Jump to content

AMC: Daytime Confidential confirming production moving to LA


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Someone made a good point, OLTL is getting the stability and AMC is getting the unstability with this move, potentially losing actors and viewers in the process. AMC is the one they're messing with, not OLTL.

That's why IMO AMC will be cancelled before OLTL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 502
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'll have more to say about this topic later. However, I just wanted to quickly add that a network did indeed cancel a soap that was not its lowest rated: NBC cancelled AW before SuBe despite the fact that AW had nearly one million more viewers. This was one of the many reasons why AW fans were so furious at NBC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But AW also had the bigger pricetag of the two. And the better timeslot.

IMO, the strategy made perfect sense. The problem with the strategy is that NBC didn't expect for their pubescent auds to grow out of that kind of storytelling and expected them to stick around, crappy production values and all.

I don't ever think that NBC was wrong in canning AW. It had clearly run its course. A second wind would have given it more time, but given the way GL was treated post-Conboy, I am so scared AW would have faced similar challenges.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

AMC doesn't currently broadcast in HD. You said you got an HD set... but do you have an HD tuner box (meaning, if you happen to have Satellite or Cable)? If you're watching through a box that isn't an HD one, what you're viewing is in Standard Definition.

(I know, a bit off-subject... but figured it was helpful information!) :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

True, but as I said before, the difference between AMC and OLTL in the only demo that matters, women 18-49, is negligible at this point. They are usually within 0.1 of each other in that category, and therefore likely charge exactly the same amount for ads. And with AMC relocating to cheaper ABC-owned digs in L.A.....and without the expense of expensive union workers striking sets and trucking them across town for storage every night, just to put them back up the next day (a cost OLTL will still endure by staying in NY)....well, I think it's a no-brainer OLTL will go first....UNLESS, as I said, OLTL is able to consistently beat AMC for awhile by at least 0.4 in the women 18-49 demo...maybe even 0.3, to be optimistic about OLTL's chances...but any less (0.1-0.2) means they're pretty much on par, and charging the same amount for ads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So funny... Says they've been "working hard" to "bring the show BACK." I like Garcetti, but what he said was likely total bull - especially since he mistakenly (BIGTIME mistakenly) thought the show was previously here in LA.

I'm sure, as far as the LA City Council goes, AMC's move to LA is totally serendipitous for them - and not anything they were "working hard" to do. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was just thinking that probably many AMC castmembers thought the show was about to be canceled yesterday.

I mean....Brian Frons flies in from Los Angeles and calls a meeting on the set for the whole cast...oy...I bet some of them were thinking maybe that was the end of the line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I do think they've been working hard to bring production back to LA Proper, where Glassell Park is located. Los Angeles county is huge, but places like Hollywood (where GH is filmed) are not part of LA City Proper; instead, they're part of LA County, so the city itself doesn't benefit.

In that sense, this is sort of a coup for them, bringing some TV production back to the city itself....but yeah, I don't think they've been targeting AMC or anything, lol....let alone for this victorious "return" Garcetti seems to have imagined. :rolleyes:

ETA: BTW, I just discovered the coolest thing...if you go to your "My Settings," you can set it so up to 40 posts appear per page in each topic. I just shortened this topic (on my 'puter) from 16 pages to 9 pages. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
    • Sally Spencer was a decent actress, but the writing destroyed the "M.J." that Kathleen Layman had built. Layman had a quiet strength about her, and she and Osburn really felt like sisters. Spencer's character should have been either an unmentioned sister, or maybe Jake's that grew up close to Kathleen, M.J. and the rest, but was away for a few years before joining the force. Kristen Marie was o.k., but I always got a mousier vibe from her. Being pigeon-holed with Scott for most of the run hurt things for her, as well.  The Loves were also underserved between Rhonda Lewin and Philece Sampler. Philece would have been better as Nicole. Thank goodness Anne Heche  showed up for the next round of auditions. Christopher Holder was mediocre as Peter, but given a shot, I think Marcus Smythe could have stuck around for a while.  I would have had Peggy Lazarus be a Frame -- possibly an ex-wife for Vince with an agenda. Smythe and Hollen had  a fun chemistry that could have kept the two around.. Bringing recasts for  Cheryl and Ben back mixing it up with other Frames. Corys, Lawrences at the time might have kept all the families stronger. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy