Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soap Opera Network Community

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Y&R Episodes Discussion

Featured Replies

  • Member

LAME = Rushed reunion.

Thier whole love affair was rushed Lily didn't even wait until the ink on her divorce paper was dry before she started to get with Cane. So what did you except from Lame rushed reunion.

  • Replies 259
  • Views 50.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Member

Thad Luckinbill has grown so much.

In so many ways. :P

I just hope JT is going to stay around and remain reasonably in character. He's been one of the better parts of the show for me these past few months, and is one of the few younger men on the show who isn't an asswipe.

  • Member

In so many ways. :P

Nip/Tuck proved that. :lol: :lol: :lol:

I just hope JT is going to stay around and remain reasonably in character. He's been one of the better parts of the show for me these past few months, and is one of the few younger men on the show who isn't an asswipe.

Decent guys don't exist in Genoa City unless their 70+ & wear plaid.

  • Member

The thing is JT KNOWS how The Newmans are especially about family.

If he wants any sort of relationship with Reed that doesn't involve The Newmans making every decision for him he better get it legally dealt with now instead of trusting their goodwill.

That would be the smart thing to do and the writers can't have him doing the smart thing when he's going up against the Newmans.

  • Member

The problem is the Newmans are untouchable. If JT did this while Victor and Nikki were away, we'd have Victor return telling us what a lowlife and a punk JT was for not fighting for custody while Victor was in town. Then he'd just get a judge to do what he wants.

There would be no sweeter revenge story than to see JT fight for custody of Reed and the court sides with him, and the Newmans have to go along.

If only this show gave a sh!t about the Newmans being anything other than gods.

  • Member

That would be the smart thing to do and the writers can't have him doing the smart thing when he's going up against the Newmans.

Touche!

  • Member

The problem is the Newmans are untouchable. If JT did this while Victor and Nikki were away, we'd have Victor return telling us what a lowlife and a punk JT was for not fighting for custody while Victor was in town. Then he'd just get a judge to do what he wants.

If only this show gave a sh!t about the Newmans being anything other than gods.

Since Hogan bitches about how there needs to be 'men with balls', why can't he have the balls to tell Eric Braden that even "The Great" Victor Newman needs to pay for his crimes and misdeeds.

  • Member

Since Hogan bitches about how there needs to be 'men with balls', why can't he have the balls to tell Eric Braden that even "The Great" Victor Newman needs to pay for his crimes and misdeeds.

To Hogan, the only way you can be a "man with balls" is if you treat everyone like garbage and destroy everything you touch.

  • Member

Sony's Y&R site has pictures of what happens to Sharon in the 12/24 episode and will lead to a major story in 2010:

possessionlevitation3.jpg

5fa437b3bd28f4fcb238d8e57ca91a3e.jpg

JUST KIDDING! But you know that this could easily happen given with the current Adam/Sharon nonsense...

Edited by soapfan770

  • Member

Anyone else find in strange that nobody in Genoa City believes in the First Amendment? Not a single person has told Billy that he was doing the right thing; they're all lining up to tell him how wrong he was to protect his source.

  • Member

Anyone else find in strange that nobody in Genoa City believes in the First Amendment? Not a single person has told Billy that he was doing the right thing; they're all lining up to tell him how wrong he was to protect his source.

These are the same people who acted like he was the worst person ever for taking on Grambo. :lol:

  • Member

And where is Mark to defend Adam purposely knocking down and ruining Cassie's drawing?

I don't think he purposely broke it, he's supposed to be mostly blind so his coat aim was probably off. They just cut to that picture to add a little credence to Nicky boy's suspicion. If he really wanted to ruin it he would have taken his bloody hand and smeared it all over. It was just a broken glass in a picture frame, which can be replaced for 3 dollars or less. What would be the point of Adam purposely ruining it when he could have boinked Sharon right there on his embroidered Xmas stocking? Not that Adam's or anyone's actions require having sense.

I wish we'd see GC gathering at Victor's toilet like they did at the dump since the writers act like the sun literally shines out of his ass. At least under Bill Bell, Victor might have always won the war, but he'd lose battles along the way.

Edited by BadZoe

  • Member

I don't think he purposely broke it, he's supposed to be mostly blind so his coat aim was probably off.

:lol::lol::lol:

They've handled Adam's blindness so poorly, I don't even know how he manages to get around town with his vision, which they never acknowledge half of the time.

They just cut to that picture to add a little credence to Nicky boy's suspicion. If he really wanted to ruin it he would have taken his bloody hand and smeared it all over. It was just a broken glass in a picture frame, which can be replaced for 3 dollars or less. What would be the point of Adam purposely ruining it when he could have boinked Sharon right there on his embroidered Xmas stocking? Not that Adam's or anyone's actions require having sense.

Wasn't it inferred Sharon threw the paining away at the end when she talked about how she needed to embrace change and move on from it? Though, I hope she kept it.

I wish we'd see GC gathering at Victor's toilet like they did at the dump since the writers act like the sun literally shines out of his ass. At least under Bill Bell, Victor might have always won the war, but he'd lose battles along the way.

:lol:

Too true!

Edited by Y&RWorldTurner

  • Member

I don't think he purposely broke it, he's supposed to be mostly blind so his coat aim was probably off. They just cut to that picture to add a little credence to Nicky boy's suspicion. What would be the point of Adam purposely ruining it when he could have boinked Sharon right there on his embroidered Xmas stocking? Not that Adam's or anyone's actions require having sense.

I wish we'd see GC gathering at Victor's toilet like they did at the dump since the writers act like the sun literally shines out of his ass. At least under Bill Bell, Victor might have always won the war, but he'd lose battles along the way.

They are purposely leaving this and some other thngs "Adam" does, that affect Sharon, ambigous. The writer is having his/her cake and eating it too. I'm sure he-she thinks it is intriguing that they write a villain and a misunderstood anti-hero depending on the viewer's "interpretation". It somehow should help sell the plot which I'm sure involves "redeeming" Adam and still having their mustache twirling villain. When I read the spoiler I wondered why would the character break this picture on purpose? But he was purposely shown with a disturbed look of his own while looking at the picture symbollic of Nick's place in Sharon life then throwing the jacket at it. I would say he did it on purpose, but really I don't care.

Edited by classicmoment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.