Jump to content

AMC vs. OLTL


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

That's because Burke had a leg up. She not only had history producing Nixon creations, she was an AMC director while Nixon was still active in the plotting of the show. So she knew what old AMC felt like, which, to me, is why she was able to incorporate that more than Carruthers has ever done or ever will do.

But Francesca James was the show's last great show runner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That was such a fascinating show. If only they'd had better headwriters.

I guess Burke actually cared about AMC, while Carruthers does not? It's sad how many soap producers now don't care about their shows. And how many proceed to go make dumb comments to the press.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The problem with Carruthers is that she doesn't have the history to care. Felicia Behr, Francesca James, Jean Burke all held previous jobs at the show prior to becoming EPs. Carruthers has no history with the show and I still don't think she gets what its about.

I don't like to pit Agnes Nixon's creations against each other. They deserve to both live on.

Having said that, let's try to get General Hospital ousted. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agreed tho not as much as Francesca James (she still directs for the show--she should come back--i guess she won't move to LA though). Though one reason Burke's AMC was more Nixonish may have been that shrotly aftershe joined AMC, Nixon came on for her last stint as official co headwriter and did so many great thigns (besides the famolus Bianca lesbian story she created Greenlee and Greenlee's snobby grandparents, Marian wanting to fit into Pine Valley society, all thsoe kinda small touches) Still if Ed Scott wants to replace Carruthers, I'd be thrilled

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

urke actually got some decent writing out of Brown/Esensten (on both Loving and City). The first 10 months of City were kidna rough but the last 6 months I thought were good--in fact it was becoming my fave soap at the moment in itslast few months AND it was the only ABC soap at the time whose ratings were *claimbing* not dropping. But by then it had already been canceled.

Carruthers has NO vision for the show. it's true that under her AMC has not had the msot ideal headwriters, but I thinks he deserves far more criticism from fans than she gets--an EP *is* somewhat responsible for the direction the headwriter takes (I mean we know that Megan McTavish is basically a yes woman who is as strong as her EP allows her to be). Aside from that the show has looked like cheap crap unde rher anyway--so WHY is she there? No vision for the show, no direction, and poor production values. Seriously I'd want her out before I'd want Pratt or any writers out--she's had more than enough time to prove herself.

I agree I'd like to get GH ousted first--OLTL and AMC ar emy shows (that said all bias has to be admitted--AMC has been my show since I was 10 and got me into soaps so...) I do think though this whole discussion is kinda silly--it seems clear ABC wants to stop making soaps in NYC and they decided to move AMC not OLTL, sad as that is for OLTL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy