Jump to content

B&B: Week of May 25, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Stephanie was always jealous of Kristen. Even if they made up during Kristin's last stint, Stephanie never truly forgets.

Kristen's probably smart enough to stay out of the drama, living happily with her PSA husband and PSA son who no longer exist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

PSA :lol:

Am I sick? I actually enjoyed today's episode...

Nick vs Owen

Nick and Jackie

Bill and Stephanie

Stephanie and Ridge (even if this the 105th time they've rung around this rosie of a storyline)

Infinitely more interesting than "Sick". I could do without the next round of Brooke-Ridge drama...but there it is.

I prefer the use of the rooftop as "Il Giardino", and they should leave it that way. Forget about the Forrester exercise space or the flowing-drapes-spa that Stephy and Marcus almost had sex in.

I don't really get the point of going outside (is it cheaper than erecting sets?), but otherwise it seems nice. It's got to be AWFULLY hot to tape out there for many months of the year. I wonder if they can quickly change plans if they encounter a rare rainy day? Today was really windy out there, and I wondered why the microphones did not pick up wind noise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's either a Babs Bloom idea because all shows suddenly went outside (well except for Y&R which does it sporadically) or it's Brad Bell catering to the international audience to bring back the real LA feel. Back in the golden days of the 90s the show was basically on location each single week...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

:lol:

I can't wait to see this. B&B is not typically a show that makes continuity errors. Sure, they IGNORE things or REWRITE things...but they don't usually forget "first marriages".

Ridge was not Taylor's first hubby (that was Blake), and Taylor was not Ridge's first wife (that was Caroline).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh that's right. The controlling, abusive husband whose name she still reverts to every time she's divorced from Ridge instead of going back to her maiden name Hamilton (which incidentally was Ashford when she first showed up, but that's a different story). :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation.  I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
    • Only thing I enjoyed was Abby / Olivia, etc., and the addiction storyline. Otherwise, I could do without the season.
    • Right? Vanessa had a ball gown for every occasion.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy