Jump to content

Y&R- #7 in Internet Streaming


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Through plays on ABC.com, "Lost" accounted for 36.4 million total video streams -- a tally that includes views of full-length episodes, clips and video podcasts related to the show. "Grey's Anatomy" was No. 2 with 29 million streams. Compared to the same stats from March, "Lost" was up 13% while "Grey's" climbed 57%. ABC noted that "Lost" has been the top dog among vid streams for five consecutive months.

Rounding out May's top five were ABC's "Desperate Housewives" (14.9 million streams); NBC's "The Office" (14.5 million); and ABC's "Dancing With the Stars" (13.1 million). CBS' "NCIS" was No. 6 with 11.6 million streams, followed by the Eye's daytime soap "The Young and the Restless" (11.5 million) and "Survivor" (11.1 million). ABC's "The Bachelorette" was No. 9 with 9.1 million. "Gossip Girl" rounded out the top 10 with 8.4 million.

http://www.variety.com/article/VR111800494...d=1009&cs=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

WOW!

No, it is hard to make a lot of sense of that streams number...but if we average it over approximately 20+ episodes a month, and PRETEND that it means "unique users watching at least some of the show" (that's a bit of a stretch, but lets pretend), that means we can add about 500,000/night to the show's total US viewership.

That number isn't far off from the Soapnet tally.

So, combining those two sources, we're seeing a 20% increase in Y&R's viewership over the CBS tally each day.

The trick, of course, is to make that extra million nightly on-line and Soapnet viewers generate as much income, per viewer, as the TV broadcast. Hopefully, that is close.

Thank you so much for sharing it. The Y&R numbers are good, but not nearly as impressive as, say, Lost. Why? Because (during the season) Lost gets those eyeballs with ONE episode/week, but Y&R needs five times as many shows to generate a smaller number of eyeballs. Still, I'm happy to see signs of life in the old girl...especially in the new media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If you figure in the Soapnet and streaming numbers, as a reflection of a total US viewers, Y&R is actually back up to where it was YEARS ago.

If you estimate that Y&R total daily views is approximately 6 million with these figures, that maps onto the ratings that the broadcast-only got about a decade ago, right?

So many variables here. If Y&R has held onto substantial viewership by moving into new media, in the face of a broadcast industry and a daytime genre that are in general decline, it says there is genuine hope -- contingent on monetizing these alternative viewers -- for viability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What is the most impressive is that Y&R is CBS' SECOND MOST STREAMED SHOW!

For a show belonging to a so-called dying genre this is great news. And now we know why CBS.com is actively featuring Y&R in it's streaming links on the front page.

This survey also shows that viewers of serialized drama are more prone to try online streaming than those of procedurals which on the other hand do much better with network repeats. This still means for ad dollars for the networks but maybe online streaming will close in?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Wow that's pretty awesome for Y&R.

Yup. As network ratings continue to drop, other venues will increase. People still want to watch soaps, but they find easier ways to watch soaps. I pretty much watch all my soaps/tv shows online now.

For Canadians, CTV.ca just started streaming B&B. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And that raises the other point, one that came up in the ratings thread.

If you figure Y&R is getting at least 6 million views a day (all sources) in the US, and B&B is doing well on-screen and online, we already have signs of strength. Add to that the international distribution dollars (which seem to be strongest for these two soaps), and we really have the only two soaps CLEARLY positioned to survive in this dreadful market. That doesn't make them invulnerable, and that doesn't mean the attrition won't kill them...but it does mean that by being proactive with different forms of US distribution and international distribution, they have carefully worked not to put all their eggs in one basket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation.  I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
    • Only thing I enjoyed was Abby / Olivia, etc., and the addiction storyline. Otherwise, I could do without the season.
    • Right? Vanessa had a ball gown for every occasion.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy