Jump to content

Y&R: Week of May 11, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I am mostly okay with it, but I can't help but feel that occasionally they write whatever falls into their laps.

But it's just so weird... how crazy was it to push various new stories all at the same time? It's almost as if a new writer came and took over. Is it always going to be like this way when certain storylines wrap up?

And yes, as soon as I've heard it I didn't like Daniel's storyline. BIG mistake on that one. They've been collecting those too...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I love your breakdown but here's what's wrong with it. Alot of these impulses are out of nowhere. At least justify certain things to the viewer. Why mke these decisons, the viewer still wants to understand. Even at times when the viewer see the character do it over and over again, the viewer wants to be reminded sometimes. They are doing pretty good with the characters Phyllis, Nick, Sharon and Jack's story they are managing to keep them all in character. I only have a problem with the Noah aspect of the story, he's extremely under-developed.

Adam- Does he have a heart anymore is he human? I will summize the character hurt or has been hurt but they are not writing to that, even in his scenes where he complains it's being undermined somehow by the deviousness of his ways and how calculating they have made him (that alone is plot driven). This story is either genius or wrong on so many levels.

I already wrote aout my problem with Daniel's story. Ashley's preganancy is completly plot driven. Plots aren't bad, when they make sense and are correctly executed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Good points. Like I said, I still like the show. Alot.

I will take exception with your synopsis on Sharon's mental state, however. There has been nothing on-screen to show us that she is still having problems. One day she mentioned "therapy", the klepto charges were dropped, she got knocked-up and no hint of what's going on in her mind. At least on the scale that was driving her story the last few weeks. If she were still having issues, wouldn't we see her still swiping [!@#$%^&*] off random pieces of furniture? All that stopped when lil junior started growing in her. TPTB put alot of emphasis on that aspect of her mental health before she was preggers. Why stop now?

I should know about poorly written shows - just look at which one I based my screen name on. :rolleyes::rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Okay, so let's say we were a focus group, and we were sitting in front of the writers (or our report were to go to them).

What advice would we give them to "justify the impulses". I see your point...and I definitely agree about Noah. But what, concretely, would they do differently to move from a "B" grade to an "A" grade?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not saying it's bad to discuss those things, even though, I have to admit, I sometimes hate it how certain topics keep repeating themselves (those dream casting decisions, the rationalisations etc.). I'm just acknowledging it, kind of. Saying it's there. :D

That is because I watch and I can just sense it when things will start to fall apart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So you actually believe Nikki went over there wanting to beg Victor to take her back? :rolleyes:

I've seen NOTHING of Paul's point of view on this show, and I haven't seen it for a good 7 years.

Yes, Nina's 2 minute scene with Katherine was sooo revealing. :rolleyes:

But I thought Amber had progessed as a character and grown up?

The whole overall story is plot-driven, and Daniel isn't stupid enough to take the justification the FBI agent gave him from the START.

And do we know what his motivation is for harming Ashley of all people? If it's to get back at both Victor and Jack, we've seen no evidence of this as of yet.

Heather is far from a defined character. Another ill-developed character (that happens to be a legacy character anyway) from the Latham era that MAB doesn't care to develop.

Because Sharon needed a predictable pregnancy to show it all?

I've yet to see from Jack's point of view why he loves Sharon and continues to make hiself look stupid to run to her rescue.

Yeah, once this storyline is going on Phyllis is insecure about Sharon

Nick has no personality at all, so I'm not even going there.

Now tell me how character driven are these whose the daddy, new face but old character, and gaslighting with no clear action for hurting the victim "character-driven?"

I see no reason for MOST characters on this show acting the way they do at the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I miss the good old days when one s/l or a few that were tied together would culminate with a bang while a couple more were building up, all the the same time.

Boy oh boy. When was the last time someone paced a show that masterfully?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They're just milking her mental illness for now, her always acting on her impulses I think is a nod to that. She's unstable, so to speak so for plot purposes the character will continue to think of the wrong things as remedies i.e. MEN. I understand that aspect of the story for that character, but many other things confuse me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL. Love your avatar, by the way.

Yes, I think they could be more explicit about Sharon. My read, though, is that she is "under-treated"...and so she remains vulnerable for future stories.

I also feel that we have already been told Sharon's klepto runs in stages after extreme guilt. One time was when she blamed herself for Doris' crash. Another time was when Brad died.

That means they "resolve" (this is true of most mental illnesses", and reappear periodically.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I feel with that as well. BUT: then on some occasions they just write the most classic Y&R moments. You think they are done with a certain story and suddenly some time later it's back for one or two episodes which bring closure. (Right now I can't give a good example, although there several, except for the Glo/ash showdown in court last week.) No other show has done sth. like that in years (if ever) and it used to be a Y&R staple. This is when I'm easily back in heaven with MAB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • “Gender is who you are, and sexuality is who you want.” — C.N. Lester, “Trans Like Me: A Journey for All of Us” St. Pete bridge lit for Pride

      Please register in order to view this content

    • In case it is of interest to anyone here, I have digital copies (computer files, mp4 etc.) of all of the episodes. And, besides having the files they are all up on my usual video hosting site, acct name: shallotpeel, channel it is in: Primetime Soaps and file names like  Flamingo Road S1E15 Hurricane Flamingo Road was a primetime soap on NBC by Lorimar Productions. 2 seasons. 1980-1982. Morgan Fairchild, Barbara Rush. Developed by Rita Lakin.   
    • Arguably DAYS OF OUR LIVES has been brilliant lately & definitely was last week. But, here I am with nitpick & technicalities. This was the only misstep but it was just a stupid thing that should have been caught. Deidre Hall as Marlena has this one problematic line, "It didn't matter how many identities you had, I always knew exactly who you were, you were the man who saved my life." - Marlena, DAYS, 6-2-25 Unfortunately the flashback closest to it was when Marlena was on the phone, terrified because she thought he was Stefano. Yes, it's true that the line is not accurate. There were many times when she did not feel the way she is claiming because of whatever was going on in story with his 'retconned to hell & back' identity & origin story. Does it keep the whole week from being called excellent? Nope.  
    • The Vault has been down all night.
    • Notable: Glendale is not exactly a progressive enclave.

      Please register in order to view this content

      Newsom is a craven opportunist, but his comments today were exactly how better people need to handle Trump.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I decided this primetime soap deserved it's own thread as the Primetime soaps thread is very cluttered and why shouldn't NBC's Lorimar soap mot have a chance to shine? In doing a deeper dive into the second season ratings I was surprised to see that FR actually had an uptick in the ratings when NBC moved it to 9pm Tuesdays beginning March 82. I'd always assumed this move was a desperate one as NBC were running short of programming and had given up on the show,deciding to let the final episodes play out and be hammered by 3's Company  and CBS Movie. But the numbers paint a different story. In it's 10pm slot up against Hart to Hart, which regularly finished in the Top 20, FL premiered in 53rd place and placed in the 40's and 50's as the season continued. But come January 82 the numbers surged a little now moving into the 40's hitting #43 in Feb. Hart to Hart was #11 Then in March Bret Maverick was moved to 8pm with FR @9. First week 16th March FR #47 15.1/24 3's Company #3 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #60 Not great but #2 in it's timeslot March 23 FR #44 15.6/25 3's Company #4 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #33 So even with a stronger movie on CBS FR's numbers went up. March 30 FR #31 16.6/26 3's Company #9 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #56 Best rating/position yet Tues April 6 pre empted Tues April 14 FR #36 16.0/26 3's Company #5 Too Close for Comfort #11 CBS Movie #59 Maintaining previous week's numbers Tues April 21 FR #33 15.6/24 3's Company #3 Too Close for Comfort #5 CBS Movie #60 Numbers down a little (reflecting general spring downturn) but best ranking of the season so far Tues April 28 FR #35 15.1/23 3's Company #9 Too Close for Comfort #6 CBS Movie #42 Tues May 4 FR #27 15.2/24 3's Company #5 Too Close for Comfort #4 CBS Movie #41 Season finale and highest position of the season. Looking at those numbers I wonder why NBC cancelled the show? They had very few hits and here was a show that was holding it's own and moving up in the rankings in a tougher timeslot. And being a serial, the storylines could continue to build the following season. And I'm sure the desirable W18-49 demo was good. Some might argue that CBS were shower weaker movies, but even so, soap viewers are pretty loyal. I guess Grant Tinker arrived at NBC and wanted a classier look but there was room for FR on the schedule. I mean, the following season Knight Rider,Powers of Matthew Star and the A Team arrived so there was still room for more populist fare. Flamingo could have stayed at 9pm-the replacement Gavilan bombed (surely FR would have done better} or moved back to 10pm. The following Jan NBC had a hit with A Team Tues 8pm. Had Flamingo followed it, it might have really taken off. As it was they tried Bare Essence, which flopped. Oh well,it was not to be...    
    • Always, in every way, Cass/Wally/Felicia foundational to my viewing. And, I think if we look at the aftermath of the disastrous 90 minute show that we find too many pockets of some kind of lost time at the show plus way too much of change-ups in exec & writing leadership and of course we also reach the first time it becomes notable that NBC wants to get rid of the show so they can put a new soap they own in the timeslot.
    • If the MAGAts were easy prey enough to get manipulated into voting for the tangerine-tinted terror, they'll fall for anything.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • And this came out as the "feud" and the media pushing the protests in Los Angeles got all the media attention. They know the press and the public will not care or can be manipulated into approving.

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy