Jump to content

Y&R: Week of April 27, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Abby saying it makes it even worse. Eden isn't goth and Abby, being a teenage girl, should know that.

Eden, at best, is some kind of hippie-light chick with her Ashram 'love everything in the universe' upbringing.

I guess this month's alloted research time was all used up on googling chipmunks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 717
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Because the best insults are the ones that make no sense.

Calling her a hippie would have made sense. Or, you know, murderer's daughter. But calling her 'goth girl' when she clearly isn't one is the kind of writing that gives soaps a bad name. That entire scene was just badly written from start to finish.

And, obviously, not everyone thought it fit well with the scene or it wouldn't have bugged me. It was a clunker of a line in the middle of a horrible scene that sounded like it was written by someone in middle age that hasn't gone to the mall in a long, long time.

Much the same way it's like fingernails on a chalkboard every time Daniel refers to Kevin as a 'kid'. No guy in his twenties is going to say things like 'he's a good kid' or 'the kid has been through a lot' about someone that's the same age. Guy, yes. Dude, yes. Kid, no.

They should leave all the youth slang to Amanda Beall. It might be hyper-articulate but at least it sounds plausible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If Mary Jane truly is Patty then this is poor planning on MAB's part and IMO her first poorly written story. First of all, it's a waste to have two long term characters in a romance off screen when they have such potential. There's genuine chemistry and story potential with Adam/Heather and then Victor. If Mary Jane were Patty, they should be developing Paul as an important character now. Again, considering the fireworks she's bound to set off...where is Mary Williams? Why aren't they building a family unit with Mary, Paul and Heather? Where is Ricky? It would just be such a waste since she's tied to a core family that they haven't mentioned or shown any interest in for ages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought Eden was a goth girl when I first started watching again. The dark hair, the dark clothing she wore, gloomy personality and the fact that she doesnt smile much unless she's with Noah. To someone who doesnt know her, its easy to see why she'd be called that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Paul and Mary should be built regardless of what happens with Mary Jane. When they brought on Heather they should've had long term plans to integrate her into the cast. Instead she's written like a day player with no friends, no family, no luck and a barely there romance. Hell, forget Mary and just focus on Paul and Heather or Nikki and Paul and you atleast have something.

And I'm not sure how shocking this can be in the long run...how many characters can it be? Patty? Mari Jo? Lindsay? Who else? Diane would just be an insane and illogical choice no matter how it's explained.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

QUOTE (Chris B @ Apr 28 2009, 09:22 PM)
If Mary Jane truly is Patty then this is poor planning on MAB's part and IMO her first poorly written story. First of all, it's a waste to have two long term characters in a romance off screen when they have such potential. There's genuine chemistry and story potential with Adam/Heather and then Victor. If Mary Jane were Patty, they should be developing Paul as an important character now. Again, considering the fireworks she's bound to set off...where is Mary Williams? Why aren't they building a family unit with Mary, Paul and Heather? Where is Ricky? It would just be such a waste since she's tied to a core family that they haven't mentioned or shown any interest in for ages.

I agree. The absence of Mary Williams, meddling in Heather's life, is a HUGE omission. It would even have been worth recasting if the original actress is retired.

And, if they followed our advice (i.e., that Patty = Tawny; I don't care if Andrea Evans plays it or Haiduk plays it or whatever), you'd want Mary in the middle of that.

For a team that has done so nicely with Kay-Murph, and even gave us Doris back (in some fashion), not having Mary in town is really glaring. For me, it is another sign that Doug Davidson is on the "DD" plan (i.e., Don Diamont).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, we commented on that in our home. That collection of "young dayplayers" at CL...confronting Noah...each leaving ample pauses between line readings to ensure that the dialogue doesn't flow remotely naturally...felt like something I have recently seen on the high school stage.

Youth casting and writing is soooooooooo hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The complete collapse of the Williams family is one of the reasons I don't know how much dramatic impact Mary Jane being Patty would have. We'd be left with this stranger playing a woman Jack wronged in 198...4? 1985? Will viewers just shrug? They know Jack's done bad things. Will a new face playing someone he knew decades ago impact them? If Jack were a stronger character, possibly, but he's already taken so many kicks, all we would see is a reminder of his long ago status as a character who did more than smirk at Victor and hold Sharon's hand.

I would rather they make her a woman who has no history on the show. I thought Luan was a wonderful character and a wonderful story, even though her presence was a rewrite.

I hope they will at least bring in Corbin Bernsen or Brett Hadley (is he still alive?), or recast the other long unseen Williams brother (or was there not another one).

Paul is dating a woman who was once one of the most important characters on the show, and he finally has his daughter back, and we see him much less than when his only story was holding Lauren's hand and dating Maggie.

I have fond memories of Paul, but I think they should have written him out and kept Brad. There was still so much story for Brad with Ashley and Abby.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
    • Sally Spencer was a decent actress, but the writing destroyed the "M.J." that Kathleen Layman had built. Layman had a quiet strength about her, and she and Osburn really felt like sisters. Spencer's character should have been either an unmentioned sister, or maybe Jake's that grew up close to Kathleen, M.J. and the rest, but was away for a few years before joining the force. Kristen Marie was o.k., but I always got a mousier vibe from her. Being pigeon-holed with Scott for most of the run hurt things for her, as well.  The Loves were also underserved between Rhonda Lewin and Philece Sampler. Philece would have been better as Nicole. Thank goodness Anne Heche  showed up for the next round of auditions. Christopher Holder was mediocre as Peter, but given a shot, I think Marcus Smythe could have stuck around for a while.  I would have had Peggy Lazarus be a Frame -- possibly an ex-wife for Vince with an agenda. Smythe and Hollen had  a fun chemistry that could have kept the two around.. Bringing recasts for  Cheryl and Ben back mixing it up with other Frames. Corys, Lawrences at the time might have kept all the families stronger. 
    • shoot...he said in that Locher room with Krista. I think he met her before that---she was doing Broadway and they had mutual friends or an agent maybe?
    • Yes. And I assume he met Mary Ellen Stuart at GL.
    • That's an odd coincidence. Yeah, Roger would turn anything he could to his advantage. At the time, he's just taking the pictures to bank leverage over Reva, Billy or the Lewises.  I'm kinda squeamish about 1986 episodes myself. I'd love to hear the original version of Ross/Vanessa/Dinah, but the Cain story is bad, and I don't want Billy and Vanessa to break up.
    • Eeek. I didn't know this either! I will say, though, even though they skimmed over a lot of Roger's past, I will give them props for not trying to turn him into a hero. Yeah, I was hoping we would get more 1986 episodes than were available on YT before, but now I'm wondering if I really want to see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy