Jump to content

Y&R: Week of May 11, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I see your points Mark. I don't think your theory is that "out there". On top of all the pressure from Nina and his family Phillip would have had to deal with tabloids, since his family is famous. In the soap world I don't think it's that much of a stretch that he would just choose to start a new life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Did I really say that about Mary Jane? Oh well...it is true. Both the fact that I'd tolerate her as Patty, and the fact that I'm a fanboi. That is not true about almost any other thing in my life (I'm not obsessive)...but Y&R...it is true.

I agree. I'm wondering if the "casual recurring" story we are hearing is a cover story. They couldn't say 'Nina is back and heavy in story', because they didn't want to tip their hands?

That this fixes LML's mistakes is one thing. But it also monkeys will a major Bill Bell plot point. That makes this one more interesting. Riskier, but possibly more rewarding. I never liked that P3 died, even though it produced great drama.

It is funny, with Olivia. I can't say I was ever a fan. I HATED her when she slept with Brad. But I have been happy to have her back, and would like to see her heavier in story.

I guess, when GL leaves CBS, Y&R can just expand to two hours :).

I agree. I honestly thought that call was a LML dropped plot...and I could live with it as 'forgotten' (much as TLW says they have 'forgotten' Olivia's sleeping with Brad while Ashley was dying of cancer). So, it is clever and innovative that they will pursue this. And it is bonafide shocking -- in a good way -- that they'll tie it to P3.

It's the P3-back-from-the-dead angle that has me very interested, and a little worried.

I wish I could remember! My MEMORY is that he died in that car crash and we didn't see the body. But several people have said we saw him died bedside.

Does ANYONE remember? Did ANYONE see it? Any Youtube links?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Witch here: it has already begun... Another emanation of the Y&R syndrome. :lol: A “controversial” story that hasn’t even began properly, people are already trying to make it work, to rationalise, to devise a way this story to work for them...

It should be fun.

AMELIA.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think if any soap is going to explain this wonderfully, it's Y&R. Plus the show is so good right now that I don't think I'll even care if the explanation sucks, as long as the actual story is good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agreed. I think MAB and Co. have excelled in their execution far above any other soap we've seen in the last several years. true, that there have been some missteps, but every show, primetime or daytime, has had those at some point. On the whole, it really has been very nicely laid out. Even stories that on paper has ended up being rather enjoyable. The only exception to that is the Winters storyline, but considering the story is surrounding that cold fish Neil, I can almost see how there could be problems.

Sylph, I love ya, but what is wrong with seeing a story play out before outright condemning it? We fans, on some level, share some responsibility for daytime's dire predicament simply because we never see a story through without becoming enraged. I've done that too. I think MAB and Co.'s tenure has so far exceeded my expectations and, therefore, has earned at least some leeway with me. Sure that is contingent on the quality of the storyline, but we will cross that bring if/when we get to it. Otherwise, why not speculate. Isn't that what we are here for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    •  Yeah, he is still dressed like Martin. He looks great, though.  Cute picture. Sober up, cause we need the tea.
    • Well, Claire did rig Rick's test results, but it was to flunk. They actually managed to get his correct results back after they were thrown into Cedar's furnace...I think? Everyone knew Claire changed them and Rick passed so that rewrite never made sense.   I agree. Pratt always seems "edgy" on screen (and her Locker Room interview prooved that it came from her personality.) I liked Claire causeing trouble and love Meta ringing her beads. Its just too bad that Abby left and they kinda just forgot Claire existed. 
    • Oh so they did sleep together. The retcon was just the medical boards? That makes sense. I think Susan Pratt, while a good actress, was just an unlikeable presence onscreen and soaps wrote to that most of the time. There was some potential for more with her when she returned in that stint, as Pratt was at least interesting to watch and caused some conflict for the stifled Bauers. Instead of pairing her with Alan and then disappearing I might have had her hook up with Danny. I think there was a lot of flirtation with Bolger's Philip, but they never crossed the line.
    • I haven't seen Melchior in the role, but it would be astounding if she's worse than Linn. Her rivalry with Stephanie was sidelined IMO because Linn was one of the few actors who didn't have chemistry with, nor raise her game, when paired with Susan Flannery. To be fair, she did show some signs of life in scenes opposite Darlene Connelly, but way too little too late. It feels like Bell finally woke up after the Thorne switchover and sidelined the Kristin character with Mick to 1 or 2 appearances a week. As a result, the show improved by leaps and bounds after she was inexplicably at the center of the show for most of 1989. Margo is so much more enjoyable when not tied to that albatross. Even Clarke is watchable with less Kristin interaction. She can't exit stage left soon enough. As for the new Thorne, I agree that Norcross feels like a Forrester a lot more than Thrachta, even if the latter is a better actor.
    • The cast said that scenes were filmed over a few weeks, with a preplanned hiatus in the middle, and it was all out of order.  I would *guess* that they used Chandler when they could get him? They also had to work around Leo Howard getting married around the time these episodes were filmed, but I guess they worked it out since Tate appeared.
    • Maybe there was a scheduling conflict or something. He still has the full time 9-5 in Atlanta, right? Julie was there. Idk if Maggie’s gonna be a part of it though 
    • At this point, the best nonpaywall coverage of Los Angeles (and anything political)  is in...the Tennessee Holler https://bsky.app/profile/thetnholler.bsky.social And as always, emptywheel continues to be consistent https://bsky.app/profile/emptywheel.bsky.social
    • Today Monday was the start of people arriving at the funeral, but the service hasn't started yet.  I know this is the nonspoiler thread but I think it's okay to say (in nonspecific terms) that the funeral episodes span a few days.  I won't detail it more here. Just sayin' keep watching.
    • Why am I only now hearing about what happened in L.A., lol?
    • While I agree that Reeves is Jennifer, I honestly do prefer Cady McClain in the role, as I feel she had/has a wider range of acting capabilities than I feel Reeves has. It's the strength of an actor, ultimately, for me, regardless of how I feel about Reeves' political/social views (which I widely disagree with). Plus, not to mention, they costumed Reeves like an old-fashioned frumpy farm/Moron wife, while McClain had some fashion-forward moments.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy