Jump to content

Texas!


Chris B

Recommended Posts

  • Members

@j swift Thanks for your insights and observations.

I think Texas fans would be au fait  with story and want more bts stuff as would those readers who are not neccessarily soap fans, but interested in the workings of tv in general .

Of course some context needs to be provided.

But overall Texas stands as a testament of how not to launch a soap. 

Kind of parallel to Silverman's primetime bomb Supertrain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 563
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Just finished the Texas book and figured I’d share my impressions. As a fan of Texas from the first episode to the last, it was a joy to revisit the show and the characters and storylines that entertained me in my late teens. I’m especially appreciative of the interviews with Pam Long, Joyce Corrington, Philip Clark, and John McCafferty. The book reminded me of my crush on Clark, and the wonderful friendships of Iris & Vivien and Ruby & Lurlene. It also reminded me of how incredible McCafferty was in his performances as Billy Joe. I really loved learning about the friendship of Pam Long & Gail Kobe. And I loved the fond memories it brought back: laughing as Ruby and Lurlene tried to dispose of Beau's body, terrified for Lurlene as Bubba attacked her, the nail-biting scenes of the Marshall Ranch burning to the ground.

Unfortunately, I didn’t find this book as engrossing as the recent Ryan’s Hope book. Overall, I felt like I didn’t learn much new and kept wanting more. For instance, I wanted to know more about the Corrington’s plans for Reunion. Did they reuse any of Reunion’s bible for Texas? I would like to know more about Pam Long’s plans for the show, including the introduction of a Hispanic family. Besides the Phillip-Beth storyline, did Long reuse any of her other planned Texas stories on Guiding Light? I was also baffled by a few things. Why is there no mention of Entertainment Tonight announcing the cancellation of Texas around April 1982? I clearly remember how devastated I felt when I heard the news and the elation the next night when Entertainment Tonight reported that the show would continue. (I can’t recall if NBC had changed its mind or if was Entertainment Tonight’s mistake in reporting the cancellation.) And sorry if this seems nitpicky, but as a writer/editor, I have to say that the book would have benefitted from close proofreading and some fact-checking. There are so many typos that I found distracting. Ginny is referenced as Jenny. Names are misspelled. Punctuation is missing. Another character is referred to by the wrong name on multiple occasions. The hospital is incorrectly referred to as Gold Coast Hospital. It was Gulfcoast Hospital, a nod to Houston being close to the Gulf of Mexico.

And I was so freaking proud to see @antmunoz in the acknowledgments!!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Although I haven't finished the book, I am also disappointed more of this type of stuff isn't included.  For instance, I'd like to know what other plots the Corringtons had planned, that were either nixed by tptb, or they didn't have time to get to before being fired.  I'm pretty sure Maggie Dekker had some kind of secret that likely involved her nephew, Rikki.  Was he really her son rather than nephew?  There were hints of something between these two characters that was completely dropped when Maggie was abruptly written off.  I'm sure the Corringtons had an entire list of upcoming plots when they were fired, and I was hoping to learn about those.   As I said, I haven't finished the book, so maybe some of the things I'm looking for are included.  But I'm not hopeful.  

Edited by Mona Kane Croft
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm was surprised to hear how fast the Texas book was published. I had assumed it would take a good two years to be written and published. But it seems like this was written and published in under a year. Just reading the two reviews above, it sounds like this was a rushed job, when it shouldn't have been. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The book very briefly touches on Maggie when she was written out in September 1981. I think there's one sentence that says that a dark storyline had been planned and that Maggie may have been a prostitute or madam.

The stuff about Paul Rader's stint as head writer is quite interesting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not planning to buy or read the book. I'm curious what was written about Rader/Flescher as they were brought in (suspiciously) three months after the end 1981 writers' strike (probably when Pursuer/Radcliffe's contract was up). Never heard of them. Rader stayed as a breakdown/scriptwriter until cancellation. I think Pam was only head writer (officially) for about 8 weeks at the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

According to Carolyn Culliton, Paul Rader was a novelist Gail Kobe discovered and decided to hire. With no daytime experience, he ended up writing the show longer than any other head writer. Kobe picked up a copy of his 1969 novel, Professor Wilmess Must Die, in an airport and decided to hire him as head writer. Jeff Ryder said that Kobe's decision to hire Rader was unexpected and that he wasn't impressed with Rader's story projections. Gerald Flesher worked in advertising and was hired as the show's story editor. Gary Tomlin suspects that Flesher was writing the show during the 1981 writers' strike.

Long wrote Texas longer than the last eight weeks. Rader was credited as head writer during some of her run, possibly because of contractual reasons. Long states that the fire at the Marshall Ranch was her work but apparently Rader was credited as the head writer. Rader did join Long's writing team writing outlines but didn't last because he didn't know how to write outlines. He quickly left the show.

One of Long's plans was to restore Billy Joe to his bad boy ways.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Tom Lisanti's work has inspired me to write my own book: "Where the Ratings Ain't: A Comprehensive Oral History of CBS' Groundbreaking Soap Opera 'Where the Heart Is'...As Told by the Few Who Still Remember It."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Just got my copy of the Texas book. I haven't started it yet but although I knew it wasn't likely I had hoped for an index so I could jump to specific topics if I wanted to. Serves me right for buying a hardback rather than a searchable ebook.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I finished Tom Lisanti’s book and I really enjoyed it. I love that the cast and crew still have such love and respect for Texas after all of these years. The timing of the book’s release was perfect for me as I am rewatching Texas on YouTube.  I am currently watching episodes where Elliot Carrington and Jeb Hampton have just been introduced. For me the show is starting to find its groove. The Tanquir story is over, Paige is scheming, Reena and Max are fighting their attraction to each other, Dennis’ paternity is about to blow up and some unlikeable characters are soon to be written out (Dawn, Clipper). I believe that if the Corringtons had been given a full year they may have been able to get the ratings up a bit. Although they really wrote a lot a violence against women. It’s a bit uncomfortable to watch.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I read the whole thing, and I wholeheartedly agree. I'm 46 and didn't see it in its original run, but I was really curious about all the BTS stuff like you are. I mean, giving a storyline by storyline breakdown was not really interesting and certainly didn't push me to watch the show's run on YouTube. Honestly, I wanted to learn more about how Texas influenced 1980s Guiding Light, which I have fond memories of growing up with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I found this part to be hilarious. On the surface it sounds mean, but those that have worked with Beverlee have said she had a wicked sense of humor. I'm sure this was done tongue-in-cheek while still getting a point across. 

I, too, wish there had been more focus on backstage drama going on. There definitely seemed to be enough of it. As someone else said, Texas seems to be a blueprint for how not to launch a soap. Starting a new show already in progress (with its stories starting on AW) had to have been a turnoff for non-AW fans tuning for a chance to watch a new show at the beginning. (Think BTG recently.) It seems the show was doomed from the start. 

My biggest memory of Texas was the Hitopah storyline and Brette being in the cave to get the Fire Compass only to have legions of snakes fall on her while retrieving it. I was 9. It terrified me, but I loved the Indiana Jones type of story. I was surprised to realize the head writer, Rader, had been hired to write the show because of a random book Kobe plucked out of an airport bookstore.

I know some people love Kobe, but she didn't come across to me like someone who knew what she was doing. Randomly hiring completely unexperienced writers for the show (Rader, then Long) doesn't seem wise. Although, I guess Long turned out okay. Kobe also seemed petty with actors. Not utilizing someone like Kin Shriner because she felt he wasn't behind her or the show seemed stupid. Wasn't there a comment she was afraid to focus on Courtney/Jeb because if they became popular it would just be a bigger loss when they left? Umm...you're at the bottom of the ratings. Is it worse to have attention on a couple for a month than not at all. The show needed attention! And who is to say Kin Shriner wouldn't have stayed if he felt utilized and had story? He admitted he loved living in New York.

Didn't Phillip Clark also get ignored once it was known he was going to exit at the end of his contract? He was moved offscreen. Ryan and Ginny were arguably the most popular couple on the show and you just sideline Ryan instead of using him while you can? 

I also noticed Harley Kozak make the comment that she had nothing juicy to tell about anything behind the scenes of Texas because they all genuinely liked each other, but if she had been asked about Guiding Light....   PLEASE, someone ask her about GL

I loved the new direction Texas was going in the last year. Probably because Ruby became my favorite character and I loved the Mark/Ruby/Rikki/Brette quad. And, of course, I loved the Reena/Justin/Ashley triangle. If only they could have been given more time...(without being moved to 11 am.. Yes, the share went up, but viewership went down.)

Edited by Melroser
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • This opening scene is hilarious...it's like someone wrote out the script for Philip with one hand. And Rick...I haven't seen so much scarf-sniffing since Blue Velvet. And in their next scene they are still sniffing the [!@#$%^&*] scarf. Did our dear David Lynch watch GL?

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm back! We are back! Me and my husband are finally back at our favorite hobby! How could I postpone returning to this amazing show for so long??? What was I thinking??? Another World - February 2nd, 1989 The dead will revenge the living 

      Please register in order to view this content

      Bay City better be ready, because I'm back!   At Vicky's apartment she is once again drowning in doubts and jealousy. Deep down she realizes that her dream wedding will be a farce and nothing can change that. Bridget tries to calm her down, but the heroine is determined to suffer. She is not hearing any positive thoughts. She doesn't believe Jamie will marry her. At the Cory Publishing building another farce is in process. Iris, once again pretending to be the angel of love and sisterhood... is telling Mac and Rachel some wonderful news. When Iris has good news, you really need to look out for yourself. That's when things are bad. So what are the news? Miss Devil has put Amanda up for an award! Mac is smiling from ear to ear, and Rachel is suspicious. Maybe that's the effect Iris is looking for. To once again accent on the fact that Rachel doubts and criticizes her daughter. Iris will do anything to destabilize their relationship. She is like a cancer. Back to Vicky! Jamie is at the door. Looking like a sad puppy, he has come with a surprise. No, he is not gonna leave her and her unborn... Not yet. He has bought her earrings. Sad face. How nice. NOT. Victoria, of course... manages to break one of them the moment she touches it. Bad premonition maybe? She was back in hysterics. It's not easy to trap a man into marriage. Then you have to live with someone that didn't want you in the first place.  We were introduced to a new character (to me at least she is new) - Cass's sister - Stacey. She is giving me "hidden skeletons in the closet"-vibes. Love a girl like that. Stunning actress. I like her. The highlight of the episode was the strange and creepy reveal of Evan the escort... hugging someone named Janice's grave. I remember she had an issue with Rachel... and Rachel killed her in self defense I think... It was hinted in prior episodes, but I lack the context and story. I just know that everyone at the Frame house was mad that Rachel killed the bish. But I also got the impression that this Janice was sick in the head. So Evan is now talking to her grave and telling her he is going to ruin Rachel's life basically. Oh, Evan... I liked you better as a sexy gigolo.  Overall - 10/10 - how can I rate it lower when I haven't watched in months!!!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Once again, Marlena and Kayla were used very effectively and I couldn’t be happier.  Marlena counseling Johnny and then Chanel was the best part of today. They’re really delving into the human emotion of this storyline and I think that’s a good thing. It feels so much mature than it was before. EJ’s fear about what could happen to Johnny if he doesn’t let go of his anger could lead to some really good storylines in the future.  I also really appreciate the way that Paula/Jeanne are mixing it up and having different characters interact with each other. It was nice to see Shawn and Johnny remember that they’re cousins and share a scene together. I liked the parallel that was drawn between the two of them, and what’s going on with their fathers. I did have mixed feelings about everything with Cat though. I enjoyed Chanel warning her about EJ, mostly because it played into the way that she was written today. But I wasn’t the biggest fan of the Chad/EJ scenes. The two of them discussing Chad’s potential feelings for Cat didn’t really keep my interest.  But above all, I feel that everyone is being used more effectively and that we’re getting a better understanding of everyone as well. And that was exactly what Days needed.  
    • It's a wild story for sure, especially the final conclusion (and fireworks offcamera, like Victoria Wyndham tearing into Michael Logan).
    • @I Am A Swede @DRW50  

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • I did some research and the story wrapped up with Eric,a caretaker responsible for Georgina's death who then  tried to do away with Laurie but a vision of Georgina spooked him and he smashed into a mirror, dying of glass wounds. So there was a supernatural element. I wonder if the Brody character in the credits was Eric Brody?
    • AI has it wrong. David was working as an aide at PV Hospital due to failing to save his brother's life and refusing to continue as a doctor. His true profession was revealed later. Edna had divorced him while he was in Vietnam and he had no reason to be in contact with her. He had no idea that he had a daughter.  Ruth was Ruth Martin, she was still married to Joe, not Jeff. He was not deceiving Ruth as he believed that Edna was his ex. The poisoning story happened late in his run and probably introduced when they knew Gleason was leaving. AI's interpretation of him as conniving seems to based on that short lived poisoning story and other misinformation. For most of 76 he was involved in the Ruth/Joe triangle to the point where Ruth was ready to divorce Joe and leave town. Joe had to have surgery, David operated and Ruth suddenly realized she wanted to stay with Joe despite all the problems they'd been happening. David then got involved with Christina with Jeff and then Edna as complications. And he arrived late 75 not 76.
    • Interesting that they started going into a supernatural direction with ghosts - I don't think they really did that before? I wonder if it was a response to getting put so late in the afternoon and I guess trying to appeal to that former Dark Shadows audience? 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy