Jump to content

Bravo's The Real Housewives of....


Cheap21

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Cheap21

    5000

  • Taoboi

    4063

  • Cat

    4032

  • NothinButAttitude

    3991

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Rightly so. She has it coming. I have been waiting on all day to get through my work day to visit this thread and see all the brilliant responses here.

Sure have. Robyn is a fraud and is not playing the game of reality TV. 

Spot on analysis on your part and on the part of Candiace. 

I wholeheartedly agree that I stand with Candiace. 

Robyn is monetizing this affair outside of the RH universe and that is a mortal sin.

Robyn should be fired for this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She's a fraud who exposed herself. That's the crazy thing. Egged on by her equally-foolish BFF on their (free) podcast. And she took a page from the Jen Shah Playbook (because that worked so well for Jen Shah) with "Subscribe to my Patreon to hear more gory details of Juan's philandering da troof!" She really thought she flexed.

Gina Liano Gina Rhomelbourne GIF - Gina Liano Gina Rhomelbourne Real  Housewives Of Melbourne - Discover & Share GIFs

A couple of things:

1. This could all have been done with Bravo's knowledge and blessing. The only way Bravo would give its blessing is if this came out on the show first. So it is always possible that Robyn spilled the beans at reunion. However, there are no rumors that this actually happened (and you know production loves to leak ahead of a reunion). The rumors we got is that it was everybody vs Karen in an effort to get Karen off the show and Charrisse on. 

Please register in order to view this content

 (WHY these women are still caping for Bump on a Log is beyond me).

Moreover, the absolute shock expressed yesterday by Karen, Candiace, Chris Bassett-Hound, Wendy and Carlos King (who would have insider intel) says to me that they were blindsided. (Gizelle/Ashley/Mia have been ominously quiet).

2. Robyn thought this would guarantee her a S8 spot, a plan co-signed by her BFF. 

3. Yet another deflection tactic by the two liars: throw out tawdry details of an affair in order to distract from the legal case in which Juan has been implicated.

4. Juan no longer wants in on the show. He married Robyn (did Bravo even get to televise it?) so that she won't testify at any upcoming legal proceedings. He cannot risk anymore salacious stuff coming out, and he & Robyn have agreed that S7 will be their last. Consequently, Ms. Work-shy is trying to establish a money-spinning, post-RHOP career on Patreon.

Edited by Cat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Right. Sunday's episode elicited 1, maybe 2 posts here? Robyn's social media dumpster fire has elicited 2 pages.

Plus, her announcement exposes the contrivance around which this season (and past ones) have been based. Lies and fake stories thrown at the wall in order to deflect from embarrassing revelations. Robyn exposed her husband. Viewers have now concluded that she's been lying about her own situation for a number of seasons. The jig is up.

This is not good for RHOP in terms of carrying on as per usual in S8.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I believe it too. She is so effing stupid. Bravo had been waiting years for Robyn & Juan to sh!t or get off the pot. Well, they did both in one go, and now it's a mess. 

Just to recap (and as Chris Bassett tweeted yesterday): It has been a full season of lies perpetrated by her and her buddy. And now she's told the audience that if they want 'the truth,' that is going to be monetised behind a paywall. A non-Bravo paywall. Yeah, I bet Bravo is pissed. Viewers are pissed, too, because we expect 'the truth' to show up on the main, and only, platform -- RHOP. Not on Robyn's budget Patreon account. 

Edited by Cat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Speculation about Missy Reeves' potential evolution on basic civil rights doesn’t change my opinion of her. My view is shaped entirely by her public social media presence—which I find unpalatable—and I have no interest in learning more beyond that. I simply liked Jennifer’s hair and dress. That’s as far as my admiration goes.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy