Jump to content

Aisha Tyler "Sworn to Secrecy" About When/Where Her Show Will Air


Recommended Posts

  • Members

On the heels of Daytime Confidential saying her talk show pilot is being shot this Thursday and Friday, I found this article from last week (If they pick her show up, I think it's safe to say OLTL is toast):

TCA: Aisha Tyler Mum on Disney Talk Show...for Fear of FX’s ‘Satans and Motorcyles’August 7, 2009

Aisha Tyler is “relatively sworn to secrecy” about the ABC Media Productions talk show project she is developing, she said in response to a critic’s question during the panel at the Television Critics Association press tour Aug. 7 for upcoming FX animated comedy Archer, in which she voices the sexy love-interest Lana Kane. (Click here for complete TCA coverage.)

Tyler said, “we are shooting in a few weeks,” but when a critic pressed her further to reveal when and where the show might air, she said “already you strayed into assassination territory.”

Considering that she was appearing to promote the FX show, which she calls “radical” in how far animation allows for the scripted medium to be pushed, she practically begged the critics to stop asking her about the Disney project–for her own safety.

The panel for Archer followed an executive Q&A session with John Landgraf, president and GM of FX Networks, in which the network topper addressed the violence in FX programming. Landgraf noted that part of the appeal of Sons of Anarchy in particular is a sense of “tourism” for viewers, who would never otherwise have a view into such a truly violent world. Tyler riffed on that.

“FX is back there and the people from Satans and Motorcycles or whatever are going to hit me in my head,” she said. “The Devils of Motorbikes. They’re going to kill me.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Well, I care, because it seems clear to me that OLTL will be canceled to air her show. ABC has already said it was planned for syndication or cable, so the idea that she's "sworn to secrecy" tells me it really is, as has been rumored, for ABC Daytime.

In fact, I doubt OLTL ever makes it to HD. AMC will go HD in February, but all Frons has said is that the move for OLTL will "enable it to" go HD, but no date for the switchover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lol.

Yeah...I am :(

Between Frons's comments about change being good in daytime, and it being a good idea to break up the soap block with talk shows or game shows....Aisha Tyler being sworn to secrecy about when/where her show might air.....and DC's insiders (who were right about AMC's LA move) saying OLTL is going to be canceled in 2010.....well...yeah....I'm concerned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's what I'm hoping.

The other theory is that her show will replace one of the ABC soaps or at least condense two of them.

Or, the show will go into syndication in 2011 and fill Oprah's spot in most markets. Though, it's a little early to be taping a pilot for that launch date.

What I don't get is how the peeps at Daytime Confidential were reporting that her show was not testing well in focus groups and that's why an ABC soap was spared cancellation. But her show is just starting to tape its pilot today and tomorrow. This is intel from Aisha's website.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Oprah's cushy pimpslot is owned by CBS/Paramount Domestic Syndication, formerly King World. I assume ABC O&O's would like to have an ABC/Disney property in that slot, but I'm willing to bet she, along with CBS/Paramount, will offer an option too juicy for them to pass up once she retires.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Then why would ABC waste time and energy on moving both shows? Why not cancel OLTL right off and then move AMC out west right then? Or vice versa? Do you think they're waiting to see how Deal performs in GL's old timeslot?

I believe that IF Aisha replaces one of the two ABC shows, the other will end up as a SOAPnet Original four nights a week or something along those lines, with a pared down cast and lots of fanfare.

OLTL seems to be a favorite of Frons, but there's no way ABC is just gonna drop the ball on AMC.

Also...

Has anyone ever thought that the show Aisha may be replacing is The View? I know The View gets great ratings, but I am sure the likes of Joy Behar, Elizabeth Hasselbeck, and Barbara Walters, along with Whoopi, cannot be cheap. Especially for a live broadcast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ABC wanted to move AMC to save money. So that was going to happen no matter what. The fact that AMC got the move and not OLTL speaks volumes about which show ABC values more. They couldn't cancel OLTL right now, because Aisha's show (or any other possible replacement) isn't ready yet.

Frons is LA-based. If he loved OLTL so much, I'd think he would want that show closer to him than AMC.

And no way would ABC replace The View. It's their highest rated show, and even highest-rated in 18-49 many weeks. Despite the salaries of the women on the show, it's much cheaper to produce than a soap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They probably don't want to get the soap fans hepped up. But that's not the issue, in the end; the issue is that most new talk shows fail or never make it off the ground. Aisha's has flopped in the test/pilot phase at least once or twice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy