Jump to content

Y&R: Episodes discussion., Week of July 6


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 351
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Yep, his acting totally killed scenes that could have been much more powerful with a capable actor in Monday's US episode. Tricia Cast and Jess Walton tried their best, but Bierdz is the center piece of this storyline, and he CANNOT deliver or at least he didn't in Monday's US episode. He's totally out of tune in these scenes, it's almost as if his head is stuck on another universe. He has the same facial expression throughout the entire episode, and as y&r_fan said, he sounds like he's dead. His line delivery totally SUCKS. If he's supposed to play arrogant, fine, but even at that, he sucks. This is who people wanted back? Not only does the storyline not make any sense, but the actor at the heart of it sucks and can't sell it.

He's a horrible actor and if he doesn't improve, his six month contract and this poorly written storyline can't end soon enough...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Webmaster

Thank you. It was annoying the hell out of me when I didn't see a new thread. Usually by mid-afternoon Sunday a new one goes up. Let's hope you all find this weeks Y&R as riveting as you've found it in the last couple of weeks. Now if we could just get the other soaps to wake their asses up, I'd be the happiest camper on the SON!

SoapZone has the Zoo...SoapOperaNetwork has the SON :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the big test this week is to try to make viewers care. At the moment I think there's a struggle for emotional investment in most of the stories. Like the Adam story. I end up just waiting for the next moment of shock value. I'm not sure how I should feel with Phillip's return because I'm not sure if they have a strong story planned out beyond just bringing him back. I don't think they did for unrelating Katherine and Jill, or Billy and Mac.

At least we'll be in for some great acting. And hopefully they will do a good job explaining Phillip's motivations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't wait. Monday should be great. From reviews, it's obvious that Thom is playing detatched and aloof at first, keeping Phillips attitudes and motivations an enigma until the right moment for him to open up. Either that or he's rusty. I'll watch very closely and judge. I've seen alot of actors who use their eyes alot, and not gesture or facial expression called "wooden" and so forth, Ashbash was one. But I like that type of actor, some viewers just have to be beaten over the head with emoting in order to "get it", but I don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I saw a scene from Tuesday and his voice does sound odd and his speech was kinda slurred like he had no teeth. Reminds me of Tiny from the Tiny and Toya Show. His body language and everything about his performance in such a pivital scene fell flat. I worry that the terrible excuse for Phillip leaving them coupled with Thom's acting will ruin this storyline. I was excited about his return until I read that awful spoiler, but now that I see his acting I'm worried. He was never a great actor, but as a young actor he showed potential. As I said in another thread, he's more on the level of someone like Eva Marcielle who does have great charisma and has potential. He's not one of those fresh out of the gate stars like early Greg Rikaart, Tricia Cast, Heather Tom, etc. It seems whatever talent he had got lost. It'll be interesting to see if he improves over time.

This is a make or break it week for me on Y&R. My favorite part of MAB's Y&R has been the Chancellor storylines, but with weak writing for Jill and this silly Phillip twist my saving grace could be ruined. We'll see if they can pull this off. I'm doubting it, but we'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've also appreciated the focus on the Chancellors, although I sometimes question whether the writing is true to the characters. I haven't seen what I know of as Jill, or Katherine, or their relationship, which wasn't as noticeable when they were moving through story at a fast clip, but has bothered me for some months now. They haven't been written for in such a long time that it was probably easy for MAB to graft stories onto them. I hope when they move more into the story with Phillip, we will get to see more sides to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy