Jump to content

Y&R: Episodes discussion, week of September 21


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 308
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

IA Julia. Everytime I see Beth on the show, I remember how much I miss her on this show. She should be the moral compass of the Abbotts that John used to be.

Aside from Gloria/Kevin/Deacon/Amber, I enjoyed today's show. IA with alot of what alphanguy said regarding the episode, and I have to say that MM stuck out like a sore thumb in that scene with Victor in the hospital. For cryin' out loud, he delivered his lines the same way! Whether he was saying "I brought you your book, etc. etc" to "Wake up and see what your bad seed son has done". That's what struck me as waaaay out of touch with the character. It all ran together, the same tone, the same expression, the same everything. Who does that???

The other thing about this episode is that it was so dark. Surprise, Surprise. I remember when there were some lighter moments weaved in with the heavy emotional stuff. Those days are gone. All that being said, I thought the episode wasn't bad. Not great, but not bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I understand, Alvin. But don't you think this show is missing someone like Traci? I would hope - HOPE - that she would not become a victim...but with this regime you never know. Traci could be the "tent pole" character as Maureen was on GL. And Beth Maitland is so completely mezmerizing (at least to me) when she's on-screen.

I say bring her back! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

"tent pole" characters are only good when shows are heavily rooted in family dynamics. As far as I'm concerned, Y&R hasn't been rooted in family dynamics since Kay Alden's tenure, the show lost some of that direction under Smith, and Latham tried but failed, and this regime has killed it.

The Abbots only come together when one of them is hurt or dead, other than that, they seem to never really interact on a consistent basis. The Newman's are a DISASTER. The Winter's are a travesty, and they tried with the Chancellor's/Jill, but it hasn't worked, I hate what they've done to the Jill character.

If Y&R was a multi-dimensional show that wrote for nurturing/strong female characters, then Traci would have a place. Since they're not interested in that or in exploring real family dynamics, I shutter to think what Traci would become if they kept her on full-time.

Y&R has no heart anymore, it's just one big black hole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I certainly love Traci, but Sheffer loathes characters like her. If she stayed, she would either be killed, or become a very cold, bitter woman who lives to make Ashley and Billy look better.

Better to have our memories, then perhaps she can return when the people who hate family and friendship are finally kicked out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Does this Abby remind you any of the brief Sarah Aldrich Victoria recast?

I always liked Sarah when she was on PC. I wouldn't mind seeing her return as a Grace recast. I don't like Jennifer Gareis and she seems to be the big leading lady at B&B anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, I can't really debate the fact that every family on this show rarely interacts unless there is a crisis of some kind. ICAM with you on that point.

However, if the show is ever to get it's heart back, isn't the Traci character the perfect place to start? Don't get me wrong, I am not wearing rose-colored glasses where MAB and Co. is concerned, but I would hope that they could at least write ONE character (Traci) in a better light. I have nothing to base that on, by the way. So I suppose my argument is moot. :)

OTOH, if y'all have read that article of Hogan's ATWT and his comment about giving men their "balls" back, it's pretty scary thinking he's writing this show now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The only way this show will get any heart or any of its real identity back is if we get people running it that want that, since we don't, it'll probably never happen. :(

You know it's bad when I think even Megan McTavish's writing on various soaps had more heart and depth to it than this s.hit.

Ideally, Traci should have been back in a more permanent basis ages ago. Since John Abbot is killed off, she could provide a stabling force in the Abbot family, but that's not going to happen, especially since the show seems to be going in a direction where heart and family doesn't matter.

Hogan has never really cared about family dynamics or about giving heart and humanity to any of his shows. I'm not surprised he's bringing that crap to this show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And the sad thing about those actors, they're on regular recurring and can appear more often, yet they're neglected.

I excused their neglect in the beginning, but there's no excuse for why those characters aren't being used more regularly now.

But the funny thing about most of those characters is that they're strong professional women, you know, the type Y&R doesn't recognize anymore.

It's sad. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy