Jump to content

B&B: Week of March 2, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I think would be a mistake to put an established straight character like Owen into a gay storyline. In fact, I think B&B would be the worst possible vehicle for a gay storyline. It's much more of a Y&R thing, don't you think?

But why wouldn't the actors permit it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think Y&R could have done a gay story at one time (not with the people currently running Y&R), but I don't think B&B would know how to write a gay story. They'd either have a social issue plot ending with the character disappearing after a few months, or the character (if he's male) would fall in love with Brooke, Katie, or Donna, or (if she's female) Nick or Ridge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

How is Owen an established straight character? We know nothing about Owen other than that he's a former P.I. who came to town because he knew Marcus' mom was loaded. Why would it be out of the realm of possibility to assume that Owen was pursuing Donna in an attempt to get ahold of some Forrester cash, but secretly wanted some Rick action?

I'm still not convinced ole Bucky doesn't have a little sugar in the tank, either.

Alot of actors are concerned with being typecast post-gay role. Especially if it's one of the first roles you've ever played. And it could be someone's own personal issues with playing such a character.

It could be a "family thing," but I was always under the impression that Bell Shows didn't have gay characters because the one lesbian story Y&R did try to do in the late 70's nearly killed the show's ratings. It has nothing to do with whether they are card carrying Republicans.

That blind "It's a Family Thing" statement is loaded and could make one assume the Bells are homophobic. Which, if they are, then I'd rather have that come from quotes in interviews interpreted by the reader than blind speculation based on their personal politics(stuff we only know only from the surface).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IMHO, bell shows dont have a gay char because they like to mix and mingle and weave a group of people in romantic story lines, if they made a char gay they would have to bring on a few new gay char;s for that person at some point and idk, i just dont see it. however, the easy way out of this is bisexual, but soaps dont seem to understand this.

they could make a char bi, bring on a gay person for them, and have them fall for a str8 friend and whatnot.

idk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I didn't mean to imply that the Bells are homophobic. They are not.

What I meant to imply is exactly what you stated above, the lesbian storyline from the 70s nearly killed Y&R and from then on Bill Bell was adamant that it never be tried again because the reaction he got was soooo negative that it nearly cost him his show.

The Bells may be Republicans, but it certainly doesn't mean that Republicans are homophobic, Gerald Ford wasn't and I'm sure many, if not the majority, aren't as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Damn....I'm watching Tuesday's B&B right now and what was even worse than Uncle Rick and Steffy in post-coital bliss was seeing Steffy's unbelievable "walk of shame."

I know the show is trying to sell glamor, but come ON! Where is Steffy's jacked up hair, makeup, clothes, and forgetting her cellphone?

I only wished I looked half as put together as Steffy after leaving some dude's house.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Going back to the Reilly days, so many Salem residents have killed, tried to kill and/or threatened to kill people with virtually no fallout for them. It's bothered me for decades. With the new writers, it seems there might actually be actual consequences to Xander's violence this time. I hope it's not resolved quickly. Paul and Linsey both did a great job today. 
    • I’d like to see Ashley paired with a fatal gunshot. 
    • I like the twist of Drew framing Tracy, but now I'm sad that it deprived us of the sight of Jane Elliot performing "These Boots are Made for Walkin," which is such a perfect Tracy Quartermaine song. 
    • Andre and Ashley just feel like to me some stereotype in the making. The latest news of white women with black men has not been pretty. I know we have Vanessa and Doug but they represent another side of the spectrum.
    • I'm not sure when exactly they started but I remember Chris Schemering claiming they wrote the Rick/Monica/Jeff stuff as he said this type of melodrama later found them success on Dynasty but did not work on GH. He mentioned dialogue between Rick and Monica like, "You're my heaven and my hell," and, "I have a fever in my blood and you're the cure." (presumably the next line was not about needing "more cowbell.")
    • Would not necessarily call myself a shipper, as I think shipping is quite an unhealthy state of mind to exist in, but would I like to see them paired? Yes, I would.
    • I can't stand Andre with Ashley.  Sean Freeman acts the scenes well but I just don't like how Andre is being written in his scenes with Ashley. (edit to clarify: the dialogue is stilted) The last few episodes have been same Fairmont day, everyone in same wardrobe. Fyi, I can't detect it from watching but Andre's white shirt is leather https://www.shopyourtv.com/tag/andre-richardson/ specifically goatskin leather: https://shop.mango.com/us/en/p/men/jackets-and-vests/overshirts/100-leather-overshirt-with-pockets_67085137
    • I have to agree. Yesterday wasn't too bad either. I'm glad there was some movement in the B and C plots, and I'm very intrigued by Bill's story.  Nice scenes.  I have to rewatch them, though.  @Liberty City A Andre and Ashley shipper?
    •     Oh wait, I got that wrong, I think? Correcting what I said: Chelsea and Bill both assumed that Dani was fake-kissing Pamela.  But meanwhile Pamela asked for the reason for the kiss and Dani explained that she was trying to give Pamela something to focus on other than Diego.  So now I think that Dani just wanted to help Pamela, but Bill and Chelsea misconstrued (as did I).  But then Dani reverted to form and taunted Bill about it. Chelsea would be right if Dani was just kissing Pamela as a ruse to make Bill jealous.  But maybe it was really about Pamela and not about Bill.
    • Lulu is not thinking about Gio here What will this revelation do to him?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy