Jump to content

Bring Morgan Fairchild on contract (plus Joan Collins on recurring) to B&B!


Recommended Posts

  • Members

B&B is in need of some jazzing up. Over the last number of years the show has lost its sparkle. The camp/glam/fun element that was B&B's trademark has evaporated into thin air.

Although I am still a fan and in all likelihood always will be I feel B&B is at a turning point. The Forresters and Logans cannot sustain this show on their own. Jack Wagner is an albatross that should be fired post haste and Lesley Anne Down will never have the bite necessary to get stories moving.

Morgan Fairchild, long renown for her glamorous, humorous, high style, high camp image is just the actress to revitalize B&B. She needs to be on contract and on the front burner. She needs to be a menace, a viper, a diva and a star. Further, Joan Collins is needed in a recurring capacity to add that special bit of bitchy glamor that only she possesses, perhaps as a fun sidekick to Morgan's lethal seductions.

Thus, it is time to start the beating of the drums and bring Morgan Fairchild, on contract (plus Joan Collins on recurring) to The Bold and the Beautiful!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I was saying yesterday how I'd love to see Louise Sorel on B&B. Morgan would also be great. Or Joan Collins. And bring in people who can write camp. I don't think Pam is camp, she's straight up crazy (played to perfection by Alley Mills), and Donna is so embarrassing, I can't see her as a camp figure.

I also wish they could have a drastic personality change for Katie. I don't care if she has to get hit in the head, or get struck by lightning, I think Heather Tom could be of much better service to the show if they gave her writing which was more like what she had in her best Y&R days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Y&RWorldTurner asked me in the B&B weekly discussion thread what kind of a storyline I would give to Morgan Fairchild. That is such a difficult question to answer. Not only is she an excellent comedienne, she can play tragic roles perfectly, too. And that is why she is such a great actress: no matter what kind of a role you give her, she will make it work and totally deliver.

Take for example the character she played on that horribly written and acted Fashion House, where she was pretty much the only good thing about the show. The premise sucked, the execution sucked, the dialogue was abysmal... Yet whenever she appeared, the material given to her, no matter how poorly conceived, reached unprecedented levels.

So in light of that Sophia Blakely role, I wouldn't give her a one-note type of vixen role. Nor would I make her a vixen, probably. Because then you'll just have to kill the character, send her to prison, give her an incurable disease — and it would be such a wasted opportunity to have Fairchild on the show only to dispose of her. And it doesn't matter whether it'll happen in six months or ten years. She deserves to be a legacy character, a complex, tough woman, with a complicated past, someone who perhaps, just like in Fashion House, came for revenge, making an outrageous entrance in one of those events attended by all of the characters, she would have to have a heart, a soul, something that would ultimately make her victorious and make the audience cheer for her. You don't want her to become another Gloria Abbot, who would do all these terrible things to people, but ultimately never receive a punishment for it. Vixen role has a sense only when in the end she gets defeated. And a defeat means, you're no longer needed.

Pretty much all of B&B's characters have been permanently damaged in my eyes: La Stephanie as a neurotic, interventionist mother who feels a sick love towards her son, who keeps flying all over LA in one day, at one point she's visiting Nick, telling him what to do, then she's visiting Jackie, pretty much all she does — she just enters a scene and then exits... Eric has always been a wimp, I never saw him as Stephanie's other half, and especially now after she did all those horrible things and got away with it, Taylor is a loon, instead of being this sophisticated, learned woman, with dignity and honour, she is just a pathetic shadow of her former self... And so on...

And I don't want that to happen to a possible Morgan Fairchild character.

P. S. Yes, Baranski totally made Cybill. What a character Maryann was...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It is probably heresy for me to say I loved her on Flamingo Road...and never since. (But Flamingo Road was pure 80s perfection for me ... my favorite of the 80s soaps... followed by St. Elsewhere on Tuesdays at 10 pm. Joy).

But I might tune in to see her.

I personally want something else. I'd like a reasonable follower for Stephanie. That means NOT showy. Quiet dignity. Intensity. Naturalness.

I'm going to go have a reverie now about Sam Curtis, Skipper Weldon, Titus Semple. Constance Weldon Carlyle, Fielding 'Field' Carlyle, Lane Ballou, Eudora Flowers Weldon, Lute-Mae Sanders, and Michael Tyronne

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'd love to see Morgan on B&B. She was an '80s primetime soap queen, she and Joan are icons of that era. When Morgan signed on to The City as Sydney (the character's original name was Lauren but she nixed it, saying that there were too many Laurens already and she preferred "men's names" like Sydney... okayyyy, well I've known male Laurens too but I totally digress...) she made a comment that we all want to get away from that cliched campy '80s soap bitch, which I remember SOW later saying was a mistake. In other words, they thought Morgan played Sydney a little too under-the-top and the character could have really popped had Sydney been more like CPW's Dianna which brings me too...

Raquel Welch would be another awesome addition (if only in a short-term or recurring basis) to B&B as well. Raquel is a camptress, pure and simple. I don't know if she's ever really in on the joke, she plays every thing dead seriously and totally mannered and inorganic. Every line and movement is studied and flawlessly delivered. I think a character like that is right up B&B's alley.

Raquel, Jessica Walter, and of course Sophia Loren were all considered for Alexis before Joan. All interesting performers, but NO ONE is quite like Joan. They all certainly looked the part though and ended up playing Alexis clones on CPW, Bare Essence, and Pret-a-Porter respectively... okay maybe the last one not so much a clone, but she served hat very Alexis:

200_loren.jpg

BR-online-Publikation--157812-2008070914

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Allegedly, Raquel Welch is *despised* by most everyone who has worked with her. I've met her and I feel she's an utter cow. Looks great though.

I think if Morgan was given a shot at B&B she'd be sensational. And like you say, NO ONE is quite like Joan Collins who would be so fabulous in a recurring role as a glitzy pal of Morgan's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL re: Raquel.

I'm reminded of that special Joan and Morgan did in the '80s, they did a send up of Dynasty with Morgan as Alexis and Joan as Krystle.

EDIT: Just reread my last post, me and my tangents! :P But did anyone catch Sophia at the Oscars? She stood there like a statue with hand firmly placed on hip, it was very soap diva.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If Raquel Welch saw your comment, I'm willing to bet she'd be pissed. Seriously, in my experience that woman can't take a joke to save her life, utter cow.

The special Joan and Morgan did was called Blondes vs Brunettes if I remember correctly. Morgan and Joan are very good friends. Have been for coming up 30 years.

Morgan on contract and Joan on recurring for B&B!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know much about Morgan Fairchild (except that she's had WAY too much plastic surgery) and I don't think B&B could afford Joan Collins for more than a day or two.

I agree with all of that, except about Lesley-Anne Down. It's not her fault she hasn't had a decent storyline in years - it's Bell's fault. LAD doesn't need to be replaced - she needs to be used.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Very very well said!!! 

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I knew you would be so excited seeing your girl Brookey as #1!!!! She also WINS as to Frequently Married!!!  
    • Yes, Stacy does this both for early DAYS & early GH. I have written some for her, for DAYS. But just one tiny point & that is that she only deals with DVDs. I realize that is not the point of your posting but it seemed the right thing to clarify. I know that you know that video tapes is past, not present.
    • Hahahha I think sleeping with almost all of your daughters's boyfriends and husbands and getting pregnant... definitely gives Brooke the right to top 1 place. Long live the whore of Beverly hills.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • CurlyQGrl has DVDs of some episodes, that they can sell, but that doesn't matter. What is helpful: they describe the scenes on the tapes, so you can read that as recaps without ordering anything. Doesn't really give storylines, though, which is what you asked for.  Here's the links anyhow. full menu https://www.angelfire.com/tv/curlyqgrl/menu.html GH page https://www.angelfire.com/tv/curlyqgrl/gh/menu.html GH 1960s https://www.angelfire.com/tv/curlyqgrl/gh/eps/gheps1960s.htm
    • I would argue that Another World never played "everything" for laughs. Even when there were comedic scenes in some storylines there were other storylines that were not intended as comedy.  You give 1988 as the end point, and Mary was on the canvas from August 1986 to February 1989, so she must have overlapped with the despised laughs you are referring to at least half of the time she was there. I honestly can't recall any real comedy that Mary would have been part of. I don't think she was lighthearted about choosing between two husbands, MJ's prostitution, Kathleen's death, or even her son Scott dating her daughter Cheryl.  I would have said that the amount of comedy depended on the head writer and there was more comedy under Richard Culliton and Gary Tomlin in 1984 than subsequent headwriters. I guess there was an outbreak of more comedy when Cecile kidnapped Cass from his wedding in 1986, but in general the Sin Stalker wasn't presented as funny, Mitch's return wasn't funny, John's arrival wasn't funny, Reginald wasn't funny. The tone was serious even if the plots verged on the ludicrous. And maybe that's what you mean -- but I would make a distinction between intentional comedy and storylines I can't take seriously for other reasons. 
    • I'm excited for us to get back to a full weeks worth of episodes and also us beginning to move into the episodes filmed once the show premiered. We're already starting to see changes in the lighting and the way certain characters are styled. Of course we know this week we have our first recast as well. After the big Eva reveal, I hope the show continues to move into a positive direction and that we see them starting to fix some of the things we've all had issues with.
    • It seems like they may have been going in one direction for Andre and then changed their mind. He had this player/bachelor thing going at first where he was messing with Dani, seemed to be feeling Eva, and then somehow smitten by bland Ashley of all people. I feel like Ashley was supposed to be the one that finally made him want to be with someone and settle. The way he talked her up in those earlier episodes was really confusing. The wonderful, amazing nurse Ashley and conveniently she's unattainable because she has a partner, but he can't stop thinking of her and takes these busted pics of her. It was a mess. However, it all seems to have been dropped. I honestly feel like Andre can go. That may be an unpopular opinion but I don't need his breathy final syllable to be content with BTG. It's always like "There's gotta be another wh-ahyy"
    • This is where McLaibey falls apart. It becomes clear that McTavish had not thought past Brent/Marion...so the energy drops and she starts throwing things at the wall (Blakes twins, Lonatrat.)   Fans HATED this funeral. Everyone is mad at everyone else, which is fine, the death of a beloved community figure would give people a reason to come together...(Quint and Nola could come together at least for  a bit to support each other, Nola and VAn could finally admit they kinda, sorta like each other) Its just an example of McTavish's mean writing.   I have a feeling they were going to make Dahlia Frank's kid but they chickened out. Making Tina a prostitute didn't help, they could have been lovers when they were young but felt society pressure to part. Marcus took over David's role (you can't have two young black men at that time...)   Get used to it...this will happen, the same storyline over and over until the end.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy