Jump to content

Y&R: Episodes discussion, Week of August 31


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Beth Maitland is great, I just wished she was back for a better storyline and one that's actually good. Ashley is pathetic and I'm so sick of this overall storyline. Nothing to do with pacing, I just think it sucks and the motivations for it all are almost nonexistent.

I also wish Traci wasn't just brought back for the stunt/shock and awe event that's coming up on Sept 17th...

The Abbot family dynamics has been missing for a long time, they all seem so isolated. Now that John is dead, Traci is the emotional center and calm one in that family. It would be wise to establish her as some type of matriarchal figure in that family.

Y&R has sorely lacking family dynamics for a while now, and whenever family members are together, it just feels so false and hallow.

The Newman family is the one that needs the most work, but the Abbots need work too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 127
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Administrator

That was awesome! It made me like Billy today. I also loved his line to Jack about if/when he goes after Victor, it's him that it's in the line of fire, unlike Jack who puts other people in the line of fire.

I didn't love it that much. :o

And dammit, Alvin, stop posting spoilers and talking about what's going to happen two weeks from now! ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ha ha!!! I didn't expect you to, Toups :) Testosterone filled heroic studs just get to me. It reminded me of the scene where John Enos did the whole "saving of Nikki" scene. Great stuff. I always liked Billy... he's just always so irresponsible. But today wev'e seen the beginnings of MATURITY, and I like it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought that was a very odd line, since he has never gone after Victor until very recently, and only because he learned Jill and Victor worked against him to help Cane. He also has never lost anything in a feud with Victor, whereas Jack has, because Jack's been taking the lumps for over twenty years.

Billy always knows how to make it all about himself.

I feel sorry for PB. They keep phasing Jack out of more and more of the story. I guess they think the more weak they make Jack look, the tougher Billy will be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As long as we all realize this, like Nina, is a new Traci.

It makes perfect sense that both have grown up, and are now mature and strong. Moreover, especially since so few women on the show are like this now, I like it very much. I can't wait to see either Nina or Traci on my screen.

But the writers have done 180s with their characters. Let us not forget how very NOT strong Nina was for most of her time on the show (David Kimble, falling into clinical depression, trapping P3 to get money and a family, etc.). Let us not forget how very NOT strong Traci was (insecure/overweight fan club president, getting sucked in by Dr. Tim Sullivan, buying Lisa's lies, attempted suicide when she got pregnant, Lauren's emotional browbeating of her time-and-again).

This is a case where I have no problem with the character changes because [ a ] they are appealing, and [ b ] it is plausible that the actresses would have changed thus after years of (off camera) life experience.

These character changes, IMO, are no different than what has happened to Patty, whose evolution also happened off camera.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think the character changes go beyond what advances the plot. They had to make Nina strong because she was the one who uncovered the truth about Cane. Since that time, she just pops up occasionally to meddle in her son's love life or talk with Phillip (since she forgave him within a week).

It was only a few years ago when Traci returned and was an emotional wreck over John's death. Now she is the strong one because they can't focus on the Abbotts currently on the show, as they all let Ashley slide into the depths, and because they need to use Traci to show us how pathetic Jack is supposed to be.

It's also easier to be a stronger character when you are not around on a permanent basis. Women who are around more often are more likely to be degraded for story purposes. Look at the difference in Ashley when she briefly returned for Victor's wedding and how she has been since she came back for good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can accept change in Nina and Traci, since neither character is driving any story and both are going to be on for a limited amount of time. It's not like they turned both characters into a victims, or stupid people who think a man is the center of their universe, like they've done with all the contract women on the show.

Oh please, both Traci and Nina left on happy terms and from what we've known, both had successful lives outside of Genoa City, which could have helped them get stronger.

We still have no idea what's driving Patty Jane to do the things she's doing and we know she didn't leave town a complete wreck.

And please don't tell me that's going to be explained AFTER Patty's reeked so much havoc on the show in such a short amount of time. Again, we haven't been given the slightest clue as to why she's doing the things she's doing.

Traci made periodic visits, Patty was forgotten about until they conveniently needed a psycho to come into Jack and Victor's universe.

Sorry, none of this should be rationalized. It's not in the writing and has never been.

Also, unlike Patty, neither Traci or Nina are leading any story and neither are going around town killing animals and core characters (you know who). Not like either character has taken an EXTREME 180. They're extremely supporting characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly.

There is no plausible explanation for the Patty Jane character, since all we've been told is that "She's crazy!" What can of justification is that? Again, they haven't laid any groundwork or clued us into anything that triggered this personality change, and sorry that should have been done as she's doing all these bad things, not after she's killed people and animals and does it more than once...

All I can say is, if Jack is ever romantically linked to Patty Jane in the near future, I would never be able to buy that. Not only did she rape him, but she's responsible for the

, if anyone in the Abbott family looks past that, it would be an example of the vile, hallow, and badly planned storytelling that's so evident with this regime.

Patty Jane's crimes can't be whitewashed, she's done too much harm and she'll be doing more in the future. It's foolish to want her to stick around, she's beyond ruined. Redemption arc my ass. This woman needs to be sent to a nuthouse, I cannot plausibly see anyone in Genoa City bestowing forgiveness on her after all she's pulled and "she was just crazy!" is not a damn excuse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually, the MYSTERY of what became of Patty has kept many a long time fan wondering. And there WAS something in the writing. I beleive it was 1996 (not sure of the year, but I know it was the 90's) but Paul began talking to Lynn and to Lauren about Patty, saying that she'd used to send a christmas card to their mother once a year, but he nor Mary ever hears from her, and doesn't even know where she lives.... and he can't figure out why. We have about two weeks of this buildup, even him talking with Mary about it, and then we have the infamous "phone booth scene", where we see a blonde woman from the back, trying to call Mary, and the phone ringing in a dark, empty house. Then NOTHING. I know some don't like to remember this because it's Bill Bell dropping something without explanation, but it DID happen, and to this day, I STILL haven't found ANYONE who has the scoop on what went on? It looked on the surface that they were in negotiations to bring back Lilibet Stern, and they fell through.... but I don't know anyone who's ever confirmed this. I'm still mystified by it. But there WAS some mysterious groundwork laid around 12 year ago. And sorry... we ARE just going to have to wait until the end to find the motivation. Nothing wrong with that, hell.. most prime time shows employ that. But then again, my favorite show is Space: 1999, where in many cases you NEVER find out the motivation. It leaves the viewer to ponder. It's called, deep, psychological drama.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know about that, but there was no significance to it. Patty hasn't been mentioned by Jack or Paul in YEARS. They seemed to have forgotten her existence.

Hence again, if they needed to revive a psycho, why didn't they just bring Mari Jo Mason back? She has a history with BOTH Jack and Victor.

Yep, but that was all 13 years ago, and nothing was made of it. It's not similar in any way to how Traci and Nina might be different from what we saw years ago.

Again, laying out clues and hints as to why people are doing the bad things they're doing is standard soap opera. Having them do bad things and using the explanation that they're "just crazy" is not an excuse. How are people supposed to understand the thought process of these "villains" or even sympathize with them if they just see them murdering people, murdering dogs, and causing a little girl brain damage? We haven't even been given a HINT in the writing as to what caused her to go off the edge.

Maybe this is perfectly suitable for primetime, but unfortunately, a daily soap like Y&R has 5 days a week year round to plot and pace its stories, yet complete beats are skipped and the pacing is atrocious. There is no excuse for this, and simply saying she's nuts is not a justification for her behavior.

IF they reveal her try motivation after she's caused so much harm to many people, then what is the use? She already harmed too many people and while she was doing it, we were never given so much as a hint as to why she's doing the bad things she's doing and what caused her to go to this point in her life and now. The motivation of the characters on this show is very poorly defined.

Well, on a soap opera that airs 5 days a week year around and only does things for shock value and does complete stunts these days, it's called bad plotting, bad pacing, and overall lazy writing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You do realize what your'e saying... your'e saying you want this show to be PREDICTBALE. Being predictable, while I LOVED it... also made the ratings cut in HALF before LML or Maria ever darkened the doorstep of HW. So what do you do in that situation? My main point is that you might not like it.... but revealing motivation at the end of a story or not at all is not neccisarily LAZY, it's a legitimate style of storytelling. That has nothing to do with any skipped beats. Not giving characters enough dialogue or screen time is skipping beats....I don't see them skipping much of anything with Patty or Ashley's gaslgiht SL. With Rafe, YES.... with Phillip, YES. With Jill... HELL YES. But the thing is, we DO have a hint of motivation, and it's MENTAL ILLNESS. You might poo-poo such thing as motivation, but it's realistic... just ask THOM. I still think the "Where did you put my pills, Kitty?" was a big foreshadowing of the reason for her mental state. Mental illness is a real thing, and I don't know why you discount it out of hand, like it's NOTHING. It's something alot of people struggle with, and alot of people keep hidden and secret, because people such as yourself are so damn flippant about it, acting like it's no reason for not being able to function like a normal person, etc..it's obvious your'e young, and still have that feeling of "invincibility" that most young people have. I WISH I still had it, but life will hit you in the face with an anvil at some point, and you'll understand what I'm saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No, I want the show to make sense. Cluing the audience into why someone is doing bad thing is standard soap opera. You don't have to GIVE IT ALL AWAY, you tease the audience with it, so they're interested and want to know more about it. You don't simply skip over teasing the audience and then using the lame excuse "she's just crazy!"

And Maria's storytelling causd the wrost ratings erosion in Y&R's history, so?

Again, maybe for episodic and primetime shows, but not on daytime.

Not delving into a character's thought process and not teasing the audience as to what caused her to become a psycho is LAZY and is a beat that's been IGNORED.

Hell, viewers were able to sympathize and understand initially why Sheila was as psychotic as she was and at least partly understand why she was doing all the crap she was doing. Not all was given away, but we were teased and clued into what made her tick. She was/is a complete lunatic, but we could at least in part understand where she was coming from, and not ALL was given away at the BEGINNING in the initial Sheila story.

I find crazy Sheila better developed than what we have now as Patty Williams.

It's safe to assume that all the villains and psychos that were on soaps had SOME MENTAL ILLNESS. But again, that is not a real motivation or excuse. Something had to trigger it all, and we're not clued into what triggered Patty's, it simply doesn't exist in the writing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Our next installment of Love of Life 1976 Before leaving San Francisco, Cal phones her Aunt Van to set up a family gathering. Van arranges it, and upon their return, Cal and Rick announce that they are engaged. In the shocked silence that follows the announcement, Meg steps in to offer her congratulations, and also to pay for the wedding. But the family members still don’t respond happily. They fear that Rick isn’t good enough for Cal, and are surprised by Meg’s offer. Rick and Jamie visit Meg and ask whether, in light of her acceptance of his marrying her daughter, she |will drop the lawsuit. She replies that she will if he returns as her partner in Beaver Ridge. Rick reminds her that this has been settled; he can’t do that. So Meg, pretending largesse, says she’ll drop the suit, but in fact she asks her attorney to put the suit in abeyance, so it can be reopened at any time. Rick gives Cal a lovely diamond-and-sapphire engagement ring, and Betsy, who has promised to be Cal’s honor attendant, gives ‘her the dress she wore when she married Ben, saying that a bride who really is a bride should have it. Cal speaks privately to each member of the family, hoping to convince them that she and Rick are right for each other and will be happy. Jamie, after accepting Rick’s request that he be best man, checks to see if Meg has dropped the action, as promised. Finding out that it’s only in abeyance, Jamie asks if she is planning to sue her son-in-law in the future. Meg insists that she has acted on her attorney’s advice. Meg convinces Cal to give her two weeks to plans a lovely wedding, but after several days Cal discovers that Meg has done nothing in preparation. She therefore informs her mother that she and Rick will be married this weekend at the chapel. Betsy goes into labor and has her daughter by the natural-childbirth method. Cal tries to reach Ben, to tell him he’s a father, but has to be content with leaving a message. An ecstatic Ben sends flowers and a card to his wife and daughter Suzanne. Meg, in desperation at being unable to stop the wedding, has been drinking heavily. When she tells Carrie she can’t sleep and that’s why she can’t get herself together, Carrie sympathetically gives her some tranquilizers which Tom had given her. At the wedding rehearsal Meg tries once again to “reason” with Rick, but he makes it clear that he and Cal are getting married as planned. Meg then faints, upsetting Cal, who declares that her mother’s health is more important than the wedding. This gives Meg an idea. On the afternoon of the wedding, as the bride’s party waits at the chapel for Meg, she takes some of the pills, then calls Rick and tells him what she has done. When he doesn’t believe her, Meg becomes even more upset and takes more pills. When Rick informs | the wedding party of Meg’s call, they don’t believe she’d do anything that foolish, but Cal and Rick realize they can’t take the chance and go to her home. Finding her unconscious, they rush her to the hospital.Meg is treated for overdose complicated by alcohol and eventually regains consciousness.Van and Bruce offer to take Meg to their, home to recuperate, but Cal, worried because Joe raises the concern that Meg could try it again, allows her mother ‘to convince her to take her home with her. Meg is pleased with herself for having managed to come between Cal and Rick, and begs Cal not to let Rick come to the apartment, as she can’t bear to have him see her like this. Meg then works on Cal’s conscience by pitifully admitting that she loves Rick and can’t live without him. Van tries,- without success, to make Meg see that Cal and Rick are in love and can make each other happy, but Meg won’t give up and suddenly begins to have “headaches.” Even Betsy overcomes her bitterness at Meg and brings baby Suzanne to see her,trying to get Meg interested in living again. But Meg insists she can’t do anything because of her delicate | condition and has no interest in Beaver Ridge at all. .Rick has to go to New York on business and asks Cal to go with him. She replies that she can’t; she’s afraid to leave Meg. Cal, with Hank, sees Rick off at the airport, and just before he boards, he gives her a letter to read later. She reads it at home that evening; -it’s a plea from Rick to join him in New York and get married immediately. He tells her that their love and their being together are the only things that matter.Cal puts the letter in her handbag and goes to shower.Meg has seen the letter and reads it. Upset that Cal might do what Rick asks, she goes to Joe at the clinic, claiming she’s sleeping badly, and asks for sleeping pills. Joe, of course, refuses to give them to her, and, as she has hoped, he calls Cal to warn her. Cal now redoubles her efforts to keep an eye on her - mother. Meg, complaining of another headache, asks for water to take aspirin and takes four tablets from abottle, which she holds so Cal can see the label has been removed. When Cal snatches it and demandsto know what she’s taking and where she got them,Meg “confesses” that she went to a new doctor for sleeping pills because Joe wouldn’t give her any. Seeing she’s got Cal where she wants her, Meg presses Cal to promise she’ll be there as long as she needs her. Rick’s New York trip comes to nothing when he discovers the prospective backers want almost complete control of the project. Jamie suggests that Rick talk to Meg again about dropping the suit, as every cent Rick has is being tied up by this litigation. Rick insists that Meg won’t do any favors for him, and he isconvinced that her suicide attempt and subsequent emotional instability are just a scheme to tie Cal to her. But he realizes Cal won’t be able to see it this way. Rick sees only one more possibility to his financial problem: Ray Slater promised to help him if hearranged a meeting between Ray and Jamie, which Rick did. As a result of that meeting, Ray informed Ian Russell that he might be able to get Beaver Ridge for him but will require a piece of the action if it works out. Rick arrives home to find a distraught Cal, who informs him that she was warned by Joe to watch out for Meg and, sure enough, she discovered her trying to pass sleeping pills off as aspirin. But Rick insists on knowing the name of the doctor Meg got the pills from, and when he attempts to call him, Meg backs down and admits there was no doctor and no sleeping pills—the bottle contained her allergy medication. Cal is horrified that she allowed herself to be taken in again by Meg in spite of knowing firsthand what her mother is like and warnings from the entire family. Rick insists that she get away from Meg now and go visit Betsy until he gets things settled. As soon as Cal has gone, Rick insists that Meg come out of the bedroom where she has barricaded herself, and tells her he knows her too well to believe she would ever take her own life. He tells her he admires her and would like them to come out of this as friends. Meg makes it clear that friendship isn’t what she wants from him. But when Rick picks up Cal, who now wants to get married right away, and | returns to her apartment, they find a note from her “loving mother” saying she and Rick are now friends and they should call her after they are married.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • As always, really interesting to get your impressions! I was only watching sporadically during this period (whereas I was transfixed during the Marian storyline), but if I remember correctly 1996 was a pretty rough transitional year. It came at a period where P&G was playing musical chairs with its executive producers--ATWT was hit especially hard by this. The current executive producer, Michael Laibson, is out in November 1996, replaced by Paul Rauch, who stays for nearly 6 years. While Rauch has a few really bad ideas that cause long-term damage to the show, those don't really kick in until 1999, and his first couple of years are very strong. So once you get to 1997, you should see the show rebound significantly. 
    • Haha love a little drunk posting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I’m up to April 01, 1996. I think I’m starting to understand what many have said.. things are different. I miss the community vibe of Springfield, when you had people working at the hectic newspaper, the choatic diner, the rich were coming in for coffee, or the TV network was abuzz about the latest scandal. Things have become a little more tunneled into their own storylines. Right now, for me anyway, there isn’t a strong desire to see what happens next, ever since the Brent/Marian story ended. It was a darker, more suspenseful storyline that really got me intrigued and waiting to see what happens next, while everything else was just a nice view of midwestern families living their dramatic lives. And I love that too, when the characters and storytelling is strong, but right now, some things are a little stale. In these last 5 weeks, we had two bigger events: Nick and Susan’s wedding:  it was sweet, but I really found it weird they played music over their vows instead of being able to hear them. Then, they leave town immediately after and for good? We really didn’t get a ton of time with them - one minute Susan is in a hospital bed, post-coma, celebrating the new year, and now she’s married and gone. I’m having a hard time with the revolving door of characters since my early ’95 watch. This year we’ve lost so many characters, gained so many characters, and to what end? Henry’s funeral:  this was so sad, considering the real actor passed. I’m curious what other fans thought about the funeral. Granted, when an actor passes, you don’t have much time to plan ahead, so you need to insert it into whatever storylines are happening at the time.  But sadly, this funeral happened when everyone was hating each other. Vanessa was upset with Matt because the Amanda secret came out and he kept it from her. Quint showed up, with his very young affair no less, which made both Nola and J upset. Amanda was there which upset both Blake and Ross. Roger insisted he give a speech which upset everyone. Vanessa was mad at Quint for bringing his young girlfriend, and then Dinah was so upset about her grandfather, which was emotional, but everyone is currently at odds with Dinah. The flashbacks were effective, and the most emotional scene was Vanessa’s breakdown when reading Henry’s letter to her.  Otherwise, it was a pretty hateful funeral, which felt icky. Otherwise, my quick pros and cons currently happening… Pros: Alex and Hawk are great and funny. He gets under her skin and it’s hilarious to watch her react, but she needs him. They were in LA trying to get dirt on Amanda’s former life and Hawk was living it up with young gorgeous women and all the spending money at his disposal.  Generally, the Amanda and her secret storyline is interesting and I really like the actress. Alex vs. Amanda is entertaining. Tina came onto the scene around the time Nadine died, but she’s been given a backstory which is interesting to me now. She’s a prostitute, who means well, and is trying to take care of her daughter, Dahlia. She grew up with Frank, who has a soft spot for her. Marcus, in a new storyline he desperately needed away from Dinah and his dad, has taken a strong liking to Dahlia. She sings well and he plays saxophone well, so their music is endearing. Sadly, Tina got involved in a robbery gone-bad, where they held up a Spaulding board of directors meeting. She flees, but Frank catches her outside and is forced to arrest her, while Cleary (she’s back!) arrests the main bad guy involved and saves the Spaulding family. I’m curious to see where this one goes, but curious, was Tina actually on the show before this or is she a brand new character? Cons: The Dinah/Hart/Roger storyline is pretty stale now. I need something new. Lucy and Alan-Michael are barely on since Brent left, which is sad. You spend an entire year on a storyline that builds their relationship, brings strife and wedges, and now that they’re finally able to be together in love with no obstacles, you never show them? I want to see them happy! Oh and Lucy and Bridget/David haven't had a scene since Marian tried to get 'a room at the boarding house, which is weird because we haven't seen Bridget react to Lucy being alive. I don't even know if Lucy even lives at the boarding house or with AM, but it's sad pretending like Lucy/Bridget/David were never close friends. Reva/Josh, which is hogging airtime, is a serious whiplash. One week Josh loves her, she hates him; the next week, she loves him, he hates her. He’s always lying to Annie, but now he’s marrying her again, the second wedding in 4 months. I’m also very tired of Marah, her angst over everything, and their overwhelming concern over her. As much as I don’t like Buzz, it is funny watching Reva work at the diner, but I’ll never side with Alan so watching him have feelings about Reva/Buzz or Reva/Josh does nothing for me. Finally, the other small B storylines are only on like once a week which isn’t enough:  Gilly/Griffin/Viviane, Michelle/J, Blake/Ross/Rick, Rick/Abby, Holly/Fletcher and the baby. Something that just popped up out of the blue is David Grant leaving Springfield out of nowhere. He professed his love to Bridget, who turned him down, so he decides to leave when Griffin gives him a job opportunity. Sadly, another character written out for many new characters being introduced. Makes me wonder who is making these calls - the producers, the network, the writers, the fans?
    • OH. The AMC/OLTL Crossover with helicopter, down in the woods, 2 very pregnant, both give birth, only one baby lives. We are on the same page!!!
    • Backtracking because BTG has been distracting me from keeping up with GH. Why is Carly always involved with a paternity lie? Lulu is Dante's (wife? if Im correct) so she has the right to tell him about his son. If anything, she's in a better place to reveal paternity drama than Robin was. As for Robin...I'm conflicted about whether it was HER place to tell AJ he was Michael's dad. Being with a man who's pretending to be someone else's baby daddy is wild. Dante was snoring blaming everyone  but Rocco, however he was right about Jason. A convo isn't enough, neither is trying to be your son's friend. Adolescents need a disciplinarian. At least Lulu made Rocco and Danny scrub the house. 
    • May 2025: Stephanie Sloane interviews Kirsten Storms about all of Maxie's romances in the past 20 years: https://www.swooon.com/gallery/general-hospital-maxie-romances-spinelli-johnny-nathan-kirsten-storms/
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy