least one podcast, remarks have been made about how remarkable it is that he is without facial scarring. Other fans say it was clear from the first that he did not have facial burns. What is included in this post is 2 screengrabs where you can see his face at the hospital & a very quick edit of that day in the hospital. 
    • Put me in the LOVE KMH camp. As a poster alluded to above, her detractors seem to come from people who first experienced the 80s Emily actress. And that's often the case with soaps, myself included. I enjoy the original actor so much that I just never take to the recast. However, KMH played Emily far longer than the original - for almost 20 years - and when she had great material, she was great. I get the sense she didn't like playing the whiny oh-woe-is-me Emily which was all the material she got from about 1996 until she took over the Intruder in late '99/early '00 and got to play a stronger kiss-ass woman who didn't care what anyone thought of her. (Some would call that a bitch but, if a man was in that role, he'd just be called a smart and savvy businessman.) Her relationship with Hal was great. The transformation was done realistically and I thoroughly enjoyed those years the best out of all. Once the writers decided to break up those two, they went back to writing Emily half the time as whiny and pathetic. I preferred when the writers made her stronger.
    • Hahaha - I do. I've always been the type, though, that can't miss anything. I get FOMO, so I'll not skip episodes or fast forward anything. There are only a few TV shows I've dropped because they got so bad vs. sticking it out to the end.  The promise that GL 1997 is better is what keeps me going. I especially want to see the fallout of Blake's lie about her twins and then Annie's descent which I believe won Watros's Emmy.
    • Rita's rape is an episode i constantly search on YouTube hoping one day that it will show up. I always feel like I may have seen it, but I was only 6 at the time and can never figure any of the things I have vague recollection of 
    • FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM FEBRUARY 1973 & MAY 1973:

      Please register in order to view this content

        FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM AUGUST 1973 & NOVEMBER 1973:
    • The rape was in 1979 after they were married. Blake was the result of Holly cheating with him while she was married to Ed. I believe she was born in 1975. 
    • No. Ed and Holly were married and having problems. She had an affair with Roger and that's when Christina--Blake--was conceived. The rape happened much later, after Holly and Roger were married.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy