Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Speaking of odd language, can the Jan 6 committee (and all government entities) stop using the term "gentlewoman"?  Given that it is derived from gentleman it doesn't make it seem as politically correct as intended.  Perhaps they could just refer to all members as the "elected official" from where ever?  It has the same number of syllables and it is much more gender neutral. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6817

  • DRW50

    5989

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3461

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I feel the same. While I believe the heart and mind are in the right place, I think the 'pregnant people' messaging is going to be a problem for a general public that just isn't there yet. There are better ways to lay these identity and rights issues out than to lean directly into frames like the ones Hawley sets out beforehand, especially when meanwhile you have publications like the NYT leaning into op-eds playing devil's advocate for anti-trans/LGBT stuff complaining about this language, trying to set women against transwomen or transmen. There has to be a more unifying frame. But I also can't blame trans people for not giving a fùck about that right now, when they're becoming Public Enemy #1 with the rest of us next.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, I know. We're talking like what? .02% of the human population as a whole?  I just do an eye-roll because I feel like it's always being brought up around election year. After that, it goes away for about two years and then it comes back up again. To me, it's a constant cycle. To this day since 2016, I don't talk to my older sister because of her ignorant Facebook memes towards the trans community. And the more I have discovered her past actions, the more I realize what a disgusting human being she is with an ugly heart, and I refuse to talk to her. I still talk to my nieces, but her name doesn't come up during phone conversations.

I cannot stand hateful rhetoric towards marginalized groups of people and I'm very vocal about that. I don't care if it's family.

Edited by Noel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Unfortunately they can't.

I get why it chafes but that's the standard designation for women in the House. These hearings are historic and the term will matter in transcripts.

Notice how the Senate doesn't have this issue. Men and women are both called "Senator." But that won't work for House members in red or purple districts.

This.

Also this.

(I still can't get used to us agreeing. 

Please register in order to view this content

)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Don't worry, we can keep arguing about the WH response! But in seriousness, however we differ on the particulars of the next steps I think we're all just trying to get through the days right now and process it in our own way, I don't have the stomach for much else. Between Dobbs and the J6 hearings it's been a very hard time for my mother. She had some very difficult experiences with abortion well before Roe was law, and she's also never really has gotten over watching her former workplace under siege live on television.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes! When I lived in Tampa I had a trans woman friend. She was pre-op and about 6'3.  We ended going through the drive thru at McDonald's one night. I was the one ordering and I felt such a cold, hard wall of hate from the order taker. It was palpable. 

At first I just thought it was a black/white thing.  I was so used to Jackie I didn't even think it could be about her. Then I saw the cashier look over at her with such disgust and she did not try to hide it at all. It has to be awful to deal with that kind of random hardcore hate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It just feels like such a cruel use of "culture wars" to distract from the congressional hearings, in order to not have the people who were so easily mislead by conservative social media for the past decade realize how often they've been conned into voting against their own civil and economic interests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know people get defensive about collegiate snobbery, but it is hard not to notice the effect of education (and gender) on opinions about Trump from today's NYT polling when almost twice as many people who didn't complete a university degree still believe Trump's big lie.

 

Please register in order to view this content

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The next Jan.6 hearing is to be on July 21.

According to NBC, it is "expected to air in primetime."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/jan-6-committee-expected-hold-hearing-july-21-prime-time-rcna37943

WASHINGTON — The next Jan. 6 committee hearing will be July 21 during prime time, according to three sources familiar with the planning.

The hearing will be the eighth in a series that started in early June.

The committee's chairman, Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., declined to say after Tuesday's hearing whether next week's hearing would be the last of its investigation. He said it would be “the last one — at this point.”

-------------
Other news sources seem to be all citing NBC on the primetime.

It's not (yet) up on the committee scheduling site:
https://www.congress.gov/committee-schedule/weekly/2022/07/18

----------

UPDATE, it's now confirmed for Thurs July 21
at 8:00pm EDT
https://www.congress.gov/committee-schedule/daily/2022/07/21

 

----------------
Preview of July 21 hearing (from GMA3 interview of July 14, 2022)
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/jan-committee-member-previews-hearing/story?id=86743927

Rep. Elaine Luria, a member of the House's Jan. 6 committee who will be co-leading its next scheduled hearing, spoke to "GMA 3" Wednesday to give a preview of what's to come.

The Virginia Democrat and Navy veteran, who will be co-leading the July 21 hearing with Rep. Adam Kinzinger R-Ill., said that Americans can expect the most detailed timeline of the Capitol riot.

"Mr. Kinzinger and I plan to go through that 187 minutes. What happened between the time that [former President Donald Trump] left the stage, gave these inflammatory remarks and gave people the impression...that he was going to himself march with this crowd to the Capitol," Luria told "GMA 3."

"[And] what happened between that moment and then around 4:17 in the afternoon, which is about 187 minutes later, when he finally made a statement to the nation, to the people at the Capitol to go home."

The congresswoman said that the evidence shows that Trump wasn't emphatic in his call to the rioters to stop the violence and leave the capital.

"He didn't take the leadership role as the President of the United States, as the Commander in Chief. We're going to talk about dereliction of duty," she said.

Luria said she and Kinzinger, who is also a veteran, take that role of duty seriously. The congresswoman served two decades in the Navy, retiring at the rank of Commander before she was elected in 2018 to the House.

She is the House Democratic Caucus member with the longest active duty military record and is the vice chair of the House Armed Services Committee and a member of the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs.

"I think that while serving in uniform, I felt like the threat was clear...to protect our country, our homeland," Luria said. "But to see something come from within that is such a threat, it's really disheartening. It gives me a fear about the future of our country."

The eighth hearing is expected to be "the last one at this point," according to committee co-chair Bennie Thompson, D-Miss.

-

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Manchin was always going to do this, and any senator, official, aide or advisor who seriously thought differently at this point needs their head examined.

Manchin is like Michael Biehn said in The Terminator: "It's what he does! It's all he does!" Negotiating with him in earnest and hoping for good faith is completely pointless.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • It's so jarring seeing the changeover from Sherry Mathis to Louan Gideon.  The vibe, mannerisms, and overall personality of Liza changes instantly. The chemistry Sherry has with both David F and Joe Lambie is gone the second the recast happens.  I wonder how viewers took the news of the recast since you didn't have time in between airings before the change happened. Quinn/Sarah... One overacts (Quinn) and one under acts (Sarah). Wendy of 1985 is a good mix of the 1982 sweet Wendy and the 1983/84 vixenish Wendy.
    • Oups!! I guess when i was doing the editing, i left a part of 3169, too (RTL Lounge airs 2 episodes per day back to back). Sorry about that ! Tonight i ll try to record 3171-3172. If i m not mistaken 3172 is missing from YouTube.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I would put Felicia in the 'small dose' auntie category because she means well, but comes on too strongly at times.  In small doses, she would be a blast to hang out with.. but in anything larger than a small... she would be exhausting. I tend to prefer lower key people than people that are always 'on' all the time.  Those people can veer off into energy vampire status pretty quickly.
    • I didn't like the Harry story, but Nazar did have a great introduction. He was probably the highlight of last year.  Now that you mention it, I guess the truly dire stories (Nicole, Harper/Drew/Phil, Nicole) didn't start until summer.
    • thank you all for contributing to the Vault. I am slowly getting towards watching the 1998 episodes

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I pray⏤and I know it's a big prayer⏤that Noel Maxam is somehow able to figure things out budget-wise so we can stop re-dressing existing sets as "new" sets. I know in apartment buildings apartments can generally look the same, but I'm over it on this soap. The last time he was executive producer was in 2011 when the original Horton Town Square was introduced, and we had some other sets get introduced around this time (likely pre-commissioned prior to his election), but I'm trying to have some hope he can pull this off. Let's [finally] see it.
    • Definitely not the best of RC's breakdowns. I don't know what it says that I could pick up his trademarks yesterday 30 minutes in without even knowing that he did one. There was something more...quirky/boardstroked...about Dani. Though I love the Dani/Nicole scenes, she was just a little too hip?...which made me think back to the episode when she broke into Bill/Hayley's house. Then watching the episode later on, I saw Hayley was being used as a punchline to the more interesting and relevant Bill/Ted scenes (see you all were just talking about how you hoped they got scenes...one thing this show is great at...what people want on this board...they already have the foresight for it. The reason I feel the DNA test will get mentioned @Cheap21 in more detail). And then poor Anita reduced for the most part propping up an album.    Needless to say, not my favorite RC episode. And since we are in aftermath week, I just smh. And barely worth a rewatch. BUT...was there good for me?    Yes. Thankfully, we still got good aftermath beats regardless of the breakdown.   Like I said, I really like the Dani/Nicole scenes. But I love their dynamic. And I was looking forward to the shoe being on the other foot once the SilkPress storyline hit climax. Quirks aside, it did not disappoint. Dani came in, and she came in fierce for her sister. I loved her attacking Eva. And then her being surprisingly introspective about Nicole due to her own experience. No wonder Nicole reacted to her being self-aware. So did I.    Meanwhile Bill and Ted finally met up. I'm kinda sad that we did not get that sooner given the scenes that played out sidepiece in the background aside. It might have been interesting to see more of their status as non-Duprees coming into the family explored.    And of course I can't leave without mentioning Eva vs SilkPress Sheila which was the highlight. Both of them were giving. And SilkPress was just so cold with it. I did love that Eva finally stopped letting her gaslight her. Sad to see the duo break up. But I did love that she went to Ted. So...the next turn begins.   And speaking of turns...uh oh at Kat and Tomas. I'm sure he won't be staying away from her. So most definitely, Kat vs Eva ain't over. It will be interesting to see how it goes now that most people know that Kat was right all along. 
    • Nah I enjoyed it much more last year because of the Harry plot that ended during that time. Nazar being introduced and them. But this time it is so lame and nothing I like forward to anymore and I’m one of them long time fans. Of course I would be upset if they would cancel it but maybe take a year off or two and return refreshed 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy