Jump to content

ATWT: April discussion


Recommended Posts

  • Members

So, Meg's brilliant plan is to goad Paul (a man who's buried a girl in his backyard, shot a man and been in a psych ward in the past calendar year) into a fit of jealous rage to the point of physical violence???

Who says this show isn't sick??

Other than being happy to see Emma (which I think means we've seen every vet this month...) I have no comment on the reDONKulous Nuke/Z/DamLilden mess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 288
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I am bad! After Wednesday, I want Lily to leave Holden and get back with Damian. I just don't see the chemistry between the new Lily and Holden that Martha Byrne had, but there's plenty of spark with Damian. Holden's self-righteous Snyder-ness is also getting on my nerves. Lily would not be driven to Damian if Holden had been more reasonable to begin with.

Nice to see Lucinda, aware of what's going on with Luke and Noah. I guess she's moved back out to her own place.

Lisa was involved in two different stories, and the scrapbook thing she mentioned with Damian came into play, wow! Hope she gets more airtime in future as well.

Wednesday was, I believe, a Susan Dansby script. It showed both the strength and the weakness of her writing. Her writing for Lisa felt right because she knew history. However, her too-clever-by-half lines also surfaced, with Katie's painful "Isn't there some sort of Hippocratic Oath for hit-and-run ESPs?" a memorable example of such.

Jade's story was not about having sex with Will and then being hated by Will. Her story was and still is a story of wanting to belong somewhere. This is enough "maturity" for me, I don't need more of a twisted revenge motivation (or aftermath of such) than the minor subtext of revenge that there was.

And I do not agree Luke should have never forgiven Jade. Jade was the first person he came out to and although part of it was for her own reasons, she was still extremely supportive in that key, first conversation. And she's family. The two have a strong foundation in common because they both felt like outsiders in their family and wanted to belong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know! But of course, Holden is still making it a blame game. "It's Damian's fault, he gave Luke the money, it's his family the Grimaldis, we're no closer because of Damian, blah blah, Damian, blah blah, Damian, blah blah blah, Damian put your life at risk Lily." Argh! And Holden has the audacity to say he is the only one putting Luke and Noah first.

I liked Luke and Noah's conversation with each other, including the dark humor, as well as Luke's sympathy for Zoe/Gia. And I liked Zac's frantic reaction after he shot Noah too (showing he does have *some* conscience).

It was good to see Emma, but I have no idea why Holden would swear Emma to secrecy over Luke and Noah being kidnapped. The Grimaldi involvement, perhaps, but the fact they were kidnapped should be a secret, why? It is just a lazy way for the show not to have Meg interacting outside her own story. You don't see this on the far more integrated GL.

About Meg's plan, it's definitely sick, and dangerous. Nonethless, I find it strangely watchable.

Friday looks like it will be boring with a capital B! The Parker/Liberty stuff should be okay, but more Dusty and Lucy smuggling for the "FGA", snoooooooze.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OMG

I know I say this about every day...but I'm sick of Craig. So much so, the fact Jack upset a five year old doesn't bother me in the least. Craig deserved that shot, and even more so when he "downgraded" Jack to Parker's "adoptive father", as if Craig ever gave a rat's ass about Hal or his memory.

I feel bad for Carly. No matter which way she turns, she's got someone in her face telling her she's wrong. Craig was a complete pig to her. Jack barely gives her time to explain her situation, no matter how innocent. And Parker manages to throw her past in her face nearly every day.

Sigh....here comes St.Janet playing the "he might hurt my baby, 'cause I got slapped around by losers" card. *eyeroll* Then she bans Parker from the farm?? Nice, considering she doesn't own the place, she's mooched off everyone in the Snyder family since she bopped into town, and Parker's lived there more and longer than she has. What a hypocrite...I wish she'd take her spawn and move into the Lakeview.

It was, however, nice to see Brad, unencumbered by the hideous baby plot, talking to Lib.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree. It's something different and it will get Meg out of Paul's orbit.

Parker is totally losing it...LOL. That was the highlight of the show. I am tired of seeing Craig and anything related to him....Lucy..and Dustball...I just ff their scenes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

re: the spoiler....I don't mind.

I know I'm supposed to be scared of Parker's rages...but all I see is a little boy who's throwing a temper tantrum. It's not a knock on Mick Hazen's acting at all. (I think he handles Parker's anger a lot better than coughsomeonecough I could name.) I think it shows Parker's vulnerability. But TIIC couldn't get him out of the "pouting and angry teen" rut fast enough for my liking.

And KEEP him AWAY from Liberty. That girl is another Gwen. She'll suck all the life out of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Paolo's return isn't working because Jean sucks as HW. Martha B. is also missing in the equation. NO offense to Noelle Beck...she is a fine actress but she is not Lily. Martha B. needs to be lured back to ATWT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was thinking the same thing. I still don't get it. Noelle Beck has been on a lot this year. Yet, they couldn't guarantee Martha it??

Noelle would have made a great Frannie recast. But Passanante and Goutman don't have a clue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not my Frannie. In my mind, Frannie Hughes is a criminologist and profiler, working with the FBI, a la Clarice Sterling, since she'd have more than some experience with criminal minds. Somehow, I can't see glamourpuss Noelle Beck in that capacity.

I'm not even gonna get into that. Goutman was trippin'. He knows it, and his decision to be stubborn has come back to bite him in the a$$. Hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
    • Sally Spencer was a decent actress, but the writing destroyed the "M.J." that Kathleen Layman had built. Layman had a quiet strength about her, and she and Osburn really felt like sisters. Spencer's character should have been either an unmentioned sister, or maybe Jake's that grew up close to Kathleen, M.J. and the rest, but was away for a few years before joining the force. Kristen Marie was o.k., but I always got a mousier vibe from her. Being pigeon-holed with Scott for most of the run hurt things for her, as well.  The Loves were also underserved between Rhonda Lewin and Philece Sampler. Philece would have been better as Nicole. Thank goodness Anne Heche  showed up for the next round of auditions. Christopher Holder was mediocre as Peter, but given a shot, I think Marcus Smythe could have stuck around for a while.  I would have had Peggy Lazarus be a Frame -- possibly an ex-wife for Vince with an agenda. Smythe and Hollen had  a fun chemistry that could have kept the two around.. Bringing recasts for  Cheryl and Ben back mixing it up with other Frames. Corys, Lawrences at the time might have kept all the families stronger. 
    • shoot...he said in that Locher room with Krista. I think he met her before that---she was doing Broadway and they had mutual friends or an agent maybe?
    • Yes. And I assume he met Mary Ellen Stuart at GL.
    • That's an odd coincidence. Yeah, Roger would turn anything he could to his advantage. At the time, he's just taking the pictures to bank leverage over Reva, Billy or the Lewises.  I'm kinda squeamish about 1986 episodes myself. I'd love to hear the original version of Ross/Vanessa/Dinah, but the Cain story is bad, and I don't want Billy and Vanessa to break up.
    • Eeek. I didn't know this either! I will say, though, even though they skimmed over a lot of Roger's past, I will give them props for not trying to turn him into a hero. Yeah, I was hoping we would get more 1986 episodes than were available on YT before, but now I'm wondering if I really want to see that. 
    • That's what Julie Hanan Carruthers is doing for BTG at the new studio in Atlanta, but JHC is credited. And @errol said JHC is working in a nonproduction capacity at Y&R.
    • I remember when the whole Missy Reeves controversy started in 2012.  She tweeted support of a business that had made homophobic statements. Greg Rikaart (who was on Y&R back then) publicly called her out on it, but was willing to reach out and speak with her. Article here: https://greginhollywood.com/greg-rikaart-talks-about-his-twitter-war-with-fellow-soap-star-melissa-reeves-over-anti-gay-chick-fil-a-73139 That being said, ten years later, on DAYS, in 2022, when they had they double wedding of Leo/CraigWesley and Gwen/Xander, Jack and Jennifer came to the wedding.  At that time, Missy Reeves was only intermittently available for DAYS. Jennifer was living "in Boston" and Cady McClain and Missy were each intermittently appearing as Jennifer, on the specific occasions when the show required a Jennifer to appear. Missy wasn't on contract and she could have said no. But she chose to appear as Jennifer for the gay wedding of Greg Rikaart's character.   So... I mean... I would assume they reached a détente behind-the-scenes. Missy still has her belief system but there's that.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy