Jump to content

Scott Hamner Says Y&R Is NOT Doing A Gay Story


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 164
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Ok... I tried to get the SOW where Hamner's quotes are, and I can't find it. I saw the Aug. 25 issue, it has JT and snoreboria on the cover. Which issue is this interview in? I need to see the magazine for myself so I can make a judgement as to whether these people are really jerking us around, or people who hate the show right now are reading things into quotes that aren't there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sigh. This show. Is a hot tranny mess that has managed to outstrip the dysfunction on these here Y&R threads. Congratulations, everybody.

I swear, I don't think I have even seen GH's IIC backtrack so fast and so horribly. They were always the "gold standard" in Daytime as far as this sort of manipulation, spin and hack writing was concerned. But this makes Lucas's blink-and-you'll-miss-it coming-out and subsequent removal from the canvas appear positively Oscar-worthy (in fact, I think that GH coming-out scene won some national GLBT association award for daytime or summink. LOL. Money talks?).

At first I wondered what all the fuss was about, given that it was obvious that NuAdam=Da EVUL and he was never going to be seen carving "Adam *hearts* Rafe" on the front lawn oak. However, Vee's post about "hot" Chris Engen and Yani Gellman bringing in the "ovulating" fangurls made me realise -- yeah, a CE/YG kiss would have been totally hot to see. Y&R probably would have "gone there" if CE had kept shtum.

MAB and HSx2 need to go. But I am worried that if they are replaced, EVERYBODY on staff will be replaced. The way Lynn Marie Troll cleaned house once she became EP. I'm talking the valued Natalie Minardi Slaters, the Beth Millsteins, Tom Casiellos, Noel Maxims, all those guys who break it down and sweat it out to try and produce something viable to air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They are here now. How are they contributing to making this show better?

Obviously, this kind of showed they aren't really needed.

Or, better, we need to set a criterion on who stays and who goes. This gargantuan, Byzantine writing team is a beast from Hell in itself. It doesn't work. It sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A.) Noel Maxam sold out ages ago when he opted to stay with Days instead of leaving when his mentor, Ed Scott left. He doesn't have anything to do with Y&R now.

B.) And we don't know that for SURE. A strong EP/writer will always keep the team players and the stronger links as they forge ahead. And I'm not impressed with the cliche, day-to-day dialogue of Y&R anyway.

It could get worse than what we have, but I'm willing to take the chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My bad. I knew I'd been seeing his directing credited somewhere on Daytime.

And I'm not Bellcurve but based on Millstein's interim Days work (and her contribution to Sunset Beach -- she made the final week's episodes stand out), I liked the coherency and clarity she gave to the show. And the balance. JER, God rest his soul, had written Days into an almightly tangle by then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What you say is clearly true. The show is, now, circling the drain.

But even in that, many of us find much of merit in individual episodes, performances, stories, scenes. I realize this does not make for a good show, but I'm saying the bones of Y&R, cast and crew, still are decent.

I would very much hope that if there were regime change, the new leaders would use the approach that MAB herself did...don't throw everyone away...evaluate what is working on a person-by-person basis.

That said, some of MAB's choices confused me. Like, why did she so quickly ditch Thom Racina?

If I accept your premise that the writing team is Byzantine (and I sort of do...because SOMETHING IS NOT WORKING....all those people, but none of them seems sufficiently empowered to stop the sh!t from continuing to flow from uphill) and huge, I would hope that under regime change the new people would "cherry pick" the best of the current bunch, and not just replace them all.

That said, I'm very disappointed in Natalie Minardi Slater. She was present when MAB/JG forgot TGVN's two previous vasectomies. That is appalling. How could she not have spoken up and prevented that travesty?? It really says terrible things about the power dynamics among the writers on that show...that they are either afraid to speak up...or that if they speak up they are ignored.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The crème of Y&R's writing staff refused to work for Lynn Latham first and then for Maria. Turns out: they did the right thing. Nothing on this team works (for me). I wouldn't keep a single person. Not a single one.

I want to know that, too.

OK, here's the thing: forget history. The constant clamoring for history and historic references and obscure characters who someone remembered from year 1974 will do nothing for this show. You only believe it would, but it wouldn't. The dictatorship and unrelenting exercising of the power this history has ruined all these shows. They are history's hostages.

Whereas other TV subgroups, like primetime, evolved, this one has deteriorated and instead of turning into a butterfly or a frog it turned back into a larva or frogspawn.

It only brings them doom because people fear it, it looms above them like an ancient malefic prophecy. Turns out: the curse fulfills itself. Or like a cloud of poisonous gas which ends up killing everyone eventually.

I'd rather see natural, flowing, realistic, appropriate dialogue than this travesty of writing I'm seeing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I could agree with you here...except for the vasectomy.

Let's say there is a story where a character loses a leg. Then, suddenly, he appears with two legs. (Oops! DOOL did that!). It damages the story to suddenly "forget" the lost leg.

Forgetting "history" in some broad sense could work (you know I differ somewhat on that, but could agree). But forgetting that a character lost an organ (or procreational ability) is quite different, don' t you think?

At the very least, in choosing to reverse TGVN's infertility, it would not at ALL have hurt anything to throw in one or two sentences right at the time of Sabrina's pregnancy, in which Victor said "I'm so glad I had my vasectomy reversed when I was out of town last year".

Same on DOOL. Couldn't Phillip just have said, "Yes, this new prosthesis is amazingly lifelike!". (LOL).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • Andrew sure has hard nips.
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy