Jump to content

Y&R Episodes Discussion, Week of October 26, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 375
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

So how many takes do we think it took for AH and that slap? I liked it it was ok. The scene looked awkwardly edited as if they or someone fell out of character very soon after. Billy is obnoxious and there is no reason to sympathize witht he character I thought I'd somehwat find his motivation by now, not being sold on "anger over my dead niece" angle try agin TPTB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have some questions...

1. Did Billy vacate Nick's building within the allotted time?

2. RS with Victor on the cover was the highest rated issue in a matter of like, two hours?

3. Did Sharon quit Restless Style? She came to quit but never had any conversation with anyone about it other than Chloe.

4. Why the hell would Phick take Summer to Sharon's house for trick or treating? Oh, I know. They did it for purely plot purposes.

5. Why would Sharon be all flirty with the man she knows tried to frame the father-in-law she adored? Even so after he admitted to seducing his male lawyer for personal gain. And on Monday's show, she declares, t

Huh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I buy that he would be ticked off over being used and discarded by Victor. I don't buy for a minute that he cares about Colleen or is doing this for her memory. Just like his cheap shots to the Newmans when she lost her board seat, none of this actually helps her. She's dead. Using her to make himself feel like a big man is disrespectful.

I get more annoyed with the writers than Billy himself when he uses her death as an excuse. It's very cheap. The show had no interest in Colleen when she was alive, but now that she's dead, why not.

soapydoc, I agree with you about not understanding Sharon's thought process. Even taking out what happened with Victor, she should not want to be near someone who confessed to her about manipulating Rafe into bed. She just got out of a marriage with a man she felt was too manipulative, and she should wonder and now she's drawn to a man who is also manipulative and who for all she knows may not even be sure of his sexuality.

If they're going to do this I'd rather they have it where Sharon is subconsciously trying to get back at Nick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's kind of like how Colleen used Brad's death as an excuse to get on the Newman Board. She claimed she wanted to honor his memory, but it seemed more of a way to get back at Victor and Jack using her didn't help.

I got the impression that Billy is the way he is supposedly because he lost Mac. He couldn't deal with that so he gambled, partied, and was a slut. Now that Mac is back why is he still a man child?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, you're right. Colleen did use Brad's death. It's all very tacky. The tackiest is when Shick repeatedly used Cassie's death to drop their drawers, and when we were encouraged to cheer their adultery because it was going to produce a Shick love child which would replace Cassie. Or when Victor acted like an a-hole (even more than usual) last year and we were told it was all because of Sabrina.

I know death is used to propel story, but you can have death as a major part of story without being so craven. When Katherine and Jill battled over Phillip's memory, the show always let us know that these women were both very damaged, that they were using Phillip as a cover. The show never actually said, "Well, it's OK, because Phillip died."

I think they write Billy this way because they think it's fun. And that's fine. I do think it's fun to see Billy pull these stunts on the Newmans. I know it may not be in character, but what else is new. They have backed themselves into a corner because they did spent a lot of time trying to find people to blame for why Billy acts the way he does.

If it were me writing the show (which it's not, thankfully), and I had to keep Billy this way, I would just bring in a new woman onto the show and have her get together with him, and have Billy just say, "I am what I am, it's no one's fault, I'm going to raise hell because it makes me feel good." Then they can scheme, and have a love/hate relationship, sort of like what Santa Barbara used to do with some of their couples.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This could be a start to a good story for Noah. His parents spend so much time on Cassie and her replacement that Noah's almost an afterthought. The show could go into how he feels about that and have him berating his parents for their idiotic behavior.

When Faith is a teenager or older (depending on when Shick find out she's theirs) they could have her deal with being a replacement for her older sister.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think they were going there with Noah by having him disown them, although that has now been dropped, I guess? I don't know.

I've always thought it would be interesting to see a soap story where a child who was conceived in order to help save the life of their older sibling struggles to deal with this as they get older. The only time I've seen that story potential was on AMC, when Barbara and Travis had a child because their other child had leukemia or aplastic anemia or something. But then they were all written out, and Travis is dead, and the boy came to town for a year or two and they did nothing with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That was Daisy? Abby's friend?

Billy is resisting eviction, so they'll probably dump his sh!t into the street. His lawyers are working on it. Sharon's fate remains undetermined...tune in tomorrow. The trick or treating to Sharon's place was odd...but it served a good plot purpose. That's a classic soap tag (Adam, what are you doing here?)...so that one doesn't bother me. Adam and Sharon have been becoming more friendly for the last few weeks. His confession was meant to be bonding.

Billy's motivation is thin, and a bit of a mystery.

Yeah, assuming you weren't being ironic, that might work. Billy's motivation needs to be developed.

Rafe talked him out of it...and the tragedies that followed for his family solidified his sympathy for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

:lol::lol::lol::lol: This is pretty funny and right on the mark! :lol: I happen to find the writing for Sharon & Nick/Sharon pretty parodical and amusing.

Well it appears that because MAB & the motley crew can't write a single original story so we are going with the since I don't know what to do w/Billy right now but Billy Miller is so hot and we've got to find something, let's just give him Nick Newman's story, shall we!! That seemed to work. :lol: So this s/l should not be that hard to follow right down to Phyllis calling Billy, Jack 2.0 on yesterday's eppy. :lol: I can't help already noticing the similarities with the impact of Colleen's death similiar to Cassie's. There is a lot of overcompensating going on with the writing.

And it does look like Daisy is from a rich family...I found it interesting that the 1st person she has scenes with is Abby, a Newman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

On your note regarding "original story"...

I rewatched Victor's "autobiography" from the other day.

The clips were very carefully selected. For example, they showed/mentioned the women who are relevant to today's story (Nikki, Ashley, Hope, and Sabrina was mentioned in a Victor-Victoria quarrel), but not those who aren't (Lorie, Julia, Cassandra).

So too, the very specific mentions of Michael Scott, Rick Daros, and Derek Thurstone were very odd. Thurstone actually got mentioned twice (when Kay asked Victor to guard her company, and when Douglas discussed the duel). That may be accidental (re Thurstone), because it showed an early Kay-Victor meeting, and the delightful Douglas' most delightful story....so Derek may simply have been a side consequence.

Of all the clips, though, the Rick Daros clip was most random. Why?

We know Rick is "out there"...his body was never recovered when he escaped into the sea in scuba gear. AND, we saw Rick years later in a mental institution--I think as an amnesiac--with Eve Howard (although they never developed that story further).

Do you think one of these bad boys is coming back to make trouble for the Newmans? Maybe as

? I'm feeling it....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Just started the May 27 episode and first thing I see is that Willow got an ugly haircut since hte last time i watched
    • I'm pretty sure he was. But point taken. GL really had a thing for masked and costumed balls/parties in the '80's. Everyone looks fabulous, but those poor costume designers.
    • Still here ^^ Come on Prime Video, it's due to bring it back!
    • Got through the eighth season, and it was... painful. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I agree 100% with both you and Mitch64.  Soaps have been going further and further off-course since 1981. TPTB just don't have a fundamental understanding of what makes soap fans so loyal. I'd love to be on a writing team with both of you.  Maybe we could put together a real soap opera, and show people what its all about...  
    • They weren't in town, but Fletcher worked at the paper (and we saw anniversary Journal headlines for the 50th, although I don't remember if Roger was one of them), and I'd think Alex would have at least heard of him due to the damage he did to Spaulding only a few years before her return to the fold. I know I have to remember it's not real life, of course.
    • YES. The videos being uploaded to Spauldingfield are almost to the point where Alan is reintroduced. They're already talking about the guy he pretends to be, and yes, he returns at a masked ball. In fact, that masked ball is almost beat for beat the same as the masked ball where Alex was introduced! Get a new schtick. Before the Kobe era, that's pretty much what they did. Characters would just show up. Maybe other characters would talk about them for a while--the Chamberlains, Tony, Maureen, Andy, Kelly, Carrie--but then they would just appear. When Hope came back, she simply knocked on Bert's door and said something like, "Hi, Grandma, I'm home again." No particular fanfare. Sometimes it would be a bit dramatic--Jennifer and Morgan were introduced when Mike accidentally crashed into their car, for instance, and Alan and Elizabeth were introduced through Jackie's flashbacks when she was remembering giving up Phillip for adoption. Nola was involved in the Roger return. Roger's return in 1980 was very dramatic, but in a way that made total sense. He was trying to kidnap a child, so dressing up as a clown did not seem crazy. The mask bit was not only silly, it didn't even make sense. Alex never knew him, so there was no reason for him to be masked in front of her. Yeah, she knew OF him, but there's that phenomenon called cognetive dissonance. If you see someone outside of an expected situation, you probably won't recognize them, especially if you never met them in person and think they're dead. I bet a CIA spook like Roger would be familiar with that concept. And he didn't have to be skulking around SF for months. Again, I will cut Long a little slack--it was not her idea to bring back Roger, she was told to do it. She never wrote for the character. It was something that was not planned. They originally went to Zaslow to offer him the role of Alan. He, of course, turned them down because that was a ridiculous idea, but then he suggested coming back as Roger. At such short notice, it's not strange his return was not handled well.
    • Eh...but neither had been in town. Know the name Roger Thorpe? Sure. But Alex would have gone crazy trying to memorize all of Alan's co-conspirators/lovers/wives and Fletch didn't even know Roger/Adam was on the island, IIRC. But who knew or should've known each other is always a little dicey when people come back to town. 
    • I wouldn't call Tomas' cuts a modern cut. They appear to be a slim/extreme slim cut⏤cut slimmer down the sides, with a higher armhole, which pulls up/out, depending on the fit of the person's body. Again, I feel like Ms Featherstone is buying to fit the wrong parts of the body; instead of buying to fit their widest parts (shoulders), she's buying things to fit their middle/waist (which is the easiest to ultimately fix without a complete re-cut), and it shows in the finished product. And the only reason it irks me is because I worked in suit sales for nearly ten years, and I notice these things immediately. The fashion(s) on this soap are miles ahead of three of the four others (I like the fashions from Y&R), but the tailoring is a choice, especially where the men are concerned.
    • There probably would have been a good chance they knew of him, especially with his ties to Spaulding and his being involved in so much scandal (meaning there would be plenty of photos and articles around they both would have seen), but I agree the mask was silly, clearly just a TV moment.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy