Jump to content

Guiding Light Discussion Thread


Paul Raven

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I get the criticism about the Ben Reade storyline, but it was compelling t.v. and Matt Bomer was sensational. He should have won the Emmy. The Maryann Carruthers storyline was an attempt to tell an umbrella storyline which I like, and while it insulted the memory of viewers, there were compelling moments/episodes. I don't known if that storyline is worse than the traveling through a painting, cloning, Amish Reva, kissing cousins, Tangie, etc. It always amuses me that for all the criticism of Conboy, it was a backside that got him fired. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Talk about your really low bar! 

I don't know if that is true, exactly, but he should have been fired for financial malfeasance. Budget, didn't have one, so what? If there is some way to spend when you don't have money to spend, apparently some people have a way with it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To me that story that worse than any of the other plots you mentioned. I grew up watching Ben and then I had to see him used in a plot that told viewers if you are sexually abused, you will become a serial killer, and you should commit suicide. I could never forgive that storyline. I think it was the antithesis to everything GL was supposed to be - the lighthouse, redemption and a better way. If I wanted to watch that I would watch Ryan Murphy's perversions.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Maeve could do her own unique version of what I like to refer to as the ‘soap opera seethe’. I don’t watch any of today’s current daytime soaps (hopefully that changes next year) but I doubt anyone does something on this level. The restraint to hold back fury, while giving the appearance of having ice in one’s veins that they could freeze someone completely out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The fact that Wheeler was never hired in daytime again says alot. I’d rather GL ended earlier than the idiotic Peapack crap. Go out with dignity. GL did not do that because of Wheeler. It’s show business. You lose jobs. It happens.  I’ll never forgive Ellen Wheeler for what she did to GL. Peapack? How stupid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Awhile back I read an account by Matt Bomer about his time at Guiding Light. If this does not chill you to your very core. I have no idea what else anyone could say. 

https://michaelfairmantv.com/matt-bomer-recalls-ben-reades-dark-storylines-on-guiding-light-revealing-he-told-writers-just-throw-the-kitchen-sink-at-me-and-they-did/2015/06/27/

 

Next, Matt told a hilarious synopsis of the storylines of Ben Reade during his year in Springfield, when he told Seth Meyers:   “I was a trust fund baby who bet my fraternity brothers that I could deflower the town virgin. I fell in love with her, but she found out about the bet and dumped me.  Then, I met a new girlfriend, lost my trust fund and was embarrassed to tell her so I became a male prostitute .. that’s what you do when you lose your trust fund. (Laughs).  So I had all these cougar clients that that were these women I would meet at 6 in the morning and by 9am we would be in the bed making out together for five minutes.  Then my girlfriend found out I was a male prostitute, dumped me of course, and then I went crazy, killed five people, kidnapped her to a remote cabin in the woods, confessed to her that I’d been molested by my middle school teacher, and then committed suicide in front of her, her father, and her new boyfriend. Then, hung on for one day in the hospital to confess my sins!”

The biggest laugh was at the end of Bomer’s recanting of the story of Ben on Guiding Light when he added, “My favorite moment is when the writers came up to me at the end of it and they go, ‘Listen, if you ever want to come back, we’ve got it figured out.’  (Laughs).   Matt always wondered just how they could do that! Evil twin?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would just point out, although I am quite sure it is something obvious to most of us soap fans. Going from 1970 when there were 19 soaps on the air, to a point where 12 were, on down to now, when there are four, soon to be five, more people who once worked in soaps, after their show was canceled did not find comparable work available to them in daytime. That does not say anything AT ALL significant about them. It's just the reality of the situation. not nearly enough jobs to support the numbers of people who previously worked in this industry that we love so much. Yes, it's true, FACTS matter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It seems to be a skill that's died out. Vanessa would probably be seen as "boring" by today's standards. The ironic thing is Maeve's acting is subtle---Vanessa rarely is. You know exactly where you stand with her. It makes the times she snaps mean so much more. 

There's a point about a year after Billy left her at the altar where they're arguing again (I think it's over her running Lewis Oil) and Billy pushes her buttons about her "punishing" him for it, and she snaps on him hard--"you nearly killed me you sonofabitch." And it's like whoa buddy. 

Stuff like that's what made little Beth Raines being able to rattle Vanessa unbearable to me. 

Edited by P.J.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This reminds of Kathryn Hays, in a way, though Vanessa and Kim were on opposite sides of the same coin. Vanessa could be cool to people, to the point of icing them out. Kim was perceptibly a warmer character who came off as “sunny” but when she snapped, it could make your head spin. Judging by the “Golly!” and “Kiddo”s, just by her tone, she made it clear how she felt. John Dixon was on the receiving end of both eye rolls, haughty laughter and a shaking of the head, so we always knew how Kim felt.

Neither actress got their due for how consistently they delivered their performances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I cannot ever say enough good about Maureen Garrett. Also she is smart & savvy, a great citizen & one who believes in the stewardship of the earth. She was one who was outspoken about the changes to the show. She described the process as if the actors were herded like cattle. I don't know how she stood at least 2 of her final stories. That ridiculous kidnapping of all of the kids and then Roger's son, Sebastian, who locked her in a cell & then tried to kiss her. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not only kill Ross,  but have Rick and Phillip be indirectly responsible for it (oh yes and trying to make Phillip a James Stenbeck/Stefano BIG BAD.) They could have easily left it that no body was found...(poor Blake..ending up with...Frank Cooper!!!)

 

McKinsey at least knew the show. No..everyone knew they were getting ready to put GL and ATWT to bed for good. Wheeler was a choice for a reason..she came cheap and she didn't what the hell she was doing so the death was being hastened by assinging a well meaning but inept doctor to the patient on life support. She was a usefull idiot. Gautman on the other hand knew exactly what was going on. Its no mistake the Rauch "retired" when he did, as tacky as he was he still knew what GL was and how to put a show together and he didn't want to be there to the end.

That was it...Wheeler was given a show that had no budget, because of Conboy. Rauch had the show looking good and spruced up some sets before he left...the  New Years Eve episodes with the Bauer House look great..Conboy blew it all on and tanked the budget.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Indeed. Conboy fixed it. He spent, they say at least, money that he did not have to spend, leaving Wheeler with a "deficit spending budget" whatever the hell that is.

Besides Paul Rauch retiring just at that oh so convenient moment. MADD herself, also retired. And, when she did, as we know, P&G for some god forsaken reason decided AT THAT MOMENT, not a minute before, to do away entirely with the position P&G's Executive in Charge of Production. IOW, the literal go between, the only buffer, between show EP & CBS's HEAD OF DAYTIME!

Edited by Contessa Donatella
info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm screaming at those clips and gifs.  THIS IS PURE GOLD.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's always been my thought. I can't imagine that the show would play up the unseen AD so far in advance without them casting a *star*. After today's episode, I wonder if he'll somehow be connected with Diane. It was strange that Diane mentioned her very distant family today. I can't recall Diane ever talking about her backstory. Maybe he's her much younger brother?  It's also possible he's connected to Diane during her time in LA. Sally's already said she crossed paths with him. OC, I think Dumas is Mariah's mistake.... As a side note, it was good to see some mixing it up - Adam with Clare/Kyle and Sharon with Tessa.
    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York   Steel Magnolias: The leading ladies: Dolly Parton: "She is one of the sunniest and most natural of actresses," Roger Ebert wrote. Imagining that she probably saw Truvy as an against-type role, Hinson concluded it's still well within her wheelhouse. "She's just wearing fewer rhinestones." Sally Field: "Field, as always, is a lead ball in the middle of the movie," according to Denby . M'Lynn giving her kidney to Shelby brought out David's bitchy side. "I can think of a lot more Sally Field organs that could be sacrificed." Shirley MacLaine: "(She) attacks her part with the ferociousness of a pit bull," Hinson wrote. "The performance is so manic that you think she must be taking off-camera slugs of Jolt." (I agree. If there was anyone playing to the cheap seats in this movie, it's Shirley.) Olympia Dukakis: "Excruciating, sitting on her southern accent as if each obvious sarcasm was dazzlingly witty," Denby wrote. Daryl Hannah: "Miss Hannah's performance is difficult to judge," according to Canby, which seems to suggest he took a genuine "if you can't say something nice ..." approach. Julia Roberts: "(She acts) with the kind of mega-intensity the camera cannot always absorb," Canby wrote. That comment is so fascinating in light of the nearly 40 years Julia has spent as a Movie Star. She is big. It's the audience who had to play catch up. And on that drag-ish note ... The movie itself: "You feel as if you have been airlifted onto some horrible planet of female impersonators," Hinson wrote. Canby: "Is one supposed to laugh at these women, or with them? It's difficult to tell." Every review I read acknowledged the less than naturalistic dialogue in ways both complimentary (Ebert loved the way the women talked) and cutting (Harling wrote too much exposition, repeating himself like a teenager telling a story, Denby wrote). Harling wrote with sincerity and passion, Canby acknowledged, but it's still a work of "bitchiness and greeting card truisms." The ending was less likely to inspire feeling good as it was feeling relieved, according to Denby. "(It's) as if a group of overbearing, self-absorbed, but impeccable mediocre people at last exit from the house."
    • I tend to have two minds about Tawny (Kathy Najimy) fainting during Soapdish's big reveal. You're the costume designer, if anything, you should have known the whole time. I guess it's an application of what TV Tropes calls the "Rule of Funny." Every time I watch Delirious, I always want the genuine romance in John and Mariel's reunion at the deli counter to last longer. Film critics had their knives out for Sally in this period. I'll start a separate thread on the movies page.
    • I don't think so, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was Dumas this whole time.
    • Tamara Tunie was serving up grand dame diva fierceness.
    • Nick told Victoria that he and Sharon had married in England.  Victoria was shocked.  Then she realized he was kidding.  He confirmed it was a joke and they're platonic. I don't even know what to say about that.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy