Jump to content

Y&R Episodes Discussion, Week of October 12, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Alvin, your'e not going to tell me that you have to have things laid out for you that simplistically, are you? God forbid you'd try to watch LOST... you might have a nervous breakdown. We never saw her pop pills, but the scene where she asks kitty where they were... tells us what? It tells us that she WAS on medication, and she lost them, or was out of them, and she was starting to go out of control. When I watched that scene, I said to myself... "So.... the bitch is on crazy pills? This is gonna get interesting"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 302
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Of course at some point Patty will escape and pretend to be the doctor and they can play the same story over again.

That must be some pretty special medication in that it allowed Patty to function as a high powered businesswoman(seemingly with no qualifications or experience)as Paul stated she had been practically homeless and travelled around taking low paid jobs.How he knew this was never explained.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The problem with a Patty double isn't whether or not Stacy Haiduk can pull it off. The story itself is so weak and seems to be made up as it goes along. What does she have to pull off? It's like pulling off a band-aid, and you find another band-aid, then another, then another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yup. Every word here is true too. Patty's qualifications (Kay admired her upon first meeting) are at odds with her vagrant, uneducated existence.

Then again, Victoria is a CEO without ever attending a College class!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOST does not have the luxury of time by airing 5 days a week like Y&R does...

By that, we can assume she was never taking pills during the whole time she was in Genoa City, not even off camera. If she was asking for them, she was obviously suffering from some type of withdrawal.

I find it very hard to believe she would be as stable as she was for those first 3 months without them.

But anyway, Patty is going away, she was only on for shock value and to wreck another core character. It's now all about her lookalike. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Finally read the entire 8 pages.......and yup I was right, lots of OT discussion and I wasn't there to "slap your wrists". :) Well at least you guys used spoiler tags and nobody slipped up.

I like it because now I get two Stacy Haiduk's. LOL This twist is what I wanted for Matt Clarke and for a way Rick Hearst could return to Y&R as a new character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Your'e not understanding what I'm saying. I'm saying she was ON THE PILLS FOR THOSE FIRST THREE MONTHS. The fact that she was desperate to find them, meant she had lost them or JUST ran out a few days previous. She was starting her downward spiral at that time, and she got worse as time went on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It would be nice if they had let us know any of this instead of us having to make it up for ourselves. Then again this is the team that had to have Eileen Davidson let viewers know that Ashley wasn't carrying a dead fetus in her womb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think it matters anymore, because she'll be shipped off to a nuthouse and Stacy's new character will be be on the front-burner in some asinine story about Jack falling in love with the woman that was the plastic surgery model for his loony ex-wife that stalked him, raped him, and indirectly caused the death of his niece. At least that's what I see in the future...

And we have no idea if they plan on delving into Patty's past or why she is the way she is. I'm betting we'll never know, or it will be glossed over - like everything else on this show is.

Word.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I assume TPTB hadn't anticipated Haiduk's popularity when they made Patty an irredeemable psycho and that's why they're doing this story. I'm okay with it if this new character is well developed and properly integrated into the cast (maybe as a love interest for Neil or Malcolm). I'd be prepared to forget Patty ever existed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And we'd have very good reason, given how ridiculous and outlandish this show has been this year.

I don't need to see another double on this show ever again, which means, it's likely to happen again anyway. <_<

Again, it's all about strategy, which the people at Y&R fail miserably at. If they wanted to bring Stacy in as a new character, at least wait until the dust was settled with Patty and a few months after the character was phased out. Granted, it would still be a stupid idea to have another doppelganger, but at least two characters with the same face wouldn't be on at the same time, even if one is going away soon. It's like how they created an asinine baby switch just as someone died and someone else was getting a heart transplant. It was a huge strategic error and too many depressing antics going on at once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Agreed. The Emmys next year are gonna be a pretty tough competition and I hope we get a Days sweep lol  Not only does Deidre deserve a nomination for these last few weeks, but I also think Paul Telfer, Raven Bowens, Carson Boatman, Dan Feuerriegel and Alison Sweeney have good chances as well.
    • It’s not about a lack of faith and trust in MVJ, it’s about a a lack of faith and trust in Ron Carlivati, who I think can be very sneaky and manipulative when he wants to be.  And, all that “He’s just a breakdown writer” talk never changed my mind about anything, because at Days, it was “just a breakdown writer” that gave us some of the worst episodes I’ve ever seen. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy